We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,244)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (422)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (804)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Mass. Proposes Background Checks For Advisors

    March 26, 2013 by Kenneth Corbin

    Massachusetts-based financial advisors could soon have to submit to a criminal background check under a proposed reform to the registration process in that state.

    Securities regulators in theBay State are asking for comments from the public on an amendment to the application process that would require investment advisor representatives (IARs) to submit a Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI) Acknowledgement Form with their registration application, authorizing the state to verify the criminal disclosures that applicants are to include with the U-4 forms filed with the Massachusetts Securities Division.

    “The Division believes that it is in the public interest and for the protection of investors to conduct criminal background checks of those individuals seeking IAR registration in order to ensure that the applicant is not subject to a statutory disqualification and has truthfully and accurately disclosed any criminal background required on Form U-4,”Massachusetts regulators said in their request for comment.

    The proposedMassachusetts rules come as states are taking on a larger role in overseeing financial advisors. As a general matter, advisors with less than$100 million in assets under management must now register with state securities regulators, rather than theU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Previously, the threshold for federal registration had been set at$25 million.

    The Massachusetts CORI Acknowledgement Form, which advisor applicants would have to have notarized, would give state securities regulators with a tool to catch any omissions on the U-4 forms that advisors are required to file. Those applications ask advisors to list all felony convictions and certain misdemeanors, irrespective of when the case was resolved.Massachusetts regulators reserve the right to deny an application if the securities secretary “finds that the order is in the public interest and that the applicant has been convicted within the past 10 years of any misdemeanor involving a security or any aspect of the securities business, or any felony.”

    The Massachusetts Securities Division recently won access to the state’s iCORI electronic-database system, giving it the authorization to conduct the proposed background checks.

    In its request for comment, the Securities Division is seeking information from advisors about the potential costs and other logistical implications, including privacy concerns, of adding the CORI form to the application process.

    The regulations that Massachusetts is proposing would also entail minor modifications to filing process for Form ADV, the document that advisors submit for registration with the SEC and relevant state authorities. Noting that “the Form ADV has changed significantly over time,” the proposed amendment to the filing process would strip out specific references to enumerated items on the form that have been modified, referring instead generally to the form’s instructions in an effort to “more closely align state requirements with national standards.”

    In a research note, the consulting firm Cipperman Compliance Services offered a blunt assessment of the prospects for the proposedMassachusetts regulations to spill over into other states.

    “We expect thatMassachusetts will require these criminal background checks, and many other states will follow with similar requirements,” the firm said.

    The Massachusetts Securities Division is accepting written comments on the proposal for advisor background checks through May 15. That same day, the division has scheduled a public hearing where interested parties are invited to make oral presentations on the proposed changes.

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet on March 25, 2013 by Kenneth Corbin.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency