We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • The Valuation of Retirement Income

    March 12, 2013 by Gary Baker

    For many, the idea of retirement is a daunting concept, partly because it means the idea of becoming older has to be accepted. This is even true for those who began planning in their twenties – aging isn’t always a desired idea. As agents, we need to learn how to educate our clients, sharing with them that retirement isn’t frightening, especially if it’s done in a way that makes sense to the everyday consumer.

    This is true for those sharing retirement income strategies, because incorporating the use of income annuities as a holding within a client’s portfolio are becoming increasingly common. The reason is they tend to support long-term cash flow needs better than strategies that don’t use income annuities. While these strategies improve results for the client, they aren’t as widely adopted for several reasons, including:

    1. Executing and managing a product allocation plan in retirement isn’t as easy for investors as managing asset allocation during the time of accumulation;

    2. There are behavioral challenges related to the investor’s perceived sense of loss when they are giving up control of their assets;

    3. Income annuity sales don’t align well with the business models of most distribution firms.

    The good news is that the industry is addressing all of these issues and then sharing the information with the public. We are learning:

    1 There are more tools and guidelines available to support retirement income strategies;

    2. Income annuity products are evolving – over 80% of income annuities sold today have some form of liquidity or refund feature that allows either the investor or their estate to get money back;

    3. Advisor disincentives to sell income annuities are being addressed.

    This article will focus on some of the advisor disincentives and how they are being addressed.

    Once a purchase of an immediate income annuity is made, those assets disappear from a client’s consolidated statement and, most significantly, they disappear from the AUM report of the advisory firm – the primary scorecard for performance from upper management down to the advisor. This is now becoming critical issues for some distributors, especially registered firms like Broker Dealers and Wirehouses, because they don’t want to be in a position where an advisor (or their sales manager) feels penalized if they sell an income annuity in a situation where it may be a viable option for the client.

    This untenable position has resulted in an increase in demand from some of the large distributors for insurance carriers to provide a valuation for in-force contracts that have been annuitized – many of which are income annuities. Of course, the primary reason for this request is to include these holdings in internal AUM reports and other management reports. As the volume of these requests increased, an interesting dilemma came to light. There was no standard methodology to calculate a market valuation of an income annuity contract. Traditionally, insurance companies have calculated up to five different types of valuations, depending upon the need. These include Statutory Reserves, Commutation Values (a form of liquidity), an IRS Fair Market Value for certain qualified contracts, Compensation Based Values for products that paid a trail commission, as well as Initial Premium amounts. A couple of carriers even calculated some form of market value. Unfortunately, all of these calculations were proprietary to each carrier (i.e., a black box) or weren’t updated frequently. Given the nature of reports like AUM, there was a desire by distributors to have something that was more transparent and tied to the market as interest rates fluctuated.

    About two years ago, with the help and sponsorship of the Retirement Income Industry Association (RIIA), a number of organizations across the financial service industry got together to begin a journey to define and implement a common methodology for the market valuation of an annuitized asset. Over time, a working committee of over 100 individuals from 40 firms representing carriers, distributors and service providers were involved in defining a valuation standard. They also worked on the processes necessary to update and transmit these values, to happen as frequent as possible, on a daily basis if necessary. This new standard, called Income Value is essentially defined as the actuarial present value of the remaining benefits of an income contract. A part of the calculation uses a discount rate called the Income Annuity Yield Curve, which represents the average crediting rate derived from the top payouts on any given day – a process similar to other benchmarks like the Lipper Average. Standard Mortality projections are also used. As a general practice, the group agreed that Income Value would be updated on a monthly basis, which is the same frequency that other insurance and annuity contracts are valued.

    This fall, the first wave of carriers have begun calculating Income Value and are now able to transmit the data through the DTCC, to the distributors who are requesting it. These firms are now starting to investigate additional ways for Income Value to be deployed within their practice. Many of these options touch the client via consolidated statements, tax reporting, income planning processes, as well as a base for which fee-based advisors can charge for their services.

    This expansion has led to some new insights, relative to additional inconsistencies across the industry. One interesting issue being identified is the potential for a client to see inconsistent valuations for annuitized contracts from two sources. One is a proprietary value provided directly by the carrier on an annual Tax Form 5498 for certain qualified contracts, based on the IRS defined Gift Tax methodology. The other may now be a standard Income Value, which is provided by the distributor (or custodian) on a daily or monthly basis via a client statement.

    Needless to say, the inconsistencies across the industry will become more visible as valuations are transmitted to more distributors. So, the RIIA working committee recently surveyed a group of carriers and large distributors to get a better understanding of the different preferences and practices related to contract valuations. The results were quite interesting.

    Valuation Practices of Carriers:

    • On average, each carrier calculates about three different values for a contract
    • Many (not all) provide a Form 5498 for qualified contracts. For those that do, only some use the IRS guidelines for valuation. Others use statutory reserves and some would like to investigate the use of Income Value
    • Half didn’t see an issue with Income Value potentially being applied differently by each distributor – half did. However, the use of appropriate disclosures was important to all.

    Valuation Practices of Distributors:

    • Some distributors receive multiple values from carriers
    • Although, most are unaware if the carrier sends a Form 5498, they will request the IRS value so that they can do RMD reporting for certain custodial accounts that hold contracts. A few will use the IRS value for planning.
    • Half would use Income Value for client statements – half won’t (they don’t want to give an appearance of a cashable amount).
    • Half would also use Income Value for Income Planning.

    The good news is that firms are starting to grapple with these issues, as the use of income valuations becomes more widespread. Solving for a standard market valuation won’t be the only factor in increasing the adoption of income annuity products. However, it will be an important catalyst that helps make these products more mainstream for financial planning practice that support the lifetime retirement income needs of their clients.

    Readers that are interested in more detailed and technical information about the new standard to calculate Income Value can find it on CANNEX’s website – see: http://www.cannex.com/usa/english/products_iycu.htm.

    Article written by Gary Baker, President, CANNEX USA.

     

    Originally Posted at Annuity Outlook Magazine on March 2013 by Gary Baker.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency