We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!


media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us


Close [x]

Industry News


  • Industry Articles (21,608)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (444)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (811)
  • Wink's Articles (360)
  • Wink's Inside Story (277)
  • Wink's Press Releases (125)
  • Blog Archives

  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Tax Reform Gives Premium Financing The “Pilates” Treatment

    April 11, 2011 by Chris Layeux & Peter L. McCarthy

    Chris Layeux & Peter L. McCarthy
    April 2011 Issue

    Pilates sessions are famous for increasing physical strength and flexibility. The gift tax provisions of the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization and Job Creation Act of 2010 (TRA 2010) have this effect on life insurance premium financing. As a result, premium financing cases have the potential to be easier than ever in 2011 and 2012. This article discusses how the act adds new temporary flexibility to premium financing arrangements.

    What Is Premium Financing?

    Premium financing is a wealth transfer/estate liquidity strategy that has the potential to help wealthy people meet their estate liquidity needs and transfer more wealth to their children and grandchildren. This strategy is best suited to people who are quite wealthy and who do not wish to use their own funds to pay policy premiums. (See the Profile of a Suitable Premium Financing Prospect)

    Profile of a Suitable Premium Financing Prospect

    Premium financing is not for everyone; it is a complex transaction which carries a variety of risks.

    A suitable premium financing prospect should meet these criteria:

    •  Has a need for life insurance death protection
    •  Has a net worth in excess of $5 million
    •  Has liquid assets to pledge as security for the premium loans
    •  Meets company underwriting guidelines
    •  Satisfies the lender’s minimum requirements
    •  Has access to knowledgeable tax and legal advisors

    In a premium financing arrangement, a wealthy person creates an irrevocable life insurance trust (ILIT) which purchases a large life insurance policy insuring his life. The ILIT trustee borrows money to pay the policy premiums from a bank or other commercial lender. The policy is collaterally assigned to the lender as security for repayment of the loan. As part of the lending arrangement, the insured may be required to pledge additional collateral that is acceptable to the lender to fully secure the loan. If the loan is still outstanding at the insured’s death, the death benefit proceeds repay the outstanding loan balance and the remaining death benefits are paid to the ILIT so they can be distributed as directed by the trust agreement.

    Why Do Wealthy People
    Use Premium Financing?

    Most suitable premium financing prospects have enough assets to pay their own premiums. Why do they choose to borrow the premium dollars from a commercial entity if they can afford to pay them themselves? There are a number of good reasons why some wealthy people decide to use outside funds to pay their life insurance premiums, including:
    1. They may be asset-rich but cash poor. That is, their assets may be tied up in a variety of fixed or illiquid investments and cannot be easily converted into cash.

    2. Converting assets into cash may trigger a variety of taxes, costs and fees such as: capital gains taxes, management fees and sales commissions. The extra costs, taxes and complexity of selling assets to create cash for premium dollars can make premium financing easier and more efficient than personally paying the premiums.

    3. They may wish to save their cash and liquid assets for other purposes or to keep them available to deal with possible future crises and financial emergencies.

    4. They may like the idea of using money other than their own to pay life insurance premiums because they can maintain control of their assets rather than spending them and losing any growth or earnings potential.

    5. Borrowing premium dollars may be inexpensive relative to other available options in today’s low interest rate environment.

    6. Until TRA 2010, gifting limits may not have been high enough to allow direct gifting to be an effective alternative option for paying policy premiums.

    7. Commercial loans generally do not create a gift by the client to his trust; consequently, considerable gift tax savings may potentially be realized.

    Favorable New Gift Tax
    Rules for 2011 and 2012

    TRA 2010 significantly expands the tax free gifting limits in 2011 and 2012. Effective January 1, 2011, the act increased the lifetime gift tax exemption from $1 million to $5 million per donor for two calendar years. The generation skipping transfer (GST) tax exemption limit also increased from $1 million to $5 million. Gifts and GST transfers exceeding these limits are potentially subject to gift and GST taxes at a maximum rate of only 35 percent. The increases in these limits have the potential to make premium financing arrangements much more flexible through 2012.

