We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,131)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (413)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (799)
  • Wink's Articles (352)
  • Wink's Inside Story (273)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • SAFE Bill Would Use Annuities to Secure Public Employee Pensions

    December 6, 2013 by Cyril Tuohy

    he defined benefit retirement model, which entered decline more than 20 years ago, may benefit from a reincarnation of sorts in the Secure Annuities for Employee Retirement (SAFE) Act of 2013 making the rounds in Congress.

    The SAFE Act would offer public employees a new type of defined benefit retirement plan built on fixed annuities. The aim would be to secure millions in guaranteed income for the workers’ lifetimes. Private sector workers would benefit as well because the bill would push the “nudge economics” that is supposed to help prepare workers for retirement.

    Backers of the bill, which was sponsored by Sen. Orrin G. Hatch, R-Utah, include insurance underwriters, the fixed annuities industry, financial advisors, the mutual fund industry and a host of powerful business lobbies, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Small Business Council of America.

    “This is using annuities in a very significant way, in the way they were intended to be used,” said Kim O’Brien, president and CEO of the National Association of Fixed Annuities.

    SAFE, the acronym, is just what it sounds like, she said. Retirees don’t lose their principal and receive an income on the back end.

    But the bill, which has yet to garner the support of any Democrats, is facing resistance from powerful unions including the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and the

    National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems (NCPERS), which represents 550 public-sector pension funds in the U.S. and Canada.

    NCPERS Executive Director and Counsel Hank Kim called the Hatch legislation “ill-conceived and unworkable.” He said it confuses the big deficits in private-sector pensions with the generally healthy state of public-sector pensions.

    “Public pension plans, on the other hand, are alive and well,” he said in a statement. Better investment returns since the financial crisis, along with “widespread procedural and operational reforms, have left public pension plans well-funded, financially healthy and sustainable for the long term.”

    Lacking any cosponsor, lawmakers, consumed with health care reform, aren’t likely to take up the bill before next year at the earliest. Meanwhile, whether public employee pensions are underfunded and by how much is a matter of real debate.

    Public employee unions say that by and large employee pension plans are generally well funded given the rebound of the financial markets.

    State and local governments collectively say they are $900 billion short on the funds needed for future promises, but a trio of scholars at the Brookings Institution estimate the unfunded liability at closer to $2.7 trillion.

    Funded ratios of state public pensions range from a low of 25 percent in Illinois to a high of 57 percent in Wisconsin, according to the Tax Foundation.

    O’Brien also said the bill represents a “new market opportunity” for the fixed annuities industry, which has struggled in recent years with low interest rates.

    The public pension changes under the bill would allow state and local employees to receive monthly income for life after they retire, O’Brien said. Not only would pension costs remain stable and predictable, there is no danger of underfunding, and retirement benefits are protected by state life insurance guaranty associations, she said.

    Kim of NCPERS, however, said the bill does little more than “hand public pension systems over to life insurance companies.”

    “Contracting out a nonprofit enterprise to a for-profit insurance company makes absolutely no sense,” he said. “Public pension plans are already in the business of providing their retirees with annuities. We self-annuitize – at a cost of 50 to 76 basis points, certainly a lower cost than a for-profit insurance company could offer.”

    Beyond changes to the public pension system, the SAFE Act’s private pension reform clauses would make it easier to cover employees through simpler, “starter” 401(k) plans and increased auto-escalation plan features. It would also make it easier for employers to move up to Safe Harbor 401(k) plans.

    Administrative burdens would also be reduced and hardship distributions simplified, according to the bill. Restrictions surrounding rollovers, forfeitures, minimum participation and 403(b) plan termination would also be lifted.

    The bill would also address longevity reforms. These would include expanding the ability of employers to offer annuities in defined contribution plans, updating mortality tables used by the U.S. Treasury for specific distributions, and making certain modifications to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).

     

    There’s still time to voice your opinion before the bill is finalized. Below are the members of the Senate Finance Committee and how to reach them online.

    The Senate Finance Committee
    MAX BAUCUS MT D www.baucus.senate.gov
    JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER WV D www.rockefeller.senate.gov
    RON WYDEN OR D www.wyden.senate.gov
    CHARLES E. SCHUMER NY D www.schumer.senate.gov
    DEBBIE STABENOW MI D www.stabenow.senate.gov
    MARIA CANTWELL WA D www.cantwell.senate.gov
    BILL NELSON FL D www.billnelson.senate.gov
    ROBERT MENENDEZ NJ D www.menendez.senate.gov
    THOMAS R. CARPER DE D www.carper.senate.gov
    BENJAMIN L. CARDIN ND D www.cardin.senate.gov
    SHERROD BROWN OH D www.brown.senate.gov
    MICHAEL F. BENNET CO D www.bennet.senate.gov
    ROBERT P. CASEY PA D www.casey.senate.gov
    ORRIN G. HATCH UT R www.hatch.senate.gov
    CHUCK GRASSLEY IO R www.grassley.senate.gov
    MIKE CRAPO ID R www.crapo.senate.gov
    PAT ROBERTS KS R www.roberts.senate.gov
    MICHAEL F. ENZI WY R www.enzi.senate.gov
    JOHN D. CORNYN TX R www.cornyn.senate.gov
    JOHN D. THUNE SD R www.thune.senate.gov
    RICHARD BURR NC R www.burr.senate.gov
    JOHNNY ISAKSON GA R www.isakson.senate.gov
    ROB PORTMAN OH R www.portman.senate.gov
    PATRICK J. TOOMEY PA R www.toomey.senate.gov

    InsuranceNewsNet has put together an online page of resources to help you learn more about the SAFE Act and how to ask your Senator to support the bill.    Go to insurancenewsnet.com/SAFE

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet Magazine on December 2013 by Cyril Tuohy.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency