We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (15,878)
  • Industry Conferences (3)
  • Industry Job Openings (9)
  • Negative Media (135)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (587)
  • Sheryl's Blogs (166)
  • Wink's Articles (222)
  • Wink's Blogs (209)
  • Wink's Press Releases (92)
  • Blog Archives

  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Suitability: The Rules Are Changing

    May 19, 2010 by John L. Olsen

    Published 4/29/2010 

    It used to be that the rules governing when an annuity recommendation was considered “suitable” depended upon whether the annuity in question was a variable contract.

    Variable annuities, as insurance products, were regulated by state departments of insurance. As securities, VAs were also subject to the rules of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the regulations of state securities offices, and the policies of the seller’s broker-dealer.

    On the other hand, sales of non-variable annuities—that is, fixed annuities—were regulated only by state departments of insurance (and did not have to be sold through broker-dealers, even when the seller was a registered representative affiliated with a broker-dealer).

    The suitability rules applying to VAs were generally stricter than those applying to fixed annuities.

    Some of that is still true. Variable annuities are still securities, regulated by FINRA rules; and state insurance regulators still exercise authority over both variable and non-variable annuity sales.

    But revisions to the Suitability In Annuity Transactions Model Regulation, approved in late March 2010 by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, will change things considerably—for agents who sell fixed annuities (in states that adopt this regulation) and for the insurers who offer fixed annuities.

    The new rule mandates completion, within six months of its effective date, of a four-hour training course on annuities. Insurers must verify agents’ completion of this course before permitting them to sell any annuity, except contracts used to fund individual retirement accounts, qualified plans, deferred compensation arrangements, or structured settlements.

    In other words, it applies to nearly all “non-qualified” annuities. It requires that insurers review all annuity transactions, and it makes them responsible for compliance with the regulation, even if they hire a third party firm to monitor compliance.

    It specifies 12 factors that must be taken into account by an agent recommending any annuity, prior to making that recommendation. (See box.)

    If these factors look familiar to readers who are familiar with FINRA rules governing variable annuity sales, they should. These are the same 12 factors cited in paragraph (b)(2) of NASD Rule 2821 (now FINRA Rule 2330).

    The regulation further states that “insurance producers” (agents and brokers) or insurers (where no producer was involved) must have “reasonable grounds” for believing that the annuity buyer has been informed of the features of the annuity–including surrender charges and schedules, potential tax penalties, fees, limitations on investment returns and insurance components, and that “the particular annuity as a whole” is suitable for that buyer, in light of all these factors.

    This amounts to a significantly higher standard of “suitability” for fixed annuity sales than is now required in many states, and closely approaches the standard applicable to sales of VA contracts.

    Another dimension of change—and one that many producers may not even be aware of—involves the “source of funds” used to purchase an annuity.

    In some states, a producer must hold a securities license if he or she recommends that an annuity be funded by a distribution from a security (such as a stock or mutual fund). In at least one state, this is true even if the producer did not suggest that distribution.

    And then there’s the whole business of index annuities. At present, these products are not securities, because the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Rule 151A was rejected by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals for what amounted to a technical flaw. The SEC may or may not cure the defect and reassert this rule. (Two bills before Congress would trump that by declaring that index annuities are not “securities,” but they are still only bills.)

    In this environment of uncertainty, many broker-dealers now require that their registered reps submit, through the broker-dealer, all index annuity sales, and impose the same compliance rules to those sales that the broker-dealer employs for securities sales.

    Simply to avoid the uncertainties, some insurers are registering newly-developed index annuities as securities.

    Finally, there is the “F word”—fiduciary. Although the financial services reform bill currently being debated in the Senate does not apply a fiduciary standard to insurance agents, stockbrokers, and others whose advisory activities are “incidental” to the sale of insurance or investment products, there remains considerable interest, in the financial and regulatory communities, in imposing some form of that standard upon product sellers—potentially including annuity producers.

    John L. Olsen, CLU, ChFC, AEP, is principal of Olsen Financial Group, Kirkwood, Mo. His e-mail address is jolsen02@earthlink.net.

    Originally Posted at National Underwriter on April 29, 2010 by John L. Olsen.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency