We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (16,323)
  • Industry Conferences (3)
  • Industry Job Openings (10)
  • Negative Media (138)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (606)
  • Sheryl's Blogs (173)
  • Wink's Articles (235)
  • Wink's Blogs (216)
  • Wink's Press Releases (94)
  • Blog Archives

  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Response: For Now, SEC Shifts Gaze From Indexed Annuities

    January 3, 2010 by Sarah Morgan

    PDF for Setting It Straight with SmartMoney

    ORIGINAL ARTICLE CAN BE FOUND AT: For Now, SEC Shifts Gaze From Indexed Annuities

    Dear Ms. Morgan:

    I am an independent market research analyst who specializes exclusively in the indexed annuity and indexed life markets. I have tracked the companies, products, marketing, and sales of these products for over a decade. I used to provide similar services for fixed and variable products, but I believe so strongly in the value proposition of indexed products that I started my own company focusing on IAs exclusively. I do not endorse any company or financial product, and millions look to us for accurate, unbiased information on the insurance market. In fact, we are the firm that regulators look to, and work with, when needing assistance with these products.

    I recently had the occasion to read your article, “For Now, SEC Shifts Gaze From Indexed Annuities,” which was published in SmartMoney. I noticed a couple of inaccuracies and misleading statements in the article, and wanted to reach out to assist you with them.

    First, indexed annuities are not an investment. They are fixed insurance products. “Risk money products” such as variable annuities, stocks, and bonds are investments. “Safe money products” such as fixed annuities and indexed annuities are insurance.

    Although your source Bryan Place indicates that “investors often do not understand that the products they’re buying carry a cap on the returns they’ll see,” the insurance industry is VERY diligent in promoting indexed annuities to provide limited gains tied to the performance of a stock market index. Although he is correct that the indexed annuity purchaser could receive as little as 4% interest (in fact they could receive as low as 0%), the indexed annuity purchaser is also protected from declines in the index. So, when the market declined nearly 50% over the one-year period from March 2008 to March 2009, indexed annuity purchasers did not lose a single penny of their money because of the market downturn. I would contest that this is a value proposition that most Americans wish their retirement product had offered over that same period.

    Regardless of Mr. Place’s statement that caps “create a two-tailed risk,” they do not. Indexed annuities, whether they have a cap or not, are intended to return 1% – 2% greater interest than a fixed annuity is offering today. So, if fixed annuities are offering 4% interest today, an indexed annuity will likely return 5% – 6% to the annuitant over the lifetime of product. Certainly, some years the client will receive 0% interest, and other years they will in fact earn double-digit gains. However, indexed annuities are not priced to compete against risk money products such as stocks and bonds. Because of the expense of the minimum guarantee and the floor that these products offer, they are comparably priced to products such as fixed annuities and Certificates of Deposit (CDs). Indeed, indexed annuities DO provide a very efficient hedge against volatility in the market by providing a guaranteed minimum floor of no less than 0% interest crediting.

    Also alarming was Mr. William Reichenstein’s statement that indexed annuities “tend to be relatively high-cost products.” What it he trying to allude with this statement- that these products have high surrender charges? They do not have fees at all, so that cannot be it. However, if this is regarding surrender charges, indexed annuities are available with surrender charges as short as one year. In addition, all indexed annuity purchasers are given access to 10% of their annuity’s value, annually, without being subject to surrender penalties (some products even allow as much as 20% to be taken annually). In addition, 9 out of 10 indexed annuities provide a waiver of the surrender charges, should the annuitant need access to their money in events such as nursing home confinement, terminal illness, disability, and even unemployment. Couple this with the fact these products pay the full account value to the beneficiary upon death, and I think you would have difficulty implying that these products are high-cost.

    To provide you with clarification on the commissions these products are paying, the average street level commission on indexed annuities as of 4Q2009 was 6.47%. Compare this to the consistent, generous commissions that are paid annually on mutual funds and like products, and I think you’ll agree that indexed annuity commissions are quite reasonable.

    Your sources may feel that “consumers could benefit from more disclosure about the terms and risks of these products” if Rule 151A goes through. However, they appear to be ignorant of the existing regulation that is in place for indexed annuities today. Indexed annuities are regulated by the 50 state insurance divisions of the United States. These insurance commissioners regulate indexed annuities with rigorous standard non-forfeiture laws (SNFL), advertising guidelines, suitability regulations, and other rules. The states hold the authority to take sanctions against insurance agents including, but not limited to, license revocation, penalties and fines. An interesting comparison of state and federal regulation exists relative to annuity complaints specifically. If I need to make a complaint on an indexed annuity, the state insurance division has to respond to me within ten days; and I incur no cost in my efforts to resolve the problem. Compare this with the exhaustive complaint process on the securities side; delays, lawyers, and a lot of my money spent. Yes, SEC regulation  is different, but it most definitely is not better.

    One of your sources indicates that if 151A goes through, insurance commissions are the SEC will regulate indexed annuities and that effectively “you’ve got two sets of eyes looking at the product.” Although this would be true, it does not necessarily mean it is better. Unnecessary, duplicative regulation will result in increased costs to the insurance companies selling these products. These increased costs, in turn, will be passed on to the indexed annuity purchaser. In addition, if you take a look at the National Association of Insurance Commissioner’s (NAICs) Closed Complaint Database, you’ll see a startling difference between the complaints on products regulated by insurance commissioners and those regulated by the SEC:

    ■ In 2007, indexed annuity complaints averaged 4.1 per company (in comparison, variable annuity complaints averaged 5.9 per company)

    ■ In 2008, indexed annuity complaints averaged 3.8 per company (in comparison, variable annuity complaints averaged 7.1 per company)

    So, not only have indexed annuity complaints declined, but variable annuity complaints are rising! In addition, indexed annuity complaints are far fewer than the complaints on products that the SEC is already regulating! This certainly gives pause to the concept of the SEC’s current level of regulation on annuities.

    In closing, it is alarming to see the slanted sources that you have used for this article on an important insurance product. Today more than ever, Americans are looking for reliable sources to inform them on how to keep their retirement dollars safe. It is distressing to see that a publication as highly-regarded as SmartMoney would not seek out sources that are unbiased and neutral on this topic. Should you have a need for such a source, who can provide FACTUAL information on indexed annuities in the future, please do not hesitate to reach out to us.

    Thank you.

    Sheryl J. Moore

    President and CEO

    LifeSpecs.com

    AnnuitySpecs.com

    Advantage Group Associates, Inc.

    (515) 262-2623 office

    (515) 313-5799 cell

    (515) 266-4689 fax

    Originally Posted at Wall Street Journal's Smart Money on December 10, 2009 by Sarah Morgan.

    Categories: Negative Media
    currency