We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Fixed Annuity Transactions Soar In First Half Of 2014

    September 24, 2014 by Linda Koco

    First-half annuity sales numbers from the Depository Trust & Clearing Corp. (DTCC) point to strong growth for fixed annuities but modest growth for variable annuities.

    That might be expected, considering that other industry researchers have reported similar results.

    But there’s a difference. The DTCC numbers are based on actual annuity transactions, not a survey of companies, Andrew Blumberg, group director-analytic reporting for DTCC, told AnnuityNews. These numbers show actual inflows (sales) in the firm’s Analytic Reporting for Annuities database. They also show outflows (money taken out during the period) and net flows (inflows minus outflows).

    DTCC’s Insurance & Retirement Services (I&RS) business processes the transactions of seven types of annuities — including fixed, variable, group, indexed and immediate. This is business produced by third-party distribution (i.e., no captive or career distribution). Total annuity transactions amounted to nearly $104 billion in first half, Blumberg said.

    The fixed annuity picture

    As for fixed annuities, inflows soared 130 percent in the first half to $14 billion, up from $6 billion in first half last year.

    Variable annuity inflows increased too, but by only 3 percent to $37 billion, up from last year’s $36 billion.

    The percentage differences are even more striking when viewing net flows. On this basis, fixed annuity net flows increased by $2 billion, or 150 percent, from first half 2013 when net flows were -$3 billion, according to the I&RS report.

    Meanwhile, variable annuity net flows dropped by 74 percent in the first half, to $1.4 billion from $5.4 billion in the same period last year.

    The decrease on the variable side is not necessarily bad, Blumberg commented. Several variable annuity companies have publicly stated that they were trying to reduce the amount of risk they have, and some even encouraged customers to leave certain product types, he noted. This is part of a de-risking strategy that has been the topic of much discussion in recent years.

    Because of that, the first-half numbers may indicate something positive or negative, he said.

    “Another point to keep in mind that the I&RS numbers are in the aggregate. But on an individual basis, even though some companies were trying to reduce risk, others were trying to grow their business.”

    Concerning the sharp increase in fixed annuities, Blumberg said his firm has heard anecdotally that some of the increased inflows likely occurred because buyers were looking for greater yield than they could get on products such as bank certificates of deposit. Other customers were looking for the fixed income that fixed annuities can provide, he said.

    Market share

    In terms of market share, DTCC provided AnnuityNews with some numbers illustrating how this has changed in recent years. The numbers come from a breakout of the seven annuity categories that I&RS uses.

    In the first half of 2014, traditional fixed annuities represented 13 percent of total inflows, this data shows. That’s up from a 7.5 percent share in the same period last year and a 10 percent share the year before that. However, in 2011, the fixed annuity share was slightly higher than in 2014, coming in at a bit over 14 percent in the first half. (Numbers are rounded.)

    By comparison, variable annuity market share of inflows have declined over the same years to 60 percent in 2014. By comparison, the first-half market share in 2013 was 77 percent. In 2012, it was 74 percent and in 2011, it was 70 percent.

    Some other annuity categories that I&RS uses are also fixed products. However, the researchers separate these numbers from the traditional fixed annuity category due to unique product features. If those other categories are combined with the fixed annuity share, the total fixed annuity share for first half inflows this year would be nearly 40 percent, up from 30 percent in 2011.

    One of those other fixed categories is indexed annuities. The first-half share of processed transactions for these products rose to 9 percent in 2014 from 3 percent last year, 2 percent in 2012, and 1.5 percent in 2011. Another category, the fixed immediate annuity, saw a smaller but not as dramatic climb — to 3.5 percent share in 2014 from 3 percent in 2013, 2 percent in 2012, and 1 percent in 2011.

    The growth may be reflecting increased sales of indexed and immediate annuities in third-party distribution. But it may also be reflecting that more firms are using DTCC services for processing various types of annuity transactions in addition to variable annuities, which today represent around 60 percent of transactions (down from about 70 percent in 2011.)

    Top 10

    Fixed annuities made their presence felt in another area as well in the first half. This occurred on the list of top 10 products.

    That list includes two fixed annuity products — the Allianz 360 Fixed Annuity (an indexed annuity) and the NYL Secure Term MVA Fixed Annuity II (a fixed annuity). At year end 2013, only one of those products was in the top 10 list (the NYL Secure Term policy), and there were no fixed annuity products in the top ten in first half 2013, Blumberg said.

    Measured on a net flow basis, the Allianz 360 product was the top-ranked fixed annuity in first-half 2014, followed by the NYL Secure Term.

    As for the top 10 insurance/holding companies for annuities overall, they accounted for more than $19 billion in positive net flows, I&RS said. This represents almost 90 percent of total positive net flows for first half 2014 — up from just over $15 billion among the top 10 in first-half 2013.

    The report is based on business submitted by 120 insurance companies (including 44 holding companies) and nearly 600 distributors.

    “It’s estimated that our numbers represent two-thirds of overall annuity business,” Blumberg said.

     

    Originally Posted at AnnuityNews on September 24, 2014 by Linda Koco.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency