We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!


media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us


Close [x]

Industry News


  • Industry Articles (17,444)
  • Industry Conferences (3)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (189)
  • Negative Media (139)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (648)
  • Wink's Articles (257)
  • Wink's Inside Story (230)
  • Wink's Press Releases (97)
  • Blog Archives

  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • RETIRING: Retirees Need Less Stocks, More Annuities

    July 11, 2011 by Robert Powell

    By Robert Powell, A DOW JONES COLUMN

    Less stocks, more annuities. That, in essence, is the advice gleaned from two
    just-published reports for the benefit of those living in or approaching

    Retirees should invest just 5% to 25% of their portfolios in stocks, or at
    least that’s the case for those whose primary goal is to minimize the risk of
    running out of money and sustaining their withdrawals, said one report published
    by Putnam Investments new think tank.

    And, Americans can avoid the risk of outliving their assets by saving more,
    working longer, investing wisely, delaying Social Security and buying a life
    annuity, according the Government Accountability Office.

    For his part, W. Van Harlow, Ph.D., CFA charterholder and director of
    research at the Putnam Institute, is suggesting a conservative asset mix largely
    because of what he views as the greatest risk to a retiree’s portfolio: the
    unfavorable “sequence of returns” in the securities’ markets.

    That’s a fancy way of saying retirees who have too much money in equities
    face the very risk that the stock market will keep falling at the very same time
    they are withdrawing money for their accounts. And that doing so increases the
    odds that they will outlive their money or, more likely, reduce their
    withdrawals and presumably their standard of living. (By the way, many retirees
    experienced this risk firsthand from 2000-2009. So it’s not one of those risks
    that people talk about, but never have to face in reality.)

    In an interview, Harlow noted that once a retiree starts taking money from
    their retirement accounts, the withdrawals become “path dependent.” And if the
    success of a retirement income plan rests on whether the markets go up or down,
    one has to figure out how to protect oneself against that volatility, and
    especially against the risk of unfavorable “sequence of returns.” And the best
    way to do that is by reducing one’s overall exposure to equity to no more than
    25%, he said.

    Harlow also took issue with many life-cycle, or so-called target-date, mutual
    funds in the marketplace today, suggesting that many have far too much invested
    in equities. “The higher equity allocations used in many popular retirement
    investment products today significantly underestimate the risks that these
    higher-volatility portfolios pose to the sustainability of retirees’ savings and
    to the incomes they depend on,” he said in a release. His advice to retirees who
    own or plan to buy a target-date fund is to check the asset allocation of those

    By way of background, we should note that very few retirees and would-be
    retirees own just one mutual fund which also happens to be a life-cycle or
    target-date fund. In fact, investors saving for retirement in a 401(k) often own
    many funds, one of which might be a life-cycle fund. The research does suggest,
    however, that would-be retirees do face the risk of unfavorable sequence of
    returns given their mix of assets in their retirement accounts.

    On average, according to a recent Investment Company Institute report, 401(k)
    plan participants in their 60s have about 50% of their money in equities, spread
    among a mix of stock, life-cycle and balanced mutual funds, as well as company
    stock. What isn’t so well known, though, is the percent that represents of a
    retiree’s or would-be retiree’s total portfolio, or what it might represent if
    you factored in the net present value of, say, a defined benefit plan, or Social
    Security, or the net present value of any earnings a retiree might generate. In
    other words, that 50% might be just 5% of a total portfolio or it might be 75%.

    So, using Putnam’s research as your guide, any overall portfolio where the
    percent allocated to stocks greater than 25% would be subject to the risk of
    unfavorable sequence of returns.

    Meanwhile, the 79-page GAO report, which was undertaken by at the request of
    Sen. Herb Kohl, D-Wisc., the chairman of the Special Senate Committee on Aging,
    details how Americans can avoid the risk of outliving their savings.

    In the study, the GAO found that while most retirees rely primarily on Social
    Security, most Americans fail to maximize their benefits. An estimated 72.8%
    took benefits before age 65, and only 14.1% took benefits the month they reached
    full retirement age. By taking the benefits on or before their 63rd birthday,
    nearly half — 49.5% — passed up at least 25% to 33% in additional monthly
    inflation-adjusted benefits that would have been available had they waited until
    full retirement age, the GAO said.

    Overall, the GAO found that experts recommended that retirees systematically
    draw down their savings and covert a portion of their savings into an income
    annuity to cover necessary expense or opt for the annuity provided by an
    employer-sponsored defined benefit pension instead of a lump-sum withdrawal.

    The GAO also found that given the difficult economy and life expectancy
    increases, experts recommend that most workers, if possible, continue to work
    and save well beyond age 62.

    And the GAO said that an immediate annuity can protect retirees from the risk
    of outliving one’s savings, but that only about 6% of those with a 401(k)-type
    plan purchased one at retirement.

    According to experts consulted by GAO for its report, retirees ought to do
    consider the following:

    * Many retirees should delay taking Social Security to increase payments for

    * Depending on net worth, households also should consider buying a life
    annuity, particularly if they don’t have a traditional pension that guarantees
    sufficient income.

    * High-net-wealth households generally don’t need life annuities.

    * Middle-income households, such as those with $191,000 in financial assets
    and without a traditional pension, should consider using a portion their savings
    to purchase an inflation-adjusted annuity.

    * Delaying Social Security is more cost effective than purchasing an annuity
    to enhance retirement income because the money that a retiree would forego by
    waiting until age 66 is less than the amount needed to purchase the contract.

    * Retirees should make withdrawals from their investment portfolio at a rate
    of no more than 3% to 6% annually at retirement, with adjustments for inflation,
    to help ensure they won’t run out of money.

    Sri Reddy, a senior vice president and head of institutional income at
    Prudential Retirement, commended the GAO for addressing what Americans can do to
    ensure income throughout retirement, saying that the recommendations are logical
    and rational. “It speaks volumes that this is a pending issue,” he said.

    But the GAO’s recommendations don’t necessarily take into account the human
    element, he said. According to Reddy, more time and energy must be spent
    educating workers about how much they need to save for retirement and how much
    longer they might have to work to achieve their retirement goals, before one can
    talk about whether an income annuity is the right product or not.

    “We need to help people arrive at a destination with some level of comfort,”
    Reddy said. “Before product, you need tools, education and support.”

    In essence, Reddy said people need a baseline understanding of what they need
    for retirement and some forms of protection in place while saving for
    retirement. And all the rest is moot if we haven’t provided the education need
    to help people get there. “We also need to focus on outcomes,” said Reddy. “Not
    account values, but how much we need in terms of retirement income.”

    He noted, for instance, that annuity with a guaranteed minimum withdrawal
    benefit can provide those saving for retirement with some degree of protection
    and an idea of how much income they will receive in retirement. That type of
    annuity protects savers against investment losses and guarantees the percent and
    total amount a person can withdraw from the annuity.

    -Robert Powell; 415-439-6400; AskNewswires@dowjones.com

      (END) Dow Jones Newswires
      Copyright (c) 2011 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

    Originally Posted at NASDAQ on July 11, 2011 by Robert Powell.

    Categories: Positive Media