We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (15,702)
  • Industry Conferences (3)
  • Industry Job Openings (9)
  • Negative Media (135)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (582)
  • Sheryl's Blogs (165)
  • Wink's Articles (221)
  • Wink's Blogs (205)
  • Wink's Press Releases (92)
  • Blog Archives

  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Response: Annuities? Give Me a Break!

    March 17, 2010 by Sheryl J. Moore

     

    ORIGINAL ARTICLE CAN BE FOUND AT: Annuities? Give Me a Break!

    Jeff,

    As you well know, I am an independent market research analyst who specializes exclusively in the indexed annuity (IA) and indexed life markets. I have tracked the companies, products, marketing, and sales of these products for over a decade. I used to provide similar services for fixed and variable products, but I believe so strongly in the value proposition of indexed products that I started my own company focusing on IAs exclusively. I do not endorse any company or financial product, and millions look to us for accurate, unbiased information on the insurance market. In fact, we are the firm that regulators look to, and work with, when needing assistance with these products.

    For the fourth occasion in eight months’ time, and the second in a week’s time, I am in the position of having to correct you on inaccurate and misleading statements that have been made in one of your blogs about indexed annuities. Specifically, I recently had the occasion to read your blog Annuities? Give Me A Break! I wanted to bring to your attention the mistakes that were made in this piece, which was recently posted on your blog at http://www.guardingyourwealth.com/annuities/articles/GiveMeABreak.htm. I do this in the hopes that you do not continue to make the same mistakes in future pieces that you author. I am certain that you are quite embarrassed about the number and level of inaccuracies in these pieces, and want to help you avoid such awkwardness in the future.

    First, as I have mentioned at least four times to you before, indexed annuities have not been referred to as “equity indexed annuities” since the late 1990’s. The insurance industry has been careful to enforce a standard of referring to the products as merely “indexed annuities” or “fixed indexed annuities,” so as not to confuse consumers. This industry wants to make a clear distinction between these fixed insurance products and equity investments. It is the safety and guarantees of these products which appeal to consumers, particularly during times of market downturn and volatility. Your help in avoiding any such confusion is so greatly appreciated.

    Second, as you are well aware, one cannot “invest” in an indexed annuity. An indexed annuity is an insurance product, not an investment. Other insurance products include fixed annuities, term insurance and whole life. Alternatively, investment products include variable annuities, stocks, mutual funds, and bonds. Insurance products are regulated by the 50 state insurance commissioners of the United States. Investments are regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Insurance products do not put the client’s money at risk, they are “safe money products” which preserve principal. Investments, by contrast, can put all of a client’s money at risk and are therefore appropriately classified as “risk money products.” Investments do not preserve principal where insurance products do.

    Third, what makes you think that anyone who owns an indexed annuity is “trapped?” The average surrender charge on indexed annuities as of 4Q2009 was ten years. The average first-year penalty is 10.61%. In addition, the majority of these longer-term products are offered with a premium bonus, which provides an immediate boost to the annuitant’s cash value. Longer surrender charges are necessary to appropriately price for such an incentive. Furthermore, indexed annuities are some of the most flexible, liquid products available today. All indexed annuity consumers are given access to 10% of their annuity’s value, annually, without being subject to surrender penalties (some even allow as much as 20% to be taken annually). In addition, 9 out of 10 indexed annuities provide a waiver of the surrender charges, should the annuitant need access to their money in events such as nursing home confinement, terminal illness, disability, and even unemployment. Couple this with the fact these products pay the full account value to the beneficiary upon death, and I think you would have difficulty inferring that these products are illiquid.

    Fourth, “dangers” of these products include, but are not limited to the following:

    1. No indexed annuity purchaser has lost a single dollar as a result of the market’s declines. Can you say the same for variable annuities? Stocks? Bonds? Mutual funds? NO.
    2. All indexed annuities return the premiums paid plus interest at the end of the annuity.
    3. Ability to defer taxes: you are not taxed on annuity, until you start withdrawing income.
    4. Reduce tax burden: accumulate your retirement funds now at a [35%] tax bracket, and take income at retirement within a [15%] tax bracket.
    5. Accumulate retirement income: annuities allow you to accumulate additional interest, above the premium you pay in. Plus, you accumulate interest on your interest, and interest on the money you would have paid in taxes. (Frequently referred to as “triple compounding.”)
    6. Provide a death benefit to heirs: all fixed and indexed annuities pay the full account value to your beneficiaries upon death.
    7. Access money when you need it: fixed annuities allow annual penalty-free withdrawals of the account value, typically at 10% of the annuity’s value (although some indexed annuities permit as much as 20% of the value to be taken without penalty). In addition, 9 out of 10 fixed and indexed annuities permit access to the annuity’s value without penalty, in the event of triggers such as nursing home confinement, terminal illness, disability, and even unemployment.
    8. Get a boost on your retirement: many fixed and indexed annuities provide an up-front premium bonus, which can provide an instant boost on your annuity’s value. This can increase the annuity’s value in addition to helping with the accumulation on the contract.
    9. Guaranteed lifetime income: an annuity is the ONLY product that can guarantee income that one cannot outlive.

    Wow- dangerous, huh? Who wouldn’t want these benefits when looking for a retirement income product?

    Fifth, why does it matter how much money the agent makes if the client purchases a product that is right for them? Yes, you are right- there are indexed annuities with a commission of 10%; precisely five products out of all 255 indexed annuities. Furthermore, these products accounted for precisely 1.91% of all indexed annuity sales as of 4Q2009. So, it is quite disingenuous of you to suggest that indexed annuities are high-commission products. The average street level commission for these products as of 4Q2009 was 6.47%. This modest commission is paid a single time at policy issue and the agent is expected to service the contract for life. Compare this to the consistent, generous commissions that are paid on risk money products such as mutual funds, and I think you’ll have to admit that the commissions on indexed annuities are quite fair.

    Sixth, how is someone earning a commission off of a sale a necessary “conflict of interest?” You are so hung up on this. Is it because you think that a fee-based advisor (perhaps like you) is BETTER? As if fee-based advisors cannot be crooks just as well as any other person in a position of influence over a consumers…Is the compensation arrangement on an indexed annuity any different than a car salesperson? A real estate agent? A shoe salesperson? Do people know that these professionals are going to be paid a commission in exchange for the services rendered? YES. Does that mean that the salesperson is going to only look out for their best interests? NO. Sales jobs are built on relationships; the cornerstone of these relationships is repeat business and referrals. So, if the shoe salesperson sells me a crummy pair of shoes (where they received a high commission), what is my likelihood to suggest that salesperson to my friends and neighbors? What is the likelihood that I’ll buy my next pair of shoes from that same person? Not good in either scenario. I think you get the picture. Insurance agents and financial advisors NEED the client loyalty and referrals. Anyone who makes an inappropriate sale is obviously going to lose out on business, not to mention face potential fines, license revocation, and imprisonment. With that understanding, I think you can agree that agents are not in a position of “conflict” when suggesting indexed annuities to their clients that are risk-averse.

    Seventh, there is no indexed annuity that pays the agent a 12% bonus and pays the agent a 10% commission. In fact, only two of the five products that pay a commission that high have a bonus at all. A lack of fact-checking has embarrassed you yet again, Mr. Voudrie.

    Eighth, there isn’t “always a catch” with indexed annuities. I’d love for you to elaborate on what you mean by this. If you mean the catch is that the client is protected from market risk while still benefitting from some of the market’s upside-growth, you are RIGHT! That IS a catch, isn’t it?!?

    Ninth, let me drop some knowledge on you and illuminate how ignorant you are when it comes to consumers making complaints to their State Department of Insurance. My company researches consumer complaints by reviewing the National Association of Insurance Commissioner’s (NAIC’s) closed complaint database on an annual basis. Interestingly, the results are as follows:

    –          TOTAL INDEXED ANNUITY COMPLAINTS FOR 2006: 187

    –           TOTAL INDEXED ANNUITY COMPLAINTS FOR 2007: 235

    –           TOTAL INDEXED ANNUITY COMPLAINTS FOR 2008: 220

    –           TOTAL INDEXED ANNUITY COMPLAINTS FOR 2009: 148

    Based on our research, this results in average annual complaints as follows:

    –          AVERAGE INDEXED ANNUITY COMPLAINTS PER COMPANY 2006: 4.35

    –          AVERAGE INDEXED ANNUITY COMPLAINTS PER COMPANY 2007: 4.12

    –          AVERAGE INDEXED ANNUITY COMPLAINTS PER COMPANY 2008: 3.86

    –          AVERAGE INDEXED ANNUITY COMPLAINTS PER COMPANY 2009: 3.29

    So, not only are complaints on indexed annuities very low, but they have been declining each year. Amazing! Quite different from what you suggest, in fact.

    Tenth, I hate to be a killjoy here, but can you show me how the evidence above supports the statement that “millions of seniors are suckered into these products [and] there’s little they can do?” Truth be told, this research directly supports the fact that American consumers are quite pleased with their indexed annuity purchases. Who wouldn’t be? While the market tanked nearly 50% from 2008 to 2009, indexed annuity purchasers were sleeping soundly with the knowledge that their retirement savings were protected from the market downturn. And a little FYI for you- purchasers of indexed annuities do not need to get an attorney involved if they have a complaint about their purchase. They receive a response from their state insurance division typically within two weeks of making the complaint. Hope that helps you for your next rant…

    Eleventh, I would love for an organization like FINRA to evaluate your blanket suggestions that consumers “[withdraw their] penalty-free amount that is available each year and [transfer] that money somewhere else.” Consumer risk tolerance be damned! Who cares what is good for the client? Let’s just put them into the plan that JEFFREY VOUDRIE deems best! How careless and reckless of you, Mr. Voudrie. Hopefully your clients realize that a thorough review needs to be made of each consumer’s finances, age, and risk profile (among other suitability factors) in order to evaluate that they are sold the appropriate product for the retirement needs.

    Twelfth, your lies are despicable. There is NO SINGLE ANNUITY with a 15-year surrender charge that is available to someone aged 89 or older. Therefore, there is no single annuity that would force the client to “have to pay a surrender penalty to get the money if his father dies before age 104.” The longest surrender charge available to an 89-year old client is ten years. Whatever happened to integrity, Jeffrey? You obviously have none as you not only forego fact-checking, but publish blatantly false information at the expense of American consumers.

    Overall, I really do find you hilarious. Your pitches for indexed annuities are dead-on. Yes, indexed annuities do offer premium bonuses. Yes, they do protect the client from the risks of the stock market. Yes, they do provide a minimum guarantee even if the market crashes. You could promote indexed annuities, Jeffrey!

    In the end, you are right on one thing- indexed annuities are “an easy sale for the advisor.” What financial product could be more appealing than an indexed annuity that provides principal protection, a minimum guarantee, no risk as a result of market declines, and the potential for limited upside-interest potential based on the market’s growth? My person opinion is that NOTHING competes to the value proposition of an indexed annuity.

    Honestly, I am getting quite tired of reading your ignorant sputtering, Jeffrey. People laugh when they forward it to me, asking what your credentials are. Aren’t you concerned that your clients and prospective clients will think you are uneducated if you get even the basic facts wrong about insurance products? How credible do you think you appear when you post information on a public website that is so blatantly incorrect? I would advise you do some soul-searching on this issue. As long as there are ignorant people like you out there, spouting inaccurate information about indexed annuities, I will be here. It is my mission to ensure that the record is set straight on these products, and if that means that I have to respond to every one of your senseless blogs, so be it.

    Should you have a need for accurate information on these products at any time in the future, do not hesitate to reach out to us. I am always happy to help ANYONE who has a need for FACTS on these products.

    Thank you.

    P.S. Ask us about our new TOTALLY FREE website, www.IndexedAnnuityNerd.com!

    Sheryl J. Moore

    President and CEO

    AnnuitySpecs.com

    LifeSpecs.com

    IndexedAnnuityNerd.com

    Advantage Group Associates, Inc.

    (515) 262-2623 office

    (515) 313-5799 cell

    (515) 266-4689 fax

    Originally Posted at GuardingYourWealth on March 17, 2010 by Sheryl J. Moore.

    Categories: Negative Media

    6 responses to “Response: Annuities? Give Me a Break!”

    1. JA says:

      Assuming this webpage is still current, I find your attitude towards annuity abuse revolting, in light of the experience I had with a deceptive agent who put me into a financial bind that is unrecoverable. You might take a second look and learn why annuities are not right for everyone and why industry standards should be commonized across the board with rigorous agent training, consumer awareness of contracts and layman language, and tighter state enforcement so every insurance company AND agent is singing from the same songsheet and not leveraging state loopholes for their own personal, financial fortification. Good luck.

      • JA,
        I respect your opinion and I certainly empathize with your circumstances. However, what happened to you does not happen with the vast majority of consumers that purchase annuities. Time Life released an article this summer that said the first person to live to be 120 is already walking the earth today. The number one fear of Americans is now outliving one’s retirement. An annuity is the only financial product that can guarantee an income that one cannot outlive.

        Considering that Social Security (which, by the way, is an annuity), is only intended to provide approximately 40% of one’s retirement income, I would argue that EVERYONE needs an annuity. As to what kind, that depends on the individual, their goals, and their needs.

        Ultimately, no market is perfect. There are bad apples in every barrel. However, that is a big reason that I am out here doing what I do.

        Thanks! sjm

    2. Lyndol Anderson says:

      Sheryl, Good Morning from Texas.
      I have read your rebuttal to this article and I agree with your statements. However, I have a small issue with your point number 4 part 6. All though you are technically right, I got the impression from your statement and tone of your message that the full account value is paid immediately at the death of the contract owner for all FIA’s. I know of a couple of contracts that do not. Allianz Master Dex 10 comes to mind for example.
      I should also tell you that I am a true believer in FIA’s and submit over a million dollars of premium a year by myself along with several IUL contracts.
      Lyndol Anderson

      • Good morning, Lyndol. I appreciate your response.

        Not sure what your problems are with points four through six, but I am happy to address if you have concerns. I assure you of the accuracy of the information. I think you misunderstand the death benefit on the MasterDex 10- it does pay the full account value at death. Some of the old MasterDex contracts and two-tiered products that are no longer available for sale DID require that the beneficiary take at least a five-year payout to get the full account value. There are no products available today that have such a provision.

        Keep up the good work protecting American’s money with safe money products, Lyndol! sjm

    3. Doug Arendell says:

      Great rebuttal article, Sheryl! You tell it like it is…

    currency