We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (16,526)
  • Industry Conferences (3)
  • Industry Job Openings (38)
  • Negative Media (138)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (617)
  • Sheryl's Blogs (175)
  • Wink's Articles (241)
  • Wink's Blogs (255)
  • Wink's Press Releases (93)
  • Blog Archives

  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • SEC 151 faces a double-whammy in Washington

    August 3, 2010 by Andy Stonehouse

    Published 8/1/2010   

    After two years of debate, political action and some serious soul-searching on behalf of advisors across the country, the controversial SEC 151A ruling was given the one-two punch in separate moves in the nation’s capital.

    On July 12, a federal appeals court announced that it had opted to side with plaintiffs who had launched a lawsuit questioning the validity of 151A and vacate the ruling entirely. 151A would have required federal oversight of the sale of fixed index annuities (also known as equity indexed annuities) and threatened to considerably transform the business of agents, FMOs and carriers nationwide.

    The three-judge panel at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, hearing the case of American Equity vs SEC, dumped the SEC’s current attempts to regulate the product, although the panel fully admitted that the SEC could attempt to re-float similar legislation in a new form.

    “We grant the petitions insofar as they assert the SEC failed properly to consider the effect of the rule upon efficiency, competition and capital formation,” the panel wrote.”We therefore order that Rule 151A be vacated.” The second and final nail in the coffin, 151A foes hope, is the final Senate adoption of the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which includes an amendment to permanently designate FIAs as state-regulated products.

    The 151A regulation could be undone as part the amendment floated by Democratic Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa, chairman of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, provided that state insurance departments unanimously pass and adhere to NAIC standards on the sale of FIAs. Ten states have yet to do so.

    The larger financial reform act, H.R. 4173, was endorsed by House and Senate committees in late June but was held up for final vote in the Senate and approval by President Obama. The death of a key supporter, Democratic Senator Robert Byrd, also helped delay adoption; at magazine press time in mid-July, the Senate vote was still looming.

    Whatever the case, parties who have been working to overturn 151A since its appearance nearly two years ago say they are hopeful that both of the summer’s legal developments will, for once and for all, do away with 151A. Andy Unkefer, president and CEO of Arizona’s Unkefer and Associates and a key player in the anti-151A battle, says the two political developments should serve to end 151A forever.

    “Now that the Court of Appeals has vacated SEC Rule 151a, you might think the battle is over,” he says. “However, the SEC could attempt to create another, more narrowly defined rule and still capture the product as a registered security. This is why passing the Harkin Amendment is still mission-critical to the insurance industry. The Harkin Amendment clarifies once and for all that Fixed Indexed Annuities are not a security.

    “Also, I believe that the Court’s action is directly related to the fact that the Harkin Amendment was approved by the House and Senate Conference Committees,” he adds. “It is clear that our legislation will become law. The decision of the Court came right on the heels of that work on Capitol Hill. I am certain that this tipped the scales in our favor.”

    Unkefer has been heavily involved in the Coalition for Indexed Products, which hosted a popular anti-151A website and later organized several rounds of lobbying fly-ins in Washington D.C., where producers and industry representatives met with their elected officials.

    He admits that the group’s most important move on the legislative end was to take the advice of several professional lobbyists outside of the industry and to figure out the most direct path to power—other anti-151A efforts such as the Meeks/Price bill had been good first efforts, but Harkin was in a position to actually get something accomplished, he notes. Coupled with the outcome of the lawsuits, the efforts seem to have worked.

    Sheryl Moore, annuity industry advocate and president of Advantage Group Associates, says she also hopes that the passage of the Wall Street Reform act will bring some much-desired closure to the issue.
    “This legislative strategy has always been Plan A and if we want to ensure that indexed annuities will be regulated as fixed insurance product indefinitely, we need to continue that strategy,” she says.

    Originally Posted at Senior Market Advisor on August 1, 2010 by Andy Stonehouse.

    Categories: Sheryl's Articles
    currency