We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,244)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (422)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (804)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • FSOC Releases Danger List

    January 19, 2011 by Arthur D. Postal

    Published 1/18/2011 

    The Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) has come out with the indicators it plans to use to decide whether a large insurer is shaky enough to need the attention of the Federal Reserve Board.

    The criteria the FSOC would use to identify a systemically important troubled insurance company could include:

    • Size.
    • Lack of substitutes for the financial services and products the company provides.
    • Interconnectedness with other financial firms.
    • Leverage.
    • Liquidity risk.
    • Maturity mismatch.
    • Existing regulatory scrutiny.

    The criteria are described in a proposed regulation that the FSOC plans to publish in the Federal Register.

    Each of the proposed critera “reflects a different dimension of a firm’s potential to experience material financial distress, as well as the nature, scope, size, scale, concentration, interconnectedness and mix of the company’s activities,” FSOC officials say.

    THE VOLCKER RULE STUDY

    The FSOC also has released a study on the Volcker Rule – a statute created by Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act that will put limits on the proprietary trading activities, hedge fund investments and private equity fund investments of financial institutions, including systemically important insurers, that benefit from federal deposit insurance or access to the Federal Reserve System discount window.

    The drafters of the rule wanted to discourage financial institutions from gambling with government money while letting them continue to engage in normal asset management and hedging activities.

    “For nonbank financial companies that are supervised by the [Federal Reserve] Board, the Volcker Rule does not expressly prohibit or limit any activities,” FSOC officials say in the Volcker Rule study. “Instead, the Volcker Rule requires that the Board adopt rules imposing additional capital charges or other restrictions on such companies to address the risks and conflicts of interest that the Volcker Rule was designed to address.”

    FSOC officials note that the only insurance companies affected by the Volcker Rule would be those that are affiliates of federally insured banks or thrifts, and those that are supervised by the Federal Reserve Board.

    “The investment activity of insurers is central to the overall insurance business model,” FSOC officials say.

    Insurance company general account investments are permitted if “the appropriate federal banking agencies, after consultation with the [FSOC] and the relevant state insurance commissioners, have not jointly determined that such investment laws, regulations and written guidance are insufficient to protect the safety and soundness of the banking entity, or of the financial stability of the United States,” officials say.

    Federal regulatory agencies will have to come up with an approach for evaluating state insurance investment laws, regulations and guidance, and for working with the FSOC and state insurance regulators to determine whether the investment laws, regulations or guidance in a specific state are so weak that they threaten the soundness of a banking entity or the financial stability of the United States, officials say.

    The term “general account” is not statutorily defined but is “a fairly well recognized insurance accounting term of art,” officials say. “A general account represents all assets of the insurer that are available to satisfy its overall obligations.It does not include any separate account assets.”

    Federal regulatory agencies “should consider how insurance companies invest separately on behalf of customers” and avoid defining insurance company separate account products as hedge funds or private equity funds, officials say.

    “One approach may be for Agencies to design, by rule, a process by which insurance companies can request an interpretative determination of whether particular separate accounts and products qualify under the definition of hedge or private equity fund,” officials say.

    THE MISSING FSOC MEMBER

    The Property Casualty Insurers Association of America (PCI), Des Plaines, Ill., has pointed out that the Obama administration has not yet nominated the statutorily required FSOC insurance voting member.

    The Dodd-Frank Act requires the insurance voting member to be

    “an independent member appointed by the president, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, having insurance expertise.”

    The panel is also supposed to have two other insurance officials as non-voting members. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners, Kansas City, Mo., has appointed John Huff, Missouri commissioner, to be its non-voting representative on the council.

    The Treasury Department has not yet hired the other non-voting FSOC insurance member — the director of the new Federal Insurance Office (FIO).

    Insurance industry officials believe that the top candidate for the voting insurance member seat is S. Roy Woodall, a former Kentucky insurance commissioner who is now a Treasury Department consultant.

    Woodall, a Republican, has been president of the National Association of Life Companies. He also worked on state issues at the American Council of Life Insurers, Washington, and later was an assistant secretary of the Treasury for financial institutions during the Bush administration.

    But highly-placed industry sources say Neal Wolin, a deputy Treasury secretary who was a top executive at Hartford Financial Services Group Inc., Hartford (NYSE:HIG), has indicated that the Obama administration is apparently “not far along” in determining who should be nominated for the insurance voting member slot.

    “While we do not want to see the important work of the FSCOC delayed, we also don’t want critically important decisions affecting the insurance industry made without the appropriate and legally required participation of insurance experts,” PCI President David Sampson says.The Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) has come out with the indicators it plans to use to decide whether a large insurer is shaky enough to need the attention of the Federal Reserve Board.

    Originally Posted at National Underwriter on January 18, 2011 by Arthur D. Postal.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency