We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,131)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (413)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (799)
  • Wink's Articles (352)
  • Wink's Inside Story (273)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Industry, NAIC Official Criticize IAIS Time Line for Testing Global Capital Standard

    December 17, 2013 by Jeff Jeffrey

    WASHINGTON – Insurance industry representatives and experts for the National Association of Insurance Commissioners were united in their opposition to the time line laid out by international regulators for the creation of a global capital standard, as well as the one for proposed changes to the way insurance contracts are accounted for, during a committee meeting at the NAIC’s national meeting in Washington.

    Several industry representatives said that the International Association of Insurance Supervisors is moving too quickly in its effort to impose a capital standard for global systemically important insurers by way of the Common Framework for the Supervision of Internationally Active Insurance Groups. The IAIS aims to have the global capital standard, sometimes referred to as “basic capital requirements,” in place by 2016, following two years of field testing (Best’s News Service, Oct. 30, 2013).

    At the same time, the International Accounting Standards Board is conducting field tests of proposed changes to the Generally Accepted Accounting Practices guidelines that would affect how insurance contracts are accounted for on company balance sheets. The IASB’s push to have the changes implemented in the near future has drawn criticism from industry representatives and regulators alike.

    During the NAIC meeting, Robert Esson, a senior policy fellow for international affairs at the NAIC, said he worried the IASB may have “lost perspective” on the impact the proposed changes would have on the insurance industry.

    “I’m worried they are just going to ram through what they have proposed without paying attention to the numerous comment letters enumerating considerable problems with the IASB draft,” Esson said.

    Esson also said the IAIS has failed to answer a number of questions related to the proposed global capital standard that are “vital to ensuring the standard works.”

    The primary question that needs answering, Esson said, is how the standard will be calculated, given that there is no global accounting standard that is accepted in all jurisdictions where the capital standard will be applied.

    “Without a global accounting standard, many of the calculations will be based on a ‘best estimate,'” Esson said. “But you have to be careful with ‘best estimates’ because different parties, especially in the U.S., have different interpretations for how that is calculated.”

    Esson’s concerns were echoed by Jeff Alton, vice president of global regulatory policy and affairs at CNA Financial, who said the time line laid out by the IAIS to field test the proposed capital standard will place an undue burden on companies that volunteer to participate.

    Field testing for one part of the capital standard is scheduled to take place between March and May 2014. Alton said the field tests require companies to apply four separate calculation bases to their balance sheets to test for four different scenarios. Alton said that would require participating companies to evaluate 16 different stress scenarios.

    “We have significant concerns about the workload being placed on companies that volunteer and whether the workload is even going to provide results that are critical to the development of the standard” Alton said.

    He said much of the information collected by the field testing may be “interesting” but will not help regulators to achieve their goals.

    “ComFrame is supposed to provide horizontal comparability of international insurance companies,” Alton said. “But I think it is safe to say that each company’s internal [business] model is unique and isn’t easy to compare to other models.”

    Esson said he was “sympathetic” to Alton’s concerns and that some of the information being sought by the IAIS may be optional. “But I don’t know whether that is more of a theory because companies are likely to view the requests as mandatory,” Esson said.

    The IAIS proposal for a global capital standard has the support of the U.S. Federal Insurance Office.

    In October, FIO Director Michael McRaith said the global financial crisis of 2008 showed the international regulatory regime should be “more robust and comprehensive in scope, and jurisdictions should share a commitment to global standards.”

    However, some state regulators have opposed the idea of a global capital standard, saying the IAIS has failed to describe the problem the standard is supposed to fix.

    Connecticut Insurance Commissioner Thomas Leonardi said in October that the timeline of the standard’s implementation was “incredibly ambitious” and the IAIS must still decide how the standard would be enforced, where the capital should be held and how the capital would be allowed to flow among companies within a group.

    Leonardi said the proposal could also complicate international negotiations over ComFrame because previous proposals for a global standard have been a major sticking point in talks (Best’s News Service, Oct.30, 2013).

    (By Jeff Jeffrey, Washington Bureau manager: jeff.jeffrey@ambest.com)

    Originally Posted at A.M. Best on December 16, 2013 by Jeff Jeffrey.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency