We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • FSOC: Reinsurance Captives, Low Interest Rates Could Undermine Stability of Life Insurers

    May 9, 2014 by Jeff Jeffrey

    WASHINGTON – State and federal regulators should continue to monitor life insurance companies’ use of captive reinsurance entities as well as their investment strategies amid the ongoing low-interest environment, according to findings included in the Financial Stability Oversight Council’s annual report. Both captives and investment strategies could pose threats to their financial stability, the report found.

    The multi-agency report focused on potential risks to the U.S. financial system that could result from the business practices of a broad range of financial institutions, including insurance companies. It was released during the FSOC’s May 7 open meeting.

    “This report underscores the improvements the nation’s financial system has made since the financial crisis and shows the council’s commitment to look toward the future–and not just look in the rear-view mirror,” said Treasury Secretary Jacob “Jack” Lew, who chairs the 15-member FSOC.

    The potential dangers associated with cybersecurity were a key theme of the report, which said cyber risks should be a top concern for all market players. Nearly every member of the council mentioned cybersecurity during their remarks.

    The report concluded that the rising popularity of captive reinsurance entities could create risks that escape the notice of the traditional state-led regulatory system for insurance.

    The report said that while captive reinsurance transactions must be approved by both the captive and primary insurers’ regulators, the opportunity for regulatory arbitrage arises because of state-by-state differences in oversight, accounting and capital requirements for the two types of entities.”

    “In addition, in most instances, unlike primary insurers, reinsurance captives are required neither to file public statutory financial statements nor to follow the same regulatory accounting practices as primary insurers,” the report said.

    The report notes that many life insurers have been using captive reinsurers, in part, to avoid having to meet certain regulatory requirements.

    If captive reinsurers are not monitored properly, the report said they could exacerbate a troubled primary insurer’s financial problems.

    As an example, the report lays out a scenario in which a parent company providing a guarantee to a captive suffers financial distress. If the parent company were unable to properly capitalize the captive, the primary insurer could lose credit for the reinsurance on its statutory balance sheet and could experience a capital shortfall. That could complicate the resolution of a large insurance company, the report said.

    “Regulators and rating agencies have noted that the broad use of captive reinsurance by life insurers may result in regulatory capital ratios that potentially understate risk,” the report said.

    During the meeting, S. Roy Woodall Jr., who serves as the independent member of FSOC with insurance expertise, said state regulators should take note of the report’s “express concerns” about the use of captive reinsurance entities in the life sector.

    “It sends an important signal to our state insurance regulators as they address supervisory issues tied to the use of captive insurance,” Woodall said.

    The FSOC’s report also reiterated a finding made by the council last year regarding the pressure insurers have been under during what has become a prolonged low-interest rate environment. The report said that as interest rates remain low, many life insurers have pursued investment strategies that pose greater risks than traditional investment-grade fixed-income investments.

    The report said some insurers have increasingly turned to commercial mortgage loans, equity real estate and alternative assets such as private equity funds and hedge funds. All of those strategies are less liquid than traditional investments.

    “Life insurers, which typically have investments in longer-duration fixed-income assets that are held to maturity to match long-tail liabilities, are vulnerable to interest rate volatility if they have to sell such assets prior to maturity to meet liability cash flow demands,” the report said.

    The report recommended that the Federal Insurance Office and state regulators continue to monitor risks resulting from severe interest rate shocks.

    The FSOC also adopted amendments to its transparency policy that will require the council to post meeting agendas and minutes to its website more quickly. When the FSOC decides to meet behind closed doors, the amendments require the council to provide information about why those decisions are made.

    Missouri Insurance Director John Huff, who serves as a non-voting member of FSOC, praised the council’s adoption of an updated transparency policy, noting that the National Association of Insurance Commissioners recently updated its transparency policy.

    But both Huff and Woodall said the FSOC should be more forceful in pressuring international regulatory bodies to be more transparent. The insurance industry has criticized the International Association of Insurance Supervisors and the G-20’s Financial Stability Board for making decisions without sufficient transparency.

    “I am somewhat sympathetic to some of our colleagues who feel excluded, as I have been personally frustrated in similar fashion at the level of international transparency,” Woodall said.

    In March, Woodall and the Federal Reserve joined the IAIS as observers. Their participation at the IAIS is expected to assist them in better monitoring the IAIS’ work related to global financial stability and also in consulting with international counterparts. Regulatory decisions will continue to be performed by voting insurance regulators on the IAIS.

    Following the FSOC’s meeting, David Snyder, the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America’s vice president for international insurance policy, praised Huff and Woodall for calling for greater transparency at the international level.

    “We clearly support the FSOC’s updated transparency policy, but it is especially important for international bodies, which have been making decisions behind closed doors,” Snyder said.

    Originally Posted at A.M. Best on May 7, 2014 by Jeff Jeffrey.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency