We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Why Can’t We Be A Self-Policing Industry?

    April 19, 2010 by Sheryl J. Moore

    When I started speaking to large groups about five years ago, I would usually include slides in my presentations that talked about the top-selling products, regulatory trends, and upcoming changes to product designs. Now keep in mind, the market environment was much different then. It seemed like every other company was being sued in a class action suit (no, lawyers never get tired of money) and negative media was DEFINITELY in the headlines (senior suitability, anyone?). At that time, many of the product designs in the fixed and indexed annuity markets contributed to bad agent behavior. There were alot of products with big bonuses, big commissions, and big surrender charges (relative to today). The products were not necessarily bad in and of themselves. It is just that they were easily manipulated to suit the needs of the ill-informed or ill-intentioned. (And by the way, I own one of those big surrender charge/big bonus products, which just goes to show that they are definitely suitable for some people!)

    Ultimately, the agents in these seminars would ask always ask, “Why does the insurance commissioner approve these products if they cause so many problems?”

    My response, “Because every product is suitable for SOMEONE. It is not up to the commissioner to determine suitability; it is your responsibility to determine suitability.”

    They would then follow-up, perplexed with, “Then why do insurance companies develop and file such products with the insurance commissioner?”

    Sadly, I would have to respond with, “Well- quite frankly, they do it because you will sell it.”

    Isn’t that a shame? At times, profitability and sales have taken precedence over the client and even the agent. I will give you that things are alot different today. I may not like the 10/10 rule, or how it limits consumer’s choices. However, I do have to admit that alot of the suitability issues with annuities have disappeared down the drain along with extended surrender charge products. Further regulatory action has helped, and so has increased disclosure. But should we really be forced into compliance?

    The truth is finally spreading about indexed annuities: negative media is not nearly as prevalent. Complaints on the products have never been lower, and product designs are simple and consumer-friendly as a whole today.

    But there are still a couple of products out there that are disappointing. Agents may have trouble understanding the products which can lead to miscommunication to the client. Who ends up being “on the hook” in the end when the lawyers come calling? The agent. Of course the insurance company has done a fine job exponging themselves of any responsibility (their forms and disclosures clearly explained how that product functioned!) in nearly all cases. In the end, however, products like this hurt us all.

    After all of the hard work I have done over the past five years, ensuring that the reputation of indexed annuities is based on accurate information, it scares me to think that a couple of products (that coincidentally do not sell so well) could put us in a position to take a step back in terms of this reputation.

    If you are a company looking to develop such a product, you can count on two things:

    1. I will not work with you in your product development endeavors, and

    2. What comes around goes around

    Ultimately, everyone pays a price for shady business practices. When you consciously make a decision to market a questionable product, you are no better than a sneaky snake oil salesman. Such practices nearly always seem to come full circle whether it be through fines, lawsuits, or merely targeted negative media. I will not contribute to it, but I will not endorse it either.

    It is just unfortunate that all of us tend to bear the ‘scarlet letter’ label when you forge ahead with such designs.

    THINK ABOUT IT. sjm

    Originally Posted on April 19, 2010 by Sheryl J. Moore.

    currency