We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Advisors Vexed On Annuities’ Fiduciary Risk

    June 25, 2014 by Maureen Nevin Duffy

    Workers of the baby boom population are painfully aware that if they lose their savings in another financial crisis, they won’t have enough working years left to earn it back before retirement. About 78% of respondents age 50 and older in one poll say retirement security has become a more important issue for them in the last two to three years.

    No wonder 62% told benefits researchers Towers Watson that they would give up some pay for a guaranteed retirement benefit in the consultants’ 2013/2014 Global Benefit Attitudes Survey, released last month. With employer-sponsored retirement plans still skittish about adding guaranteed income policies to their platforms, those near or in retirement may turn to their familiar financial advisor or RIA for help figuring out the best annuity for them. But will offering that advice open advisors to fiduciary liability?

    “You advise people to do something, you become the fiduciary—game, set, match,” says attorney Marsha S. Wagner, founder of the Boston-based Wagner Law Group. “So they better be damn sure they know what they’re advising.” To that end, Wagner recommends advisors take a crash course in annuities, especially the variable and indexed annuities, since guaranteed income riders are commonly added to them, sometimes providing payments up until death. And that’s a long time to be monitoring an annuity provider.

    “It’s a continuous job,” says Wagner. “Financial advisors are now in a situation where to stay in the industry they must have a working knowledge of guaranteed lifetime withdrawal benefits, independent of whether they want to be fiduciaries or not. They must be able to educate people. And if they can’t, they need to partner with people who can.” Wagner sees this as part of an evolving trend in best practices for advisors. “Baby boomers want paychecks for life,” she adds.

    This form of insurance has attracted the interest of regulators, too, who want to make defined contribution plans (in which workers are responsible for their own saving and investing with an employer’s help if not always its money) look more like defined benefit pension plans. DB plans, like your father may have had, kept the liability of a lifetime monthly pension payment with the employer. To give today’s employees some savings protection and income guarantee, regulators, like the Department of Labor, want to incentivize plan sponsors to add in-plan annuities to their DC platforms. But the task of vetting and selecting one or more annuity providers and monitoring them for the life of each employee is expected to test the capacity of most sponsors and their ability to pay for such long-term services.

    Among several possible solutions being considered is turning to investment advisors or fund providers to vet and monitor insurers, but so far the major companies in those industries are not offering to take on the fiduciary responsibility. Wagner says a limited liability of, say, two years might work, before the fiduciary obligation reverts to the employee or retiree. That would be similar to the Labor Department’s current safe-harbor guidelines for distributing retirement plan assets upon retirement. The sponsor’s liability ends when the funds are transferred.

    Sponsors are already being nudged by the Department of Labor, in a recent list of “tips,” to offer participants more custom investment options, such as custom target-date funds. The use of local financial advisors, who would hopefully have a more comprehensive picture of a participant’s financial needs, is also being considered. The option has “generated a lot of interest in the role local advisors or planners may play,” notes Catherine Gordon, a principal in Vanguard’s Investment Strategy Group.

    Clients will be asking for help in the “decumulation” stage of retirement, too, says Wagner. “This could be as or even more important than the savings stage.” This post-retirement period really is the culmination, the final test, of a lifetime of retirement planning. The careful distribution of these monies is crucial to elderly clients, who are totally dependent on their savings. This is where the diligence in vetting a company now will pay off 30 or 40 years down the road.

    The specter of policy defaults loom. Though rare in the industry, they have happened. The ’90s saw several large insurers go under: Executive Life Insurance Co. of California, which had A.M. Best’s highest rating until January 1990, failed in1991. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company of Newark, Confederation Life Insurance Co. and California-based First Capital Holdings fell because of asset runs by investors. Today, Wagner believes, “some of the state insurance guarantee funds would have a very difficult time trying to make someone whole. Someone buys an annuity thinking, ‘I’m safe.’” She cautions that advisors have a duty to know the insurers’ assets, surpluses, reserves, lawsuits, complaints—and where the companies are based, since guarantee funds vary widely from one state to the next, she says.

    And troubled insurers are not just a thing of the past. The Phoenix Companies of Hartford, Conn., which makes guarantees on variable and fixed indexed annuity contracts, including products with guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits and guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits, has lost its Moody’s rating because there was insufficient financial information on the company. The Phoenix Companies filed its 10-K for 2012 on the last day of 2013. The SEC issued a cease-and-desist order on March 21 addressing the company’s late filings and issued new strict deadlines. Standard & Poor’s as of May 8 had a “B-” rating on Phoenix with a negative outlook. A.M. Best in August downgraded the Phoenix Companies’ subsidiaries, dropping their financial strength ratings to “B” (fair) from “B+” (good) and issuer credit ratings to “bb+” from “bbb-”. All of the company’s ratings are below investment grade. As of May 7, its share price was down 23.4% since the first of the year, according to InvestorPlace.com.

    “It’s incredible—scary,” says Wagner, one of the only principals interviewed for this article who was aware of the company’s problems. “Wouldn’t that financial advisor advising someone to go into that company’s products have some fiduciary concerns? Maybe? There could be potential fiduciary liability certainly.” Wagner cautions about using third-party experts, too. “They’re only as good as their expertise. Check their qualifications, previous recommendations, years in the industry, costs-to-benefit. Do a prudent investigation.” Apparently there’s no getting rid of fiduciary liability. Says Wagner, “It can and will come back … the fiduciary boomerang.”

    There is still another type of annuity request advisors are getting—clients looking for valuations of existing annuities in light of their current situations. Here, Stephen Esposito, who works directly with fee-only fiduciary advisors and planners, assists clients as part of Parsippany, N.J.-based Macro Consulting’s year-old annuity review program. Nearly 90% of the benefits Esposito fields questions about involve guaranteed withdrawal benefits. Macro has gotten inquiries from more than 150 advisors to date asking about variable annuities, which he calls very complex products.

    Some inside advice: Esposito says the insurers could afford to be much more generous before the financial crisis. So most of the older or legacy annuities are better than today’s. “After 2008, insurance companies started pulling back on the attractiveness of guarantees. So a lot of older contracts—2010 or earlier—are very difficult to replicate today.”

    His fee is $399 for a consultation, which is good for up to two contracts. After that it’s $99 for each additional call. Advisors shouldn’t be embarrassed to ask, Esposito says. Even CFPs who have already bought annuities for their own use have called him after the fact for clarification on some of the finer points. And advice might even help advisors avoid a lawsuit for failure to exercise fiduciary due diligence.

    Originally Posted at Financial Advisor on June 2, 2014 by Maureen Nevin Duffy.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency