We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (17,774)
  • Industry Conferences (3)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (207)
  • Negative Media (139)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (656)
  • Wink's Articles (265)
  • Wink's Inside Story (238)
  • Wink's Press Releases (99)
  • Blog Archives

  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Is the three-legged stool off-kilter?

    September 5, 2011 by Sheryl J. Moore

    BY Sheryl J. Moore

    Published 9/1/2011

    Be wary of annuity pricing that appears unequal. One of the parties to the deal may be benefiting at the expense of the other.

    Since entering the insurance business 13 years ago, I have attended many training sessions and scores of seminars. Often, speakers at these meetings will make reference to a “three-legged stool” as an analogy for  the pillars of financial services transactions. This allows the speaker to ccreate a more vivid image in the minds of their listeners while they instruct.

    Let’s use that same reliable three-legged stool example to explain fixed and indexed annuities.

    In this example, each of these parties represents one leg of our stool. When each of these parties is receiving comparable benefits, the three legs on the stool all are in equal height. Our stool stands firm when we sit on it. But if
    one of those legs ends up longer than the others, we are likely to face injury when relying on its inequitable structure.

    What would result in such a calamity? There are a few scenarios in annuity pricing that could result in an uneven distribution of benefits. Regardless, you must remember that when it comes to annuity pricing, there are  only so many pennies in a dollar (meaning that rich benefits can’t be offered out of thin air; other features must be scaled back in order to compensate for inflated features).

    So, if one of the legs on our stool is relatively longer, that means that one (or both) of the other legs is conversely shorter. (Remember, the insurance company’s leg on the stool will generally never be shorter. If  the insurance company cannot make their required spread, the annuity product will not be offered for sale.)

    CDs vs. annuities

    Let’s look at an example. Considering today’s miserably low interest rate environment, it is tougher than ever to garner interest in annuities. In fact, the average indexed annuity cap is a mere 4.04 percent (for  annual point-to-point strategies only). Indexed annuities’ value proposition doesn’t seem so attractive when the offer is “worst-case scenario, zero percent; best case scenario, 4.04 percent.” This may sound pretty good to the guy earning a mere 0.94 percent on his bank CDs; but for seniors, 4.04 percent is likely equivalent to the minimum guaranteed rate on the fixed annuities they bought before the turn of the century.

    However, did you know that there are indexed annuities with caps greater than 9 percent today? Yes, annual point-to-point caps (an apples-to-apples comparison with the aforementioned 4.04 percent cap). How can  that be, when our average cap is more than 5 percent less than this rate?

    Return to our three-legged stool: In this example, our annuity purchaser is receiving a relatively greater benefit. And since the insurance company’s leg won’t be cut short, in order to compensate for the purchaser’s  longer leg on the stool, whose leg will be cut short? The agent’s. The commission paid on such a product is significantly less than comparable products with caps that are “average.”

    Commissions

    Take another example: commissions. The average indexed annuity commission paid today is 6.65 percent. You might be surprised to hear that there are actually indexed annuities that pay commissions as high as 12 percent. When you consider such an annuity, where the agent’s leg of the stool is relatively longer, who is getting the “short end of the stick?” Remember what I said about the insurer’s spread; they always make their profit. I think you get the idea…

    Every day I speak with seasoned insurance professionals that have been doing business for 30-plus years and still don’t understand this basic concept of annuity pricing. There are many other examples where stool legs can be a little off-kilter: renewal rates, surrender charges and annuitization rates. Ultimately you need to ask yourself a simple question:

    “Does this product look too good to be true?”

    Let me plainly state my message: “If it looks too good to be true, it is.” Not probably, it is. This is an annuity, folks. Like a peach pie, there are only so many ways to slice it. So, the next time you see an ad for an annuity offering a 50 percent bonus ask yourself, “Is this three-legged stool sturdy or off-kilter?”

    Originally Posted at Senior Market Advisor on September 1, 2011 by Sheryl J. Moore.

    Categories: Sheryl's Articles
    currency