We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Average IA Commissions Dip To Lowest Level Ever

    January 14, 2014 by Linda Koco

    Indexed annuities hit more than one quarterly record in third quarter. The record that’s been getting all the industry attention lately is the sales high of slightly over $10 billion. But commissions paid to indexed annuity agents also hit a record — a record low, that is.

    The indexed annuity commission received by the agent averaged 5.66 percent of premium for the quarter, according to Wink’s Sales & Market Report 3rd Quarter, 2013.

    That is down by 5.5 percent from second quarter’s average agent commission of 6 percent. It is also the “lowest-ever” average commission paid to the indexed annuity sales agent, the researcher said.

    The average weighted commission paid to the agent in the quarter ranged from 0.03 percent to 8.69 percent of premium, the report said.

    What’s behind it?

    There is some history behind the decline.  According to data from Wink, average agent commissions dropped into the 6 percent zone in second quarter of 2009. After that, they hovered in the 6.8 percent to 6.7 percent range for quite a while but then started declining on until third quarter 2013 when the average dropped into the 5 percent zone.

    Previously, between 2003 and early 2009, agent commissions for these products were higher, ranging from 8 percent to 7 percent.

    [Note: Because the quarterly numbers are averages, outlier data on the low and/or high commission side could account for an abrupt shift in average commissions. But because Wink calculates its numbers on a consistent basis, the trend-line provides a meaningful look at what has been happening over time.]

    Based on the averages shown, it’s easy to see the deleterious effects of the Great Recession on commissions.

    Annuity company executives have confirmed that in interviews with InsuranceNewsNet as well as in public speeches.  The financial pressure on capital stemming from the Great Recession and the long period of low interest rates that followed forced many carriers to tweak back not only on crediting rates, policy features and marketing plans but also, finally, on commissions, they said.

    It remains to be seen whether the record low for third quarter commissions is a signal that the whittling-back strategy is continuing for a while longer, or perhaps a sign that a bottom is in formation. Both trends could be happening simultaneously, with some carriers holding the line a bit longer while others take a pause as they prepare for a rebound later in 2014.

    The upturn in interest rates will factor into this. As the chart below illustrates, rates are not yet at levels that would nudge carriers to unleash aggressive sales campaigns with enticing commissions. Today’s rates have not even reached early 2009 levels. However, some insurance executives have said the upward creep in rates over the past several months has already made life easier, so competitiveness may be the other side of the tweaking coin.

    The market share factor

    Wink’s third quarter report contains some other data that bears on the commission picture in the indexed annuity business.

    For one thing, the market share of the various distribution channels saw some interesting changes. The bank, broker-dealer and career channels increased their indexed annuity market share at the expense of the independent agency channel, according to the Wink researchers.

    Independent agents still took the biggest share of the business, though. They produced about eight out of every 10 indexed annuities sold in the quarter. But in third quarter 2012 and 2011, independent agents sold nine — not eight — of every 10 indexed annuities sold, according to Wink’s earlier reports. So the balance of power shifted a bit in the recent quarter, as competitors nipped at the heels of the independents.

    In particular, banks sold their way into an 11.1 percent indexed annuity market share in third quarter. That’s up from 7.1 percent in third quarter 2012, and from 6.6 percent in third quarter 2011, according to Wink figures.

    Assuming that banks pay smaller commissions to their sales agents than do other channels, the galloping bank sales may help explain at least some of the average commission decline that Wink’s radar picked up.

    Sales at broker-dealers (wirehouse only) also got a small bounce. Their indexed annuity sales represented a third quarter market share of 2.5 percent. That’s not a big piece of the pie, but it is up from 1.2 percent in third quarter 2012, and it put broker-dealer production back close to where it was in third quarter 2011 (a 2.9 percent share).

    Given that wirehouses are not known to be particularly fond of indexed annuities, this turn of events deserves at least a one-eyebrow salute.

    The surrender charge factor

    The surrender charge periods also merit attention. In third quarter, 81 percent of policies sold had a surrender charge period of 10 years or less. That’s an increase over the third quarters of both 2012 and 2011, when the 10-year or less category totaled 77.9 percent in each year.

    In particular, products with surrender charges of six years or less increased their share to 7.5 percent of total sales from 4.9 percent in third quarter 2012, according to Wink; and products in the seven-year category increased to an 11.5 percent share from 4.9 percent the year previous. Meanwhile, products in the eight-to-nine year surrender charge category remained level at 8.2 percent between the two years and those with 10-year surrender charges dropped share to 53.8 percent from the year-earlier third quarter share of 59.9 percent.

    The significance of the surrender charge numbers is two-fold. First, the numbers demonstrate that sales are continuing to favor products with shorter surrender charge periods, a trend begun several years ago and that carriers have facilitated with product manufacture.

    Second, the decline in surrender period may be contributing to or allied with the decline in commissions. In general, indexed products with longer surrender periods tend to pay higher commissions than those with shorter surrender periods; so if fewer of the long-surrender products are sold, the average commission numbers will fall in response.

    In sum, third quarter had quite an indexed annuity story to tell. It was a time when indexed annuity sales broke all previous quarterly sales records to reach a new high while average indexed annuity commissions fell to their lowest point ever.

    Annuity specialists who focus only on (or mainly on) indexed annuity sales may have suffered a financial setback of sorts if they or their products were caught up in the commission squeeze. But if they made it up on volume — which could have happened, given the record high indexed annuity sales for the quarter — or if they added other products and services to their menu, they may have broken even or possibly come out ahead.

    For agents who sell without regard to commission, some the above discussion will be of only passing interest. Their eyes will focus more on what is going on inside the products (with features, options, flexibility, etc.), how those changes will fit customer needs and the strength of the carriers that back the products. But even these agents will take the commission trend as a barometer of sorts about how the industry is faring.

    If commissions continue to drop, at what point will this force agents and distributors out of the business and/or spur them to adopt new practices that enable them to continue? It will take future quarters to get a better handle on this.

    Linda Koco, MBA, is a contributing editor to AnnuityNews, specializing in life insurance, annuities and income planning. Linda may be reached at linda.koco@innfeedback.com.

     

    Wink’s note: Interview comments may have been taken out of context by the articles author(s). Wink’s media team may be reached at support@winkintel.com

    Originally Posted at AnnuityNews.com on January 8, 2014 by Linda Koco.

    Categories: Wink's Articles
    currency