We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,131)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (413)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (799)
  • Wink's Articles (352)
  • Wink's Inside Story (273)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • In The IA Crystal Ball For 2009

    January 9, 2010 by Sheryl J. Moore

    Published 1/5/2009 

    What does 2009 hold for the index annuity industry? Here are some likely possibilities.

    Regulatory changes. From a sales and marketing perspective, such changes are in the IA industry’s best interests. For instance, I just reviewed a policy filing with a 25% bonus on the benefit base of the guaranteed lifetime withdrawal benefit; regulatory guidance will definitely be needed on marketing such products.

    Some changes to expect concern training on index-linked products. Count on more states making a continuing education requirement on IA sales, similar to regulations put out by the state of Iowa-i.e., any producer selling indexed life or annuities in that state must pass 4 hours of generic/non-product specific IA and IUL training.

    However, a number of states will consider requiring more than 4 hours of CE on those products-to make absolutely sure that all sales in their states are suitable.

    Some states will also begin requiring product training to be the responsibility of the insurance carrier, or that it must take place with a carrier-appointed monitor. Why? This means major changes are afoot for the independent marketing organizations, which have traditionally handled the bulk of indexed product training.

    As a result, compensation arrangements may need to be adjusted, and product development may evolve to even simpler designs.

    Also in 2009, consumer-signed annuity illustrations may become a requirement in various states. This is something that has not been suggested by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, Kansas City, Mo. But now, because of the much publicized calls for, and need for, greater disclosure, these projections of policy values may become a routine part of the business.

    In that case, if the consumer-oriented materials do not make it exactly clear how much value the customer will take away upon cash surrender, the illustration will make it abundantly clear. Annuity professionals should plan on learning new software, should this be the case.

    Also count on additional states adopting annuity suitability regulations. Among the 38 states already using a suitability regulation, expect some to make modifications of the current regulations. The goal here will be to ensure zero consumer complaints, that all T’s will be crossed and all I’s dotted.

    Product innovation. It may seem that insurance carriers have already gotten creative with their indexed annuity designs, but they haven’t even started.

    In the next 12 months, additional carriers will roll-out premium bonus products using vesting schedules and recapture charges. This enables them to keep surrender charges relatively low, and share the risk of offering a higher bonus with the consumer.

    Additional bonus designs will emerge which credit a bonus to the benefit base of the GLWB, rather than to the contract’s account value. Although annuitants cannot receive this bonus upon cash surrender, these designs will increase the value upon which their guaranteed withdrawal payments are based.

    Other innovations will include an increase in the number of guaranteed minimum death benefit riders for indexed annuities as well as new crediting method designs.

    A response on proposed Rule 151A. The Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., did hold its promised December 17, 2008 meeting on this controversial rule and did vote to reclassify index annuities, effectively making them securities. The SEC announced that the rule would go into effect on January 12, 2011.

    At this writing, it appears that numerous carriers will band together to challenge the SEC’s action in court. Their main argument will be that there is already legal precedent establishing that these products are insurance contracts, not securities.

    Lawsuits. There will be a variety of other lawsuits in 2009, as has become customary in the insurance business. Although the industry strives for 100% satisfaction, suitability issues seem to keep some in the business busy sorting out conflicts in the legal system. But in 2009, the lawsuits to watch will be carriers filing suit against the SEC.

    Sheryl Moore is president and chief executive officer of AnnuitySpecs.com, an indexed product resource in Des Moines, Iowa. Her e-mail address is sheryl.moore@annuityspecs.com

    Originally Posted at National Underwriter on January 5, 2009 by Sheryl J. Moore.

    Categories: Sheryl's Articles
    currency