We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,129)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (413)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (799)
  • Wink's Articles (352)
  • Wink's Inside Story (273)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • GAO Eyes Income Options — Including Annuities

    December 23, 2013 by Linda Koco

    One of the challenges that agents and advisors face when presenting income annuities to clients is how to help customers understand what factors impact retirement income outcomes.

    That is especially difficult for annuity producers who have previously focused on helping people accumulate assets through annuities or other products.  How do they flip over to the income discussion? What to point out? How to make the issues clear to the customer? Would certain customers do better with a systematic withdrawal plan than an income annuity?

    An increasing number of annuity carriers do provide educational information and online tools to help sort all this out.

    The problem is, not all producers have access to those materials. In addition, some producers hesitate to rely on provider-supplied materials out of concern that the materials may promote only the carrier’s products or solutions. Others do use provider materials, but they also want to use materials from independent resources — to ensure a balanced perspective.

    Some help from the GAO

    A new report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) might be of some help to agents and advisors who are wrestling with those issues.

    The report includes a discussion — and an interactive graphic — that highlights the options consumers have when setting up an income plan.  It also summarizes some of the factors that people need to consider.

    The discussion is part of GAO’s recent analysis of how various countries are handling “spend-down” options  in defined contribution retirement plans, such as 401(k)s.  The options covered in the report are lump sum (the most common form of payout from defined contribution retirement plans in the U.S., according to GAO), programed withdrawals (essentially, systematic withdrawals that start at a set percentage which can be changed later), and annuities.

    The report defines annuities as “guaranteed payments that are normally secured through a contract with an insurance company for either a set period or for the participant’s lifetime.” (In industry lingo, advisors tend to refer to such products as income annuities or deferred annuities that have been annuitized.)

    Although the report focuses on income options for people in retirement plans, the comments about annuities have applicability to retail income annuities as well.

    For instance, the researchers point out that the amount of annuity payout a person receives can hinge on a number of factors, not just on the retirement nest egg a person has accumulated (minus fees) in a plan.  

    Other factors include the age when payouts begin, they write, noting that older people generally receive higher payments than younger people. In addition, gender is a factor because men in the U.S. typically receive higher payments than same-aged women because men tend to have shorter lifespans than women. Another factor is health, because certain health issues may qualify a person for higher payouts.

    The impact of interest and other factors

    But where the report really rings bells for advisors in the retail market is in the researchers’ discussion about the impact of interest rates, inflation and investment returns on the retirement income.

    People face trade-offs when they choose an annuity, lump sum or programmed withdrawal spend-down option from a retirement plan, the researchers write. That’s because “no single option protects against all the various risks participants may encounter in retirement, such as longevity and inflation risk.”

    So, as retirement approaches, people must weigh the strengths and shortcomings of each option against their own unique retirement needs, the GAO researchers contend. People “also need to consider their other sources of retirement income, including government benefits and personal savings.”

    Advisors in the income planning market have probably thought and said many of the same things, perhaps a thousand times or more. But for those just moving into retirement income planning, the comments may serve as useful tips or reminders.

    Income calculator

    As noted above, GAO provides a free interactive graphic along with the report. It shows a simplified illustration of the points raised above, in both graphical and data format. Website visitors can use the model online and/or download it.

    The web visitor can see the impact of age, investment rates, investment returns, and inflation on retirement income by clicking different tabs. The graphic also allows viewing of the underlying data in spreadsheet form. 

    From that page, visitors can also download a “retirement model,” which is like a calculator. This lets people enter their own choices for the retirement factors mentioned above — gender, age, account balance at retirement, and the spend-down options they are considering. They can also enter choices for level payment annuity, programed withdrawal percentage, and a monthly payment desired (such as $2,000 a month), and they can enter certain assumptions, such as interest rate at retirement, inflation rate and investment return.  

    The model then computes the inflation-adjusted retirement income the entered numbers would produce. This appears in chart form.  A person can change the variables originally entered and see how the changes would impact the projected income in the chart.

    The model can be useful for illustration purposes, but GAO cautions that it does not represent specific quotes or rates from financial institutions, and that “conclusions drawn from the use of this tool should not be taken as an endorsement or financial advice about spend-down options.”

    As for the annuity payouts, GAO says these reflect prices similar to those in the U.S. retail markets in July 2013, and that pricing for in-plan annuity options may vary.

    The chart below provides a simplified example of what a chart from the retirement model might look like. This chart is taken from the GAO report. (The actual charts produced by the calculator vary by options selected, etc.)

     

    GAO notes that the model does not take into account a person’s access to other sources of retirement income (such as Social Security and personal savings), and does not incorporate the tax considerations of the choices.

    Income planning experts will find the output from the chart to be ill-suited for actual planning purposes. That is due to its simplicity and the absence of certain planning considerations.  But for mere earthlings who have not even looked into income possibilities or who are not yet familiar with the issues to consider, the model and its charts could provide a starting point for meaningful thought and conversation.

    As noted above, this the GAO material is aimed at people in defined contribution retirement plans. But the multiple factors the report highlights are pertinent to people in the retail market as well.

    Linda Koco, MBA, is a contributing editor to AnnuityNews, specializing in life insurance, annuities and income planning. Linda may be reached at linda.koco@innfeedback.com.

    © Entire contents copyright 2013 by InsuranceNewsNet.com Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this article may be reprinted without the expressed written consent from InsuranceNewsNet.com.

    Originally Posted at AnnuityNews.com on December 20, 2013 by Linda Koco.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency