We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Taking The Sting Out Of Annuity Taxes

    June 19, 2013 by Alan Lavine

    Your client is sitting on a pile of money in a deferred annuity, and now wants to limit the income tax damage upon withdrawal. What are the options?

    Based on IRS rules, an annuity policyholder owes taxes on the earnings upon withdrawal, at personal income rates (not the more generous dividend of capital gains rates) but not on the principal. Generally, the taxable earnings must be distributed first.

    This means that a policyholder, who invested $100,000 in a variable tax-deferred annuity and saw it grow to $150,000, would owe income taxes on the first $50,000 withdrawn.

    There is a way around the tax mess, suggests Graydon Coghlan, president of CFG Wealth Management, La Jolla, Calif.

    You can use what theIRS calls 1035 tax-free exchange, largely aimed at letting policyholders move money from one deferred annuity to another tax-free. Or a partial exchange can be made from a deferred to an immediate annuity, according to theInsured Retirement Institute, Washington, D.C.

    Tax experts cite recent IRS regulatory guidance (IRS Revenue Procedure 2011-38, covering partial exchanges) as the basis for suggesting this two-step process could lessen the tax blow.

    According to the newsletter Tax and Business Alert, published by Thomson Reuters, the strategy works like this: First, the client makes a partial withdrawal from the original annuity by completing a partial 1035 exchange into another annuity with another provider. Next, he or she surrenders either annuity contract at least 180 days later.

    Be advised, however, that the new annuity from the 1035 exchange likely will have back-end surrender charges. So the older annuity probably is best surrendered first.

    Here’s an example: Say a policyholder’s $50,000 initial investment in a variable annuity has grown to $200,000. If the policyholder withdrew $100,000, he or she would owe income taxes on $100,000 since annuity gains are taxed first.

    However, with the 1035 exchange, the client instead could put half of that $200,000 into a new annuity with another provider via the 1035 tax-free exchange. As a result, the policyholder’s original $50,000 principal or tax basis is split proportionately, $25,000 in each.

    Now, say the policyholder surrenders the annuity with no back-end surrender charge more than 180 days after the 1035 tax free exchange: This gives the policyholder a distribution of$100,000. But of that, only $75,000 rather than $100,000 is taxable as ordinary income. Reason: Thanks to the tax basis split between two annuities, another $25,000 is considered the tax-free return of the principal or tax basis.

    A few words to the wise: Be sure your client is older than 59 ½. Otherwise the policyholder pays an early withdrawal penalty of 10% in addition to the ordinary income taxes on distributions. Also a policyholder can’t do the partial 1035 exchange with the same insurance company. Otherwise, the IRS considers it one contract and the client pays taxes on the full amount withdrawn.

    This strategy works for those that have a large sum in an annuity,” says Coghlan.

    Other options to curb annuity taxes:

    • Many fixed-interest deferred annuities let policyholders withdraw 10% of their principal each year tax-free.
    • You could roll a client’s entire maturing annuity into a new one via a 1035 tax-free exchange to postpone the tax bill.
    • There is a spousal rule that may allow the surviving spouse of a deceased policyholder to continue the annuity contract as the new owner. If no money is withdrawn, there is no tax penalty. This rule, however, is limited to spouses, not to other relatives or business partners.
    • A deferred variable annuity policyholder could take regular withdrawals from the mutual funds for monthly income. This can stretch out the tax bill over the years.
    • Those nearing retirement could annuitize the contract and get insurance company guaranteed lifetime monthly income. They would pay taxes based on the IRS exclusion ratio, which results in about 50% to 60% of the income taxed as earnings. The rest is considered return of principal. But be advised at today’s low interest rates, a 65 year-old would get about $550 in lifetime monthly income on a $100,000 investment. A few years ago, when rates were higher, the policyholder could have received $650 monthly for life.

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet on June 18, 2013 by Alan Lavine.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency