We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,131)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (413)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (799)
  • Wink's Articles (352)
  • Wink's Inside Story (273)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Retirement savings: 3% is the new 4%

    December 9, 2013 by Robert Powell

    New rule of thumb on nest egg withdrawals takes more metrics into account, says new paper

    It’s all relative. How much retirees can safely withdraw from their retirement account each year is a mostly a function of current stock values and interest rates, which tend to predict near-term returns. And when stock market valuations are well above and bond yields are well below their historical averages, as they are today, retirees should withdraw much less than 4% of their portfolio, assuming they want their nest egg to last over the course of their household’s lifetime.

    Or at least so say the authors of “Asset Valuations and Safe Portfolio Withdrawal Rates,” a new paper that seeks to provide retirees and soon-to-be retirees with some new rules of thumb about withdrawal rates. The old rule of thumb, which traces its roots back to a 1994 paper published by financial planner William Bengen, suggests that you can safely withdraw 4% per year from your retirement accounts without worry of running out of money.

    The new rule of thumb, however, says you need to consider both current bond yields, stock values as measured by what’s called the cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings (CAPE) ratio, and your asset allocation before setting your withdrawal rate.

    “Our simulations indicate that the safety of a given withdrawal strategy is significantly affected by the initial bond yield and CAPE value at retirement, and that the relative impact varies based on the portfolio equity allocation,” wrote the authors of the paper, David Blanchett, CFA, CFP®, the head of retirement research at Morningstar Investment Management, Michael Finke, Ph.D., CFP®, a professor at Texas Tech University, and Wade Pfau, Ph.D., CFA®, a professor of retirement income at the American College.

    In April, when the authors first conducted their work, when bond yields were 2% and the stock market had a CAPE of 22, the authors said a standard 40% stocks/60% bond portfolio with a 4% initial withdrawal rate had a less than 50% chance of lasting over the course of a 30-year retirement.

    “That success rate is materially lower than past studies and has sobering implications on the likelihood of success for retirees today, as well as how much those near retirement may need to save to ensure a successful retirement,” the authors wrote.

    “The most important concept behind our research is that the 4% rule, and the majority of research that based on historical returns is unrealistic in today’s environment given market valuations,” says Blanchett. “Therefore, while 4% was, realistically, very safe historically, it is not nearly as safe for retirees today… 4% can still work, there’s just not the same margin of safety that has been their historically.”

    Of note, the CAPE ratio, which is also called the Shiller P/E (named after its creator Robert Shiller, Yale University professor and Nobel prize winner), is a popular price-to-earning metric. The earnings portion of the CAPE equation is the inflation-adjusted average of 10-year trailing earnings. The average CAPE ratio from 1881 to 2012 has been 16.4, although it has been slightly higher since 1960, averaging 19.5. The authors also noted there has been a relatively strong relationship between CAPE ratios and future stock returns. In November, the CAPE was at 25.2 in November, suggesting that stocks might be overvalued and headed for a fall. The yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury is presently 2.79%.

    Also of note, the studied 132 different years and found that there are only seven periods where the CAPE was above 20 and the yield on 10-year bonds was below 3.3% (1898, 1900, 1901, 1936, 2010, 2011, and 2012).

    So what withdrawal rate makes sense given today bond yields and stock market valuations?

    For his part, Blanchett says 4% is a good starting point for a retiree that has a diversified portfolio, who is revisiting their withdrawal decision annually, and is willing to take the potential for lower income at some point in the future.

    But an initial withdrawal rate of 3% might be an even safer starting point. “Since there are so many variables – age and remaining lifespan, longevity, risk aversion, asset allocation, and the like, it’s hard to say anything really general except that our finding is that ‘3% is the new 4%,'” says Pfau. “Low bond yields suggest low future bond returns, and as CAPE is now over 25, that suggests lower future stock returns. Put those together, and sustainable withdrawal rates on a forward-looking basis could end up being less than what worked in the historical record.”

    Of course, if interest rates rise, that would help justify increasing the withdrawal rate, but this might be offset in terms of spending by any capital losses experienced in bond funds, says Pfau. Likewise, if the stock market drops, he says the sustainable withdrawal rate looking forward from that point will be higher, but with the portfolio losses the person might not be able to spend any more.

    Finke agrees that 3% is the new 4%, but also says best strategy for retirees and would-be retirees who want their money to last a lifetime – in addition to using a 3% initial withdrawal rate – is to work a little longer, claim a larger Social Security benefit, and be willing to adjust your spending if your investments hit a rough patch. “If you’re retired right now, just be realistic about what you should expect on a portfolio given today’s stock and bond prices,” Finke says.

    And, if you’re afraid of running out of money, Finke says you can also consider buying an advanced life deferred annuity.  An advance life deferred annuity pays a monthly income later in life – say at age 80 or 85 – and can let you feel more comfortable about living well early in retirement.

    Originally Posted at USA Today on December 7, 2013 by Robert Powell.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency