We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (16,574)
  • Industry Conferences (3)
  • Industry Job Openings (37)
  • Negative Media (138)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (618)
  • Sheryl's Blogs (175)
  • Wink's Articles (242)
  • Wink's Blogs (258)
  • Wink's Press Releases (93)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Response: It’s Right for the SEC to Regulate Annuity Products

    August 2, 2010 by Sheryl J. Moore

    PDF for Setting it Straight with Christopher Cox

     

    ORIGINAL ARTICLE CAN BE FOUND AT: It’s Right for the SEC to Regulate Annuity Products

    The following comment was posted on www.wsj.com in response to the Letter to the Editor below and submitted as its own Letter to the Editor:

    Dear Christopher Cox,

    I am sorry to say that you are misinformed on indexed annuities, as many of your securities cohorts are. I do not blame you, as the misinformation in the media is astronomical.

    The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals found that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s interpretation of ‘annuity contract’ was reasonable under Chevron, but that the SEC failed to properly consider the effect of Rule 151A upon efficiency, competition and capital formation [as required by section 2(b) of the Act].

    Furthermore, the Court vacated Rule 151A because the SEC’s section 2(b) analysis was ‘arbitrary and capricious.’ So, while it is true that the court found SEC’s interpretation of ‘annuity contract’ to be reasonable, they also found that SEC didn’t do all the work necessary to prove that they were in a position to regulate indexed annuities as securities.

    You are right that the Court gave the SEC the opportunity to remedy their non-compliance with administrative procedures. However, the SEC did not remedy it. Did you ever consider that regulating indexed annuities as securities WOULD NOT improve competition, capital formation, and efficiency in this market? It wouldn’t; in fact the threat of securities regulation has had the exact opposite effect in this market.

    The only risk one has with an indexed annuity IS making more money than expected. All annuity contracts have surrender charges where the client can receive less than their original deposit if they cash surrender in the early years of the contract. This “risk” is not something unique to indexed annuities and it is clearly disclosed in every annuity sales transaction.

    While you are quick to allude that the SEC’s “bipartisan commission” took 151A “seriously,” you failed to recognize the others that took the issue seriously as well. You are able to claim the support of “provincial and territorial securities regulators in North America and others,” but you are not able to say that someone NOT vested in indexed annuities being regulated as securities lent support to the SEC’s position. Only securities regulators who would gain with additional responsibilities and fees, insurance companies that sell products competing against indexed annuities, and a trade group of companies that sell mutual funds (which also compete for the same retirement dollars as indexed annuities). Astoundingly, those supporting the insurance industry in their efforts to secure the fixed insurance status of indexed annuities include: 

    1. Insurance companies (both those who do and do not sell indexed annuities)
    2. Insurance regulators
    3. Marketing organizations and broker dealers
    4. Trade groups
    5. 80.44% of those who submitted the 4,448 comments on 151A
    6. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals
    7. Congress
    8. People who own indexed annuities

    It is scary to me that a person who once-held a position as high as Commissioner of the SEC could have the facts so wrong about a retirement product. Indexed annuities do not have “huge” penalties. There are indexed annuities with surrender charges as short as three years. The average first-year penalty (which declines thereafter) on indexed annuities is a mere 10.61%. Every indexed annuity allows 10% of the annuity’s value to be withdrawn without penalties on an annual basis; some allow as much as 50% to be withdrawn in a single year! Plus, 9 out of 10 indexed annuities provide a waiver of the surrender charges, should the annuitant need access to their money in events such as nursing home confinement, terminal illness, disability, and even unemployment. Consider the fact that these products pay the full account value to the beneficiary upon death, and I think that you’ll see that consumers have tremendous ability to “get their money when they need it” with indexed annuities. These are some of the most liquid retirement income products available today!

    You fail to realize that the insurance commissioners and insurance companies that allow insurance agents to be licensed and contracted to sell indexed annuities do not allow those “convicted of criminal securities fraud” and other similar situations to obtain such licensing/contracting to do so. Insurance regulation is different, Mr. Cox- it isn’t inferior! The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) does all of the regulatory work that the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority performs and then some (including insurer solvency, which so many think is their sole responsibility). The NAIC also has strict regulations on product disclosure, antifraud, suitability, market conduct, standard non-forfeiture values, advertising guidelines, and more. The states hold the authority to take sanctions against insurance agents including, but not limited to, license revocation, penalties and fines. Have you also considered that insurance purchasers do not need to go through lengthy arbitration, spend money, and wait for an extended period to have their complaints addressed? The insurance division intervenes on behalf of the consumer at no charge. I just hope that you can be open to learning more about regulation on the insurance side; it is most definitely different than what you perceive it to be.

    If you take away all of the misinformation that has been perpetuated in the media for years about these products, and the misperception that a lack of FINRA on the insurance side is equivalent to a lack of regulation, I think that you can see that indexed annuities are so different than you think they are. These misperceptions continued for years until they resulted in the SEC stepping-in to take control of a product which was already adequately controlled. As a result, my firm has been working to correct all of the misinformation in the media about these products and we have made tremendous inroads with reporters and securities entities (if you recall, I am the one who presented you with the actual data on indexed annuity complaints, illuminating the fact that unsuitable sales of these products were not a problem like the SEC thought they were).

    In turn, I would like to offer that if I can ever assist you in your understanding about these valuable insurance products, please do not hesitate to contact me. I am always happy to share the facts about indexed annuities, be it good or bad, with anyone who is curious. Thank you.

    Sheryl J. Moore

    President and CEO

    AnnuitySpecs.com

    LifeSpecs.com

    IndexedAnnuityNerd.com

    Advantage Group Associates, Inc.

    (515) 262-2623 office

    (515) 313-5799 cell

    (515) 266-4689 fax

    Categories: Negative Media
    currency