We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (15,832)
  • Industry Conferences (3)
  • Industry Job Openings (9)
  • Negative Media (135)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (586)
  • Sheryl's Blogs (166)
  • Wink's Articles (222)
  • Wink's Blogs (208)
  • Wink's Press Releases (92)
  • Blog Archives

  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Full Disclosure Indexed UL Report

    April 8, 2010 by Roger L. Blease

    Published 4/5/2010 

    Full Disclosure covers universal life insurance products twice yearly and features both fixed and indexed policies. This excerpt includes one of the illustration scenarios featured in Full Disclosure, an extract featuring long-term guaranteed minimum premiums (for those that offer them), and a listing of each product’s policy design objectives. This report features indexed policies only. Traditional universal life was covered in the March 15 issue. All data is current as of January 1, 2010.

    One of the challenges in evaluating indexed UL products is determining how the individual pricing components affect policyholder values. An illustration can help, but different features, caps and participation rates affect the amount of gain the policy experiences due to gains in the underlying index. There are potentially complex combinations of these that can make two illustrations under scrutiny as different as night and day. Products are also priced at sometimes dramatically different premium funding levels as well as optimal indexing and crediting method combinations.

    For these, and other reasons, benchmarking indexed products to get some idea of their competitive position in the marketplace, is tricky–especially when examining only slivers of data. Some of our users have challenged the idea of trying to standardize parameters, such as the premium level, used in developing the illustrations. But we believe that without some level of standardization, albeit one that may penalize products designed for either end of a bell curve of performance, you are left with data anarchy that is less useful for comparative purposes. We recommend using these illustrations, in conjunction with a wide range of information pertaining to the policy itself to get the best results.

    The main chart in this excerpt includes illustrated values on a current basis based on a male age 40 with a best nonsmoker class (representing at least 15% of the contracts issued) paying a $7,500 annual premium and a $1,000,000 policy. If our specified premium of $7,500 is too low to illustrate the policy for this age and face amount, the policies are blended with term insurance if available. The death benefit type is level; however, a column is included with a true increasing death benefit for each policy to indicate which are designed to generate maximum death benefits.

    Internal rate of return (IRR) figures included in the main chart indicate which products are designed to be more efficient in producing cash values, death benefits, or providing an all-around solution. The IRR can be applied to cash values as well as death benefits, and we have chosen to measure both at a policy duration of 30 years. Those seeking to analyze the relationship between cash values and death benefits will find the IRR measurement a useful tool. It’s easy to see, using the provided IRRs, which policies are built to generate death benefits, which is why it would be unfair to compare them under a level death benefit only.

    Included at the end of the current illustration chart are the minimum level premium on a current basis to endow the policy (cash value equals death benefit at maturity) and minimum premium to carry it (cash value equals lowest cash values at maturity). Also featured is the indexing option rate and crediting method used to derive the illustration. Illustrations were requested using indexing options and crediting methods reflecting how the policies are most often sold, but some policies offer a plethora of options designed to further tailor the product to the investment and risk expectation of the client.

    The simple, yet increasingly challenging, key to good analysis of indexed products is that the more information you can get the better. A sample policy is important to use with any illustration as is asking the right questions of your wholesaler, or better yet, the company being illustrated. It is tempting to highlight the best parts of the contract while ignoring elements that are confusing or less attractive. A “whole contract” policy analysis shows how the puzzle pieces of indexing option, crediting method, participation rate, caps on gains, illustration rates, and everything else in the complex puzzle, fits together.

     Current Indexed Universal Life Policy Illustrated Values

     Indexed Universal Life Lifetime/Age 121/Age 100

     Indexed Universal Life Design Objectives

    Originally Posted at National Underwriter on April 5, 2010 by Roger L. Blease.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency