We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,225)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (420)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (803)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Selling Suitably in 2012

    December 28, 2011 by Nicholas C. Gerhart and Patrick C. Reeder

    December 21, 2011

    By Nicholas C. Gerhart and
    Patrick C. Reeder

    AnnuityNews

    InsuranceNewsNet Magazine, October 2011

    Annuities
    continue to play an important part in retirement income discussions, just as
    regulators have been strongly focused on the product and how these products are
    sold. For example, the NAIC adopted a revised Suitability in Annuity
    Transactions Model Regulation in March 2010. As a result of this new model, which
    has already been adopted in more than a dozen states, many carriers and
    producers have revised their annuity suitability procedures.

    As Scottish
    philosopher Thomas Reid observed, “The rules of navigation never navigated a
    ship.” It is also true for annuity suitability. Good rules are necessary;
    however, it is those that live them that bring them to life.

    For example,
    as a result of the enhanced suitability model, insurance producers often gather
    significant information about their clients’ financial situation, needs and
    risk tolerance in order to make suitable recommendations. One of the unintended
    consequences of these new rules is that in order to meet their suitability
    obligations, insurance producers may have to learn about clients’ securities
    holdings. This has led to questions about what an insurance producer, who is
    not also securities licensed, can ask or recommend in advising clients on
    suitable sources of funds for insurance policies. In June, the Iowa Insurance
    Division continued its leadership in the annuity regulatory arena and released
    two bulletins which give guidance as to what is permitted, and prohibited, by
    insurance producers and those holding securities licenses.

    The Iowa
    bulletins apply to producers selling annuities and life insurance. In addition,
    they draw a distinction between an “insurance-only person” (one who has a valid
    insurance license, but not one for securities) and a “securities-only person”
    (one who has a valid securities license, but not one for insurance).

    In order to
    comply with Iowa’s requirement that an insurance producer must have reasonable
    grounds for believing that the recommendation to purchase, borrow against,
    exchange or replace an annuity or life insurance is suitable for the consumer,
    an insurance-only person is permitted to discuss the consumer’s risk tolerance,
    financial situation and needs.

    An
    insurance-only person may discuss:

    • Financial experience.

    • Financial objectives, including need for
    guarantees and minimum lifetime income stream.

    • Risk tolerance.

    • Need to balance and diversify risk.

    • Tax status, including the use of tax
    deferred vehicles.

    • Existing assets, including investments and
    insurance holdings.

    • Sources to fund the annuity or life
    insurance.

    • Liquidity needs and liquid net worth.

    • Financial time horizon.

    • Intended use of the annuity or life
    insurance.

    An
    insurance-only person may NOT:

    • Discuss risks specific to a consumer’s
    securities portfolio.

    • Provide advice on or compare a consumer’s
    specific investment performance with other financial products.

    • Recommend or identify specific securities
    that could be liquidated to fund an insurance product.

    • Recommend specific allocations between
    insurance and securities products.

    • Offer research, analysis or recommendations
    to a consumer regarding specific securities.

    • Complete securities forms, except for forms
    generally relating to or forms required as part of an insurance transaction.

    • Hold him or herself as an investment
    advisor, securities agent or investment advisor representative.

    An
    insurance-only person can talk about the stock market “in general terms”
    including “market risks and recent or historic economic activities that are
    generally known to the public and regularly discussed in public media” and have
    “general discussions about balancing risk, diversification, etc., that support
    an insurance position within a consumer’s financial plan.”

    They are
    permitted to give advice as part of a financial plan; however, he or she must
    identify him or herself as an individual who holds a producer license and that
    he or she “is authorized to sell annuity or life insurance products and not
    sell, recommend or provide advice about securities.”

    As millions
    of baby boomers are preparing to retire, the insurance industry continues to
    promote the importance of annuity products as part of an overall retirement
    plan. The guarantees within fixed annuities, combined with the ability to
    convert one’s accumulation value to a lifetime income, will likely contribute
    to continued sales growth in the fixed annuity space. With this increasing
    demand for a product that may be entering its “golden age,” sales practices of
    annuities will remain under the regulatory microscope. State departments of
    insurance will continue to regulate fixed annuity products and enacting the
    enhanced model suitability in annuity transactions is a top priority in many
    state departments of insurance.

    We expect
    more new issues to arise. Insurance-only producers need to use care when
    determining the appropriateness of an annuity transaction for a customer and
    balance between doing a proper suitability analysis and offering investment
    advice without a license. Thanks to Iowa’s leadership, we have a solid outline
    on sales activities that insurance-only producers may complete in determining
    whether an annuity is suitable for a customer. We can also expect states like
    Iowa to bring their solutions to the NAIC for broader adoption by other states.

    Producer
    Requirements

    The 2010 NAIC
    Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation offers three core
    requirements:

    1) A
    producer who recommends the purchase or exchange of an annuity must obtain
    “suitability information” from the consumer, which includes:

    • Annual income.

    • Existing assets, including investment

    and life insurance holdings.

    • Financial situation needs, including the
    financial resources used for the funding of the annuity.

    • Age.

    • Financial experience.

    • Financial objectives.

    • Financial time horizon.

    • Intended use of the annuity.

    • Liquidity needs.

    • Liquid net worth.

    • Risk tolerance.

    • Tax status.

    2) A
    producer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the producer’s
    recommendation is suitable based on facts disclosed by the consumer, including
    the consumer’s suitability information.

    3)
    The producer must have a reason able basis to believe the following:

    a. The consumer has been reasonably informed
    of various features of the annuity.

    b. The consumer would benefit from certain
    features of the annuity, such as tax-deferred growth, annuitization or death or
    living benefit.

    c. The particular annuity as a whole, the
    underlying sub-accounts to which funds are allocated at the time of purchase or
    exchange of the annuity, and riders and similar product enhancements, if any,
    are suitable.

    d. In the case of an exchange or replacement
    of an annuity, the exchange or replacement is suitable.

    Nicholas
    C. Gerhart is vice president of compliance/regulatory affairs for Sammons
    Financial Group/Midland National Life/North American Company Life and Health,
    where he handles corporate compliance and market conduct issues and manages
    regulatory affairs. He can be reached at Nicholas.Gerhart@innfeedback.com.

    Patrick
    C. Reeder is Of Counsel in Stradley Ronon’s Insurance Practice Group. Based in
    the Washington office, Mr. Reeder advises a broad range of clients in
    regulatory compliance, government affairs and strategic business transactions
    with a focus in highly-regulated industries. He can be reached at Patrick.Reeder@innfeedback.com.

    © Entire contents copyright 2011 by InsuranceNewsNet.com, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of
    this article may be reprinted without the expressed written consent from
    InsuranceNewsNet.com.

    Originally Posted at AnnuityNews on December 21, 2011 by Nicholas C. Gerhart and Patrick C. Reeder.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency