We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • What’s In A Word? For Annuities, Buyers

    March 11, 2013 by Linda Koco

    “Do annuities earn money, interest or a return?” That was among the many questions that regulators and annuity industry participants took up this week during a phone conference on a consumer document about deferred annuities.

    The ensuing discussion may be of interest to annuity advisors, because the questions raised in the session touch on issues that advisors sometimes encounter when defining and explaining deferred annuities to consumers. Consider:

    “If an annuity is described as a product that is earning money, how does that differ from receiving an income?” asked one session participant in response to the question about whether annuities earn money, interest or a return.

    If you say that annuities produce earnings, that suggests the value will be positive, but that is not always the case, said another.

    Well, said another participant, “value” is a term that consumers will get. Yes, agreed another, that’s a term that can go either way, positive or negative.

    “Value” is good, said a third person, as long as we remove the term “earn,” which suggests only positive changes.

    A consensus formed around the idea of speaking about deferred annuities in terms of policy values, not earnings.

    It’s not easy

    Exchanges like this should be of interest to annuity advisors, who encounter similar challenges when going over key points about deferred annuities with their customers. What is the correct definition, and what will the client understand? Most would agree, this is not as easy as describing a pencil to a grade-schooler.

    The discussion, and many more like it, occurred during a “word-smithing” session on a proposed new Buyer’s Guide for Deferred Annuities from National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). The terminology and concepts decided upon in sessions like this, subject to consumer input, will go into that guide.

    The guide only discusses deferred annuities, pointed out Jim Mumford, who heads the NAIC Annuity Disclosure (A) Working Group that hosted the session and who is Iowa’s First Deputy Commissioner. It will update the NAIC previous buyer’s guide which was published before NAIC had adopted its suitability and disclosure models, Mumford said.

    The session ran for more than two hours. The bulk of it focused on eyeballing words, sentences and passages in the proposed guide in light of whether they are accurate, too specific, clear enough and/or helpful to consumers.

    Following are a few more examples of the word-smithing exchanges. (Since many people participated in the discussion and since not all identified themselves when speaking, the various speakers are not identified here.)

    Illustration

    What is an illustration? One participant said the document’s current definition of “illustration” is not good. (It appears in a callout box along with definitions of “contract” and “disclosure.”)

    The definition in question says that an illustration is “a document that estimates the money your annuity might earn. Ask what’s guaranteed and what isn’t and what assumptions were made to create the illustrations.”

    Instead, the commenter suggested saying it’s a document that shows how the product works, not what the value is.

    How about inserting the term “personalized” into the definition, as in “a personalized illustration?” someone else suggested.

    One person suggested a definition that conforms more to the one used in the NAIC disclosure model regulation.

    But the disclosure model definition is more technical, responded another, pointing out that what’s needed is something more consumer friendly—such as, it “shows how your annuity might work, based on the assumptions.”

    Maybe it should say that an illustration “shows how your annuity features might work” and then continue with the next sentence in the working draft (Ask what’s guaranteed and…), said the next commenter.

    “That makes it clear…it’s a little more descriptive,” was the response.

    Beneficiary or survivor

    Another discussion explored whether the guide should use the term “beneficiary” or “survivor.” The consumer representatives who are part of the working group prefer the term “survivor,” said one commenter. That’s because they think the word “beneficiary” sounds legalistic and contractual.

    “I agree, ‘beneficiary’ is more a term of art than ‘survivor’,” said another.

    But there may be an argument for using “beneficiaries,” said a third, alluding to some deeper meanings.  In response, one word-smither suggested putting the term “survivors” at the end of the document, which has a list of questions that consumers might ask. Why not say, “How do I ensure that my survivors get money from my annuity?”

    Why not say “designated survivor” instead of just “survivor”? asked another.

    Okay, let’s work on a question for that, was the next comment.

    How about saying, upon the first reference, “the survivor you have designated (beneficiary) and then using the term ‘survivor’ after that?” responded the word-smither.

    The collective thought seemed to center around that last idea.

    Other topics

    On it went throughout the session. Commenters took up a wide range of other topics, peeling back statements to see what consumers might see or think.

    Some of the other topics included: whether consumers would understand reference to financial markets, whether to make reference to specific indexes, how to define monthly or daily averaging (in fixed indexed annuities), pointing out that subaccount values in variable annuities can go up and down, how best to describe a market value adjustment, and what to say and not say about partial withdrawals.

    At various points, Mumford would reiterate that the group needs to answer the question, “What is important to the consumer?”

    For example, in a discussion about whether to remove the word “risk” in a paragraph about variable annuities, he said the goal is to point out the differences between variable annuities and deferred fixed annuities, “so if you remove reference to risk, you remove the point we need to make.”

    Mumford did offer a suggestion on how this might be done. But for purposes here, it’s worth taking a high level look at that moment—from the perspective of advisors who go face-to-face with consumers on a daily basis. Discussing risk, safety, product features and more is what annuity advisors do when educating, selling and providing ongoing service to consumers.

    They, like the working group experts, are always considering what to say and not say about annuities, how much to say and how to say it. They want to be clear. They want to be accurate. The few examples shown here indicates that it does take thought and effort.

    When the final document is approved for use, advisors should at least have some reassurance that the wording in the resulting guide has been combed through by a number of the country’s leading annuity regulators and industry experts. It will not be highly technical, like a prospectus. But it will provide a balanced overview that might help facilitate discussion. It might even provide advisors with suggested language to use, if they get stuck on one point or another.

    Also worth noting is that consumer representatives have been providing input all along the developmental process, Mumford said. During the session, the group often referred certain points back to those representatives for further review and input. This too may be a source of reassurance.

    The session participants included regulators from several states plus representatives of several major industry trade groups, including NAFA, Insured Retirement Institute, American Council of Life Insurers, American Academy of Actuaries, and National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors. Also speaking were representatives of a few insurance companies.  The working group will have yet another session on March 22.

    Once the proposed guide is in final draft form, the working group will send it on to NAIC’s Life Insurance and Annuities (A) Committee for consideration.

    Linda Koco, MBA, is a contributing editor to AnnuityNews, specializing in life insurance, annuities and income planning. Linda can be reached at linda.koco@innfeedback.com.

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet on March 6, 2013 by Linda Koco.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency