We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,131)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (413)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (799)
  • Wink's Articles (352)
  • Wink's Inside Story (273)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Ambulance Chasers and a Lack of Responsibility

    January 20, 2010 by Sheryl J. Moore

    Ambulance Chasers and  a Lack of Responsibility

    BY SHERYL MOORE

    Ask anyone who has been in the insurance business for more than a decade about class-action lawsuits and you’ll likely hear that they’ve had experience with at least one (be it “vanishing premiums,” underfunded UL, or annuities).

    These lawsuits have been around for a long time and are an unfortunate part of the insurance business. The lawyers that specialize in class-action work make their money by pursuing lawsuits where a group of people with similar injuries sue the defendant. Ordinarily, when we think of class actions, we think of the pharmaceutical industry (certain ED pills casing blindness) or corporate giants (major software companies over-charging in an anti-competitive environment). However, the insurance industry has become a target for lawyers looking to benefit from this litigation.

    And that is really what it is all about: lawyers benefitting. Think about it- what did people receive when that aforementioned software company settled? A measly $30? Guess how much the lawyers made on that settlement? In a review of 20 percent of the states’ actions in that settlement, the average attorneys’ fees requested was $65 million. Still doubting who truly benefits from class action lawsuits? Read on.

    I recently conducted research of 44 class-action lawsuits in the insurance industry from 2002 to present. Settlements on these suits ran as high as $22 million. Policyholder benefits ranged from a return of premiums paid to a return of premiums plus 4.15 percent interest. Now, that is not too shabby, but the attorneys’ fees on these suits ran as high as $6.4 million each. I think we can all agree that the attorneys are the ones who made out like bandits in these lawsuits, not the policyholders.

    These lawsuits are typically propagated by commercials asking if you’ve been “injured or harmed” by a life insurance company. What could be better than “free money,” right? Unfortunately, this attitude ends up hurting the very people class-action suits are supposed to benefit: policyholders. The insurance company has to pass along increased costs of doing business through higher costs for insurance.

    Often the basis of class-action lawsuits in the insurance industry is product misunderstanding or failure to disclose product terms adequately. In my review of these lawsuits, insurance companies have largely done a good job of disclosing the terms of the contracts, and have done so in laymen’s terms. The lawyers claim that the policyholder did not know that their money would be “tied up” for 10 years. Really? On page two of the contract, it clearly displays a 10-year surrender charge penalty in 14-point type. Some attorneys have argued that the policyholders did not understand the maturity date in the contract. Apparently they don’t either, as extending this date as long as possible is always in the policyholders’ favor. Ultimately, policyholders themselves bear responsibility. People should always read any contract and ask questions before they sign.

    So, we know how lawyers feel abou the class-action suits (like they are winning the lottery), and we know how policyholders feel (like they just won a second scratch-off lottery ticket on a scratch-off lottery ticket) but how about the insurance companies? I would say panicked is an appropriate descriptor.

    The instant the insurance company’s name is published with the words “class-action” next to it, the company’s name is tarnished and suddenly the target of offensive media. Class-action lawsuits end up being so costly from a policyholder perception standpoint that most insurance companies settle their suits just to get their names out of the negative press.

    Insurance class actions have reached an entirely new level of foulness. I recently had the occasion to witness a form of legalized blackmail when 0ne state’s attorney general decided to take on the major players in the indexed annuity market. Despite a staggering lack of wrongdoing (with the exception of one company), the insurance companies marketing these products settled quickly to avoid negative publicity. All the while, the “blackmail” was boosting the political aspirations of the young attorney general.

    Lawyers are motivated by the big payoff. Policyholders are motivated by the “free money.” In the end, we all end up paying the the lawyers keep getting richer and richer.

    Sheryl Moore is president and CEO of AnnuitySpecs.com and LifeSpecs.com, an indexed product resource in Des Moines. She has more than a decade of experience working with indexed products, and provides competitive intelligence, market research, product development, consulting services and insight to select financial services companies. She may be reached at Sheryl Moore.

    This article was done at the request of, and in rememberance of, Bo Johnson of FIG Marketing. Bo served the indexed annuity industry with his strength, knowledge, and ethics. His friendship will be missed by many.

    To those who knew him, Bo Johnson was courageous, optimistic, a loving father and devoted husband. Berry Holland Johnson Jr. (known as ‘Bo’ to his peers), 37, of Cornelius, N.C., died December 5 at his home, surrounded by his family. Bo passed away after a relentless and brave fight against lung cancer, but left an indelible impact on the lives around him- family, peers, agents, and clients. He is survived by wife Christi and daughter Addi.

    Click here for a PDF of this article.

    Originally Posted at Insurance News Net Magazine on January 1, 2010 by Sheryl J. Moore.

    Categories: Sheryl's Articles
    currency