We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,131)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (413)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (799)
  • Wink's Articles (352)
  • Wink's Inside Story (273)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Commissioners Back Leonardi Corporate Governance Idea, While Opponents Cite Flawed Process

    December 18, 2013 by Thomas Harman

    WASHINGTON – Commissioners watching the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ executive committee’s controversial vote rejecting having a consultant examine the NAIC’s corporate governance practices said they may still support the idea, while one who voted against it said he agreed with the motion in principle but differed on the process.

    The panel’s vote rejecting the idea followed a letter from the motion’s sponsor, Connecticut Commissioner Thomas Leonardi, to individual commissioners that indicated NAIC was rife with corporate governance problems, cronyism among them (Best’s News Service, Dec. 16, 2013). The Executive Committee then voted to allow review by an ad hoc corporate governance committee, which has been at work examining corporate governance. Ad hoc Panel Chairman John Huff of Missouri said corporate governance work would continue in that group. “The group has begun an outside review of the NAIC bylaws and other corporate governance issues and will incorporate the proposal to seek an outside consultant as that work continues,” Huff said.

    North Carolina Insurance Commissioner Wayne Goodwin told Best’s News Service he favored Leonardi’s position and would have voted for it had he been a panel member. “I’m with Leonardi,” he said. “There needs to be a critical evaluation of what we do as an association, and how we do our jobs as an association,” he said. Goodwin said it is not helpful for any association to have such battles in public when they can be addressed privately.

    Goodwin said the closure of debate before several interested parties had finished speaking — himself included — was upsetting. “I would like to have voted [for the measure],” he said. “I anticipate that this issue is not done, given the players and the topic involved.”

    Goodwin said he is trying to take positives from the exchange, and said it was good that NAIC is “having such a vigorous debate about what to do and what we have to do,” he said. “It shows we’re having growing pains as an association.”

    Washington Commissioner Mike Kreidler was another commissioner who was present for the discussion although he was not a member. “If I had been, I would have voted for it,” he said of Leonardi’s motion. Kreidler offered no comment on the wording of Leonardi’s letter, but said Leonardi was proposing ways in which the NAIC could be more effective.

    One opponent of Leonardi’s motion, Stephen Robertson of Indiana, said he voted against the motion but not because he is opposed to the notion of outside corporate governance. “I believe in process,” he said. Leonardi’s proposal, he said, lacked definition as to what the outside group was going to do. “I’m not opposed to Commissioner Leonardi,” Robertson said. “It was more of a process issue.”

    South Dakota Insurance Director Merle Scheiber’s reaction was in line with Robertson’s. Scheiber, while not a panel member, was present for the meeting. He did not agree with what happened in terms of comment being cut off during debate, but agreed with the ultimate result.

    Scheiber told Best’s News Service he differed with the idea that NAIC should move to immediately obtain an outside consultant. “We have a process that we’re working through to address all of the challenges we have lately,” he said. Those who seek an outside consultant, he said, should make use of NAIC’s process.

    Scheiber said the tipping point for the matter should be in February, which is when the ad hoc corporate governance committee should report to a meeting of commissioners in Arizona. However, if the committee does not perform its work by then, NAIC should move toward Leonardi’s proposal and find an outside consultant, he said.

    The 12-5 vote at the NAIC Fall National Meeting in Washington came just five days after Leonardi sent a private letter to all 56 U.S. insurance commissioners and supervisors that was highly critical of NAIC’s governance failings. Leonardi brought a motion to the committee seeking to authorize a committee to hire a consultant who would examine NAIC corporate governance (Best’s News Service, Dec. 16, 2013).

    In his letter, he asked that an outside consultant be allowed to investigate NAIC’s governance structure and pursue initiatives that included a clarification of the role and authorities of officers, the executive commissioner and broader membership in making key decisions impacting state regulation, with particular attention given to how NAIC appoints representatives to external forums such as the International Association of Insurance Supervisors. Also, consultants should review the best practices of NAIC elections, and to clarify the role of chief executive officer to determine whether best practices are being followed.

    After the panel’s vote on Dec. 16, Leonardi expressed surprise that not everyone who wanted to speak got a chance to do so. He said it was “an unfortunate public display that showed poor support for transparency.” He said he was asking to find a consultant by having the same type of process that involved the hiring of Sen. Ben Nelson as chief executive officer. “What are we afraid of?” he asked, wondering out loud whether NAIC was so insecure that it was afraid of having a consultant look (Best’s News Service, Dec. 16, 2013).

    (By Thomas Harman, associate editor, BestWeek: Tom.Harman@ambest.com)

    Originally Posted at A.M. Best on December 17, 2013 by Thomas Harman.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency