We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,225)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (420)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (803)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Fixed Annuities Poised for Growth in 2012, but Challenges Remain

    January 26, 2012 by Kim O'Brien

    Even after the defeat of 151A, proposed regulations could impact fixed annuities.

    By Kim O’Brien

    January 19, 2012

    The National Association of Insurance Commissions (NAIC) released updated data on Dec. 26, 2011 (see chart below), which shows that fixed annuity complaints to be very low and decreased even further in 2011.

     

    This is good news for sellers of fixed annuities. Some felt that issues and concerns were put to rest with the defeat of SEC Rule 151A, but we must remain vigilant with regulators and legislators, particularly with the broad and often vague requirements of Dodd-Frank. The National Association for Fixed Annuities (NAFA) has been and will continue to be a strong advocate for fixed annuities, both in Washington, D.C. and on the state level. Here is a brief update on current federal activities that could impact fixed annuities.

    Source of Funds

    The SEC and FINRA continue to make public statements about regulating the movement of money that involves a security. At a recent meeting NAFA attended an SEC staff person said that “if a security is involved on either side of the sale, we will be looking at it.” While there is no existing federal authority permitting this oversight, we must watch carefully and act when necessary to ensure oversight of the sale of fixed annuities remains the job of the state insurance departments.

    DOL Fiduciary Standard

    The Department of Labor continues to publicly state that they will re-propose a rule in the first half of 2012 that would change the definition of “fiduciary” under ERISA. We expect this new rule to still be overly broad and cover IRAs. Such a rule would have significant negative consequences for the fixed annuity marketplace. NAFA will watch closely and work to obtain a strong seller’s exception when the sale does not also provide investment advice.

    SEC Fiduciary Standard/Section 913 Study

    Section 913 of the Dodd-Frank Act required the SEC to review standards of care for providing personal investment advice to retail consumers, and should it see fit the SEC via rulemaking could address regulatory gaps. Currently there is no proposed rule, but a staff report released last January and recent SEC congressional testimony recommends a uniform fiduciary standard for broker-dealers and investment advisers. Many studies suggest that this would increase the costs to market and sell fixed annuities and the fiduciary standard, while appropriate for managing security portfolios, is not appropriate for the sale of a fixed annuity. Furthermore, NAFA believes the suitability standard in place in almost half of the states and rapidly being adopted in the remaining half, is a stronger standard for consumer protection and the suitable sales of fixed annuities. 

    Federal Insurance Office (FIO)

    The new FIO is required to prepare a comprehensive study on insurance regulation that is supposed to be released at the end of this month or in February. In December, NAFA attended an exclusive FIO event in Washington, D.C. at the Treasury Department where participants discussed the current state of insurance regulation, including international issues. We eagerly await the release of this study and the recommendations suggested so we can ensure there is no negative impact for fixed annuities. While the FIO does not have rule-writing authority, and it has been clear that the states regulate insurance, there is concern the Treasury could expand their authority or Congress could act upon FIO comments.

     

    Tax Deferral

    Congress and America is now more focused on tax policy reform than in previous years. There will be several big tax fights this year and NAFA will actively monitor for any legislation that would change the tax treatment of fixed annuities.

    Additionally, NAFA is focused and watching state developments. State regulators and staff are continuing to look at ways to protect consumers yet they are often uninformed or misinformed about fixed annuity marketing practices and existing regulations that protect consumers. Next month NAFA will report on state and NAIC issues the association is watching. 

    Kim O’Brien, CFP, MBA, is president and CEO of the National Association for Fixed Annuities.

    Originally Posted at LifeHealthPro on January 19, 2012 by Kim O'Brien.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency