We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,128)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (413)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (799)
  • Wink's Articles (352)
  • Wink's Inside Story (272)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Split Decision In Allianz Life Annuity Lawsuit

    January 9, 2010 by Chris Serres

    October 14, 2009

    A split decision in Allianz Life annuity lawsuit: Some experts wonder if verdict gives companies a license to deceive. [Star Tribune, Minneapolis] By Chris Serres, Star Tribune, MinneapolisOct. 14–A four-year legal saga, which pitted hundreds of thousands of older Americans against an insurance giant from Golden Valley, has come to a quiet — and seemingly contradictory — end.

    A federal jury ruled late Monday that Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America used deceptive practices in selling a certain type of investment product known as an equity-indexed annuity, which is linked to the stock market.

    But in a surprising twist, the 11-person jury awarded no damages to the estimated 340,000 people nationwide who bought the annuities earlier this decade, noting that no one was directly harmed from the deceptive sales practices.

    The verdict culminates a prolonged legal battle between Allianz Life and consumers who claimed the company enticed them into buying annuities with false promises of bonuses that never materialized.

    For years, the case cast a dark cloud over Allianz Life and other major insurance companies that sell these annuities. The companies were forced to defend their reputations — and pay out millions — as an onslaught of attorneys and state regulators said they were glossing over the complex nature of the products and locking older people into contracts from which they may not live long enough to fully benefit. Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson was among those who went after the company for sale of the products.

    Now, the verdict puts an end to the legal squabbling but raises new questions about the lengths to which companies can go in marketing sophisticated financial products. In this case, the jury appeared to agree with one of Allianz Life's arguments during the three-week trial: People who bought the annuities fared better than if they had put their money in the moribund stock market.

    The implication, some legal experts argued, is that financial companies can deceive customers but not be penalized if the products themselves do not hurt people's pocketbooks.

    “Does this mean a company can be dishonest and, because of an external event, get off scot-free?” Akshay Rao, a marketing professor at the University of Minnesota's Carlson School of Management, who testified on behalf of the plaintiffs, said in an interview Tuesday. “Had the [stock] market not tanked, would Allianz have been culpable?”

    Allianz Life, a unit of Germany's Allianz SE, has strongly disputed allegations that its sales practices were deceptive and declared victory Tuesday. “We are very pleased that the jury concluded that no harm came to our policyholders,” said Gary Bhojwani, president and chief executive officer of Allianz Life.

    The lead plaintiff in the case was Linda Mooney, a 65-year-old retired nurse from Kansas who said she invested $216,189 in an Allianz annuity on the promise that she would receive an up-front 10 percent bonus of about $21,600. Mooney said she never received the bonus; and she incurred an $18,000 surrender charge for cashing out of a previous annuity from TransAmerica.

    The original lawsuit, filed in 2006, alleged buyers of the annuities had to pay surrender charges of 12.5 percent of the amount invested if they did not lock up their money for 15 years or longer, according to the complaint. Many buyers of the annuities were older.

    Karl Cambronne, a Minneapolis attorney who represented the plaintiffs in the class action case, said he was “absolutely not happy” with the jury's decision not to award damages in the case. He suspects the jurors may have been influenced by the argument that holders of Allianz Life annuities might have done worse in the stock market.

    “One of the major themes at trial was, 'Gee, aren't these annuity purchasers smart? Instead of suffering the 30 to 40 percent downturn [in the stock market], they were in annuities,'” Cambronne said.

    The lawsuit was just the latest in a string of court cases involving Allianz Life and its annuities.

    In February 2008, Allianz Life paid $10 million to settle charges that it sold unsuitable annuities to thousands of senior citizens in California. And two years ago, in a settlement with Swanson, Allianz Life agreed to return money to about 7,000 senior citizens who had purchased annuities since 2001.

    In both cases, Allianz Life agreed to strengthen the way it reviews annuity applications, and insurance industry experts say the company is now a leader in disclosing the risks of annuities to its customers.

    “Allianz has been a problem child in the past,” said Sheryl Moore, president and chief executive of AnnuitySpecs.com, a website that tracks the index annuity market. “The brochures they used to explain these products were not written in plain language. … But they really have cleaned up their act — to the point where this is no longer an issue.”

    The litigation does not appear to have dampened sales of Allianz's indexed annuities. The company posted sales of nearly $1.5 billion in the second quarter, up 40 percent from the same period a year ago, according to AnnuitySpecs.com. Allianz Life is the second-largest seller of indexed annuities in the nation with a 17 percent market share.

    Chris Serres –612-673-4308

    To see more of the Star Tribune, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.startribune.com/.

    Copyright (c) 2009, Star Tribune, Minneapolis

    Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet on October 14, 2009 by Chris Serres.

    Categories: Sheryl's Articles
    currency