    The expansion of the gift and GST limits offers wealthy individuals and married couples a wonderful opportunity to efficiently transfer more of their wealth to their children and grandchildren by making lifetime gifts before January 1, 2013. Individuals have an increase of $4 million in gifting capacity over what they could give in previous years. Married couples have an increased gifting capacity of $8 million. Individuals who haven’t yet used any of their lifetime gift tax exemption could give up to $5 million, while married couples could give away up to $10 million if neither spouse has previously used any lifetime gifting exemption.

    Life Insurance Sales Opportunities
    for Wealthy Clients

    Parents and grandparents who are in good health and who can afford to make lifetime gifts have been given what may be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity over the next two years. The increase in both the gift tax and GST exemptions to $5 million creates unique potential to pass on large amounts of wealth to younger generations. Gifts to GST trusts have the potential to accumulate and distribute family wealth outside the federal transfer tax system for several generations (the exact length of time depends on a variety of factors, including state law). When life insurance is used as a trust asset, it may be possible to leverage those gifts into additional wealth for the trust beneficiaries.

    New Premium Financing Arrangements

    New premium financing arrangements could be quite attractive to wealthy individuals and families. The ability to combine their expanded gifting and GST exemptions with funds their ILIT trustees may borrow from commercial lenders could significantly increase the amount of wealth they could potentially transfer outside the transfer tax system. At the same time, their premium financing arrangements could possibly be more flexible and efficient.

    A hypothetical case may help make this clear. Let’s assume James Smith (age 65) needs $15 million of life insurance coverage to meet his estate liquidity needs. He has never used any of his gift tax lifetime exemptions, and he wants to establish a premium financing arrangement to cover the $900,000 annual premium cost. He creates an ILIT to own the life insurance policy. These are some of the flexible design alternatives potentially available to him:

    1. Gift $1 million in cash to the trust in 2011 so the trustee has funds to pay the annual interest due on the outstanding loan balance.

    2. Gift $3 million in additional cash to the trust in 2011 to reduce the total amount of premiums that need to be borrowed and the amount of required outside collateral he will have to put up to finalize the loan.

    3. Gift an additional $2 million to the trust in 2012 which the trustee may use to pay down the outstanding loan balance; this may also reduce or eliminate the need for outside collateral.

    4. Gift $1 million in income-producing property to the trust in 2011; the trustee may use the income to pay interest and/or possibly pay off part of the outstanding loan balance.

    5. In either 2011 or 2012 create a 10-year grantor retained annuity trust (GRAT) funded with $10 million in assets. The ILIT would be the remainder beneficiary of the GRAT and, after 10 years, the GRAT would end and the ILIT would receive the GRAT’s remaining assets, which the trustee could use to pay down or pay off the outstanding loan balance. If the Section 7520 rate is 3 percent, the gift tax value of a 10 year, $10 million GRAT paying out 6 percent annually to the grantor is $4,881,800.

    Existing Premium
    Financing Arrangements

    TRA 2010’s increased gifting limits give new flexibility to premium financing arrangements already in place. Wealthy clients have new potential opportunities to change or enhance premium financing arrangements they implemented years ago. To envision some of the possibilities, let’s assume that James Smith’s financing arrangement for his $15 million policy was put in place five years ago and that the current loan balance is $4.5 million. These are some of the new options he has for managing the arrangement:

    1. Gift $4.5 million in cash to the trust in 2011 so the trustee can retire the outstanding loan balance.

    2. Gift $1 million in cash to the trust in 2011 so the trustee has funds to pay the annual loan interest.

    3. Gift $2 million in cash to the trust in either 2011 or 2012 so the trustee can pay back part of the loan balance (with a possible reduction in the amount of required outside collateral). The trustee may also retain part of the gift to pay annual interest costs on the reduced loan balance.

    4. Gift up to $5 million in income-producing property to the trust before the end of 2012; the trustee may use the income to pay interest on the outstanding loan balance.

    Premium financing arrangements can be complex and involve a number of risks. The act’s expanded gifting limits also create life insurance funding alternatives outside of premium financing. Because gifts in 2011 and 2012 have a much higher exemption limit, some clients may decide to bypass the complexity and risks of premium financing altogether.

    Three available premium financing alternatives include:
    1. Make Large Cash Gifts Directly to the ILIT.
    In Smith’s case, he could give up to $5 million directly to his ILIT over the next two years (assuming no prior use of his lifetime gifting exemption). The trustee could use these funds to pay policy premiums. If Smith is married, his spouse could agree to “split gift” with him and allow the use of part or all of her $5 million lifetime exemption to be applied to the gift. Thus, together they have the ability to supply the ILIT with up to $10 million gift tax free to pay premiums.

    2. Create a Private Loan Arrangement. Instead of making large gifts to the ILIT, Smith could decide to lend the trustee the premium dollars himself. These transactions are known as private loan arrangements. The trustee and grantor enter into an arms-length loan agreement, using reasonable terms and setting a fair market interest rate. Smith would lend the trustee the premiums under the loan arrangement’s terms. In addition to lending the trust the premium dollars, Smith could make a lump sum cash gift to the trust so the trustee has funds to pay him interest on the outstanding loan.

    3. Use a Gift/Private Loan Combination. Mr. Smith could also decide to use both gifting and private loans together in an integrated strategy. This combination approach could be useful if Smith’s remaining gifting exemption is not large enough to cover the needed premium dollars or if he wants to have the option of getting back some of his premium dollars if his financial circumstances change, the tax law changes, or be becomes dissatisfied with the life insurance policy. An example of this combination strategy would be for Smith to gift the trust $5 million in 2011 and lend it $1 million annually for each of the next five years.

    The two year expanded gifting window created by TRA 2010 continues the long term uncertainty around wealth transfer planning. TRA 2010 provisions are temporary and expire at the end of 2012. Clients who can benefit from life insurance policies with large death benefits often borrow the dollars needed to pay premiums from commercial lenders in premium financing arrangements. The act’s expanded lifetime gifting limits appear to create temporary opportunities for premium financing clients to make their arrangements more flexible and potentially more efficient. The expanded gifting limits may allow them to reduce how much their trusts have to borrow to pay premiums and give them cash to pay interest on outstanding loans. The expanded gifting limits may also give them the opportunity to avoid premium financing arrangements altogether.

    Now is a great time to show suitable clients and their tax and legal advisors how the new “pilates-like” flexibility in premium financing arrangements can enhance their wealth transfer planning.

    These materials are not intended to and cannot be used to avoid tax penalties and they were prepared to support the promotion or marketing of the matters addressed in this document. Each taxpayer should seek advice from an independent tax advisor.

    Author’s Bio
    Chris Layeux
    is the director of premium financing and advanced case design for the ING life insurance companies. He began his career in the financial services industry in 1983 and has worked with several companies in a variety of positions including advanced case consultant, agent and brokerage manager. He has extensive knowledge of non-qualified deferred compensation and estate planning. Layeux joined ING in 2003 as a member of its advanced case design team and, in 2005, was promoted to the advanced sales team to maximize ING’s premium financing sales. He is a published author and a popular speaker at local and national industry events. He is a past director of the Minneapolis/St. Paul Chapter of the Society of Financial Service Professionals. Layeux can be reached at ING, 20 Washington Avenue South 5750, Minneapolis, MN 55401. Telephone: 612-342-7699. Email: chris.layeux@us.ing.com.

    Peter L. McCarthy, JD, MBA, CLU, ChFC
    JD, MBA, CLU, ChFC, is a senior advanced sales consultant for ING’s life sales support. He has more than 20 years of experience in advanced marketing and has previously worked as advanced sales counsel for Minnesota Life, Prudential Insurance Company, and American Express Financial Advisors. McCarthy practiced law as an estate planning attorney with a large Minneapolis law firm. He earned his JD degree from the University of Miami (FL) School of Law and an MBA from Rollins College. McCarthy can be reached at ING, 20 Washington Avenue South #5750, Minneapolis, MN 55401. Telephone: 612-342-7699. Email: peter.mccarthy @us.ing.com.

    Originally Posted at Broker World on April 1, 2011 by Chris Layeux & Peter L. McCarthy.

    Categories: Industry Articles