We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (22,088)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (492)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (827)
  • Wink's Articles (376)
  • Wink's Inside Story (284)
  • Wink's Press Releases (129)
  • Blog Archives

  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • How to Escape 'Annuicide'

    December 4, 2011 by Sheryl J. Moore

    By Sheryl Moore
    AnnuityNews

    I recently had the occasion to read an article entitled, “Insights into the Annuity Puzzle.” This article dedicated a whopping 1,254 words to exploring the question, “Why don’t more Americans turn their annuities into a guaranteed lifetime income stream?” Nobel laureates chimed-in on how framing, loss aversion and various other psychological methods have failed to convince the annuity purchaser to take action in securing their retirement income futures. But, ultimately, the scholars were unable to pinpoint the reason why more people don’t “create their own pension” using annuity products.

    Those who want a guaranteed retirement income stream can achieve it in one-of-two ways. Both purchasing an immediate (income) annuity and annuitizing a deferred annuity can provide a guaranteed income that the purchaser cannot outlive.

    That certainly sounds like a fabulous proposition to the millions of Americans who lost money in the market decline of 2008. These folks are now faced with the realization that, in order to retire comfortably, they will either have to begin saving more or working longer. In fact, 20 percent of American workers do not EVER plan to retire, a recent study by Sun Life Financial revealed. And the fact that Americans are living longer than ever before is compounding the problem. The 90-plus population has nearly tripled since 1980, according to U.S. census figures (a direct result of our nation’s cutting-edge medical advancements).

    I don’t know about you, but I think that sounds like A LOT of people that need the guaranteed lifetime income benefits of annuities!

    Surprisingly, however, neither immediate annuities nor annuitization are very popular. Immediate annuities are far from mainstream, accounting for just a fraction of total U.S. annuity sales. In addition, only 2 percent of annuity owners turn their contract into a guaranteed lifetime income stream via annuitization – but why?

    Back in 2004, a staggering statistic rocked my world and made me start contemplating the question as to why more Americans didn’t make the move to guarantee an income they cannot outlive. As of January 1st, 2011, more than 10,000 Baby Boomers were to reach the age of 65 every day and will keep turning 65 each day for the next 19 years. How would we help these people to secure their retirement futures and provide them a guaranteed lifetime income that they could not outlive?

    First, we had to investigate why people didn’t purchase immediate annuities or annuitize to begin with. My research pointed to three primary problems:

    • Annuity purchasers do not want to lose flexibility – The structured, inflexible payments of the traditional methods of guaranteeing lifetime income lead many to refer to it as “annuicide.” Once payments begin, they cannot be stopped, modified in amount or changed in any manner.
    • Annuity agents do not want to lose control of the assets – When a salesperson proposes their client purchase an immediate annuity or annuitize a deferred annuity, they lose the ability to move the monies into another vehicle should the clients’ needs change in the future. Because of the structured, inflexibility of the product, there is no opportunity for a “Plan B.”
    • Annuity agents do not want to compromise their commissions – Immediate annuities and annuitizing deferred annuities pays the agent a mere 3 percent commission. Contrast this with today’s average 6.60 percent commission paid on deferred indexed annuities and it is easy to see why it is hard to create a compelling “total package” in favor of the guaranteed lifetime income discussion.

    For these reasons, I dreamt up an alternative to annuitization: Guaranteed Lifetime Withdrawal Benefits (GLWBs) on fixed and indexed annuities. Unlike their variable annuity brethren, the fixed and indexed GLWBs would not be used as a method of providing a principal protection element on a risk money product. After all, fixed and indexed annuities inherently offer preservation of principal and interest earned. No, these GLWBs would be utilized as an alternative to annuitization. They’d provide a guaranteed income stream the purchaser could not outlive while allowing flexibility, control and the same commission the agent was paid on any other deferred annuity.

    How is it working? Phenomenally; as of 3Q, 2011, 54.1 percent of all indexed annuity sales have a GLWB attached to the contract. And, of those annuity purchasers electing a GLWB on their indexed annuities, an average of 11.9 percent are currently taking out guaranteed lifetime income under the rider provisions. When you consider that these benefits are a mere five years old and that annuitization has existed for thousands of years, achieving a nearly 12 percent utilization rate is astounding! Today, this lifetime income is ordinarily activated before year-two of the contract, indicating that the values of this benefit are greatly needed.

    It is important to realize that the guaranteed lifetime income of annuities is something that doesn’t change with the mountains and valleys associated with these contracts’ credited rates. Every day is a good day to sell guaranteed lifetime income – even if the credited rate is only a mere 2.3 percent!

    But if your client is looking to avoid the handcuffs of annuitization or doesn’t appreciate the structure of an immediate annuity, perhaps you should explore GLWBs on fixed or indexed annuities. This can provide a much more palatable method for proposing your clients an income that they cannot outlive.

    Sheryl J. Moore is President and CEO of AnnuitySpecs.com and LifeSpecs.com, indexed product resources in Des Moines, Iowa. She has over a decade of experience working with indexed products and provides competitive intelligence, market research, product development, consulting services and insight to select financial services companies. She may be reached at sheryl.moore@annuityspecs.com.

    ©Entire contents copyright 2011 by InsuranceNewsNet.com Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this article may be reprinted without the expressed written consent from InsuranceNewsNet.com.

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet on November 30, 2011 by Sheryl J. Moore.

    Categories: Sheryl's Articles
    currency