We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • A Call For Greater Tech Use By Annuity Producers

    October 2, 2014 by Linda Koco

    The existing system of bringing new producers on board a life and annuity carrier is not always a slam dunk. The problems are particularly acute in the independent agency system, according to a new report on insurance producer management from Aite Group.

    The problem is the technology that is used to make it all happen — or rather, the technology that’s often not used.

    The brokerage general agency (BGA) channel, which is the largest distribution channel for selling life products via independent agents, is the site of the biggest “pain point,” according to the report.

    The carriers using this channel have difficulties with producer onboarding, credential management, compensation calculation and payment, and performance reporting, the report said.

    BGAs are constantly recruiting new producers and trying to onboard these producers to select carriers as efficiently as possible, the researchers allowed. However, many carriers commonly use a manual, paper-based process when onboarding these producers.

    That’s a problem because paper-based approaches traditionally have caused not-in-good-order (NIGO) rates of more than 50 percent at those carriers, the study found.

    Readers will recognize that NIGO problems are not exactly new. Carriers encountered NIGOs for years when all life and annuity insurance applications were handled by paper. With the rise of software systems that enable producers to enter applications electronically, these problems have subsided. But NIGOs still exist in field offices where there is lack of suitable online access and/or where agencies have difficulties using the technology.

    What the new report is spotlighting is yet another area where NIGO problems still live.

    Other problems

    The researchers found some other problems related to the BGA channel too. For example, once new producers are on board, carriers encounter difficulties with calculating the correct commissions and incentive compensation for those BGA-contracted producers.

    “It is typical for BGA sales hierarchies to be 10 people or more deep,” the researchers explained. That is, one producer recruits other producers and then receives a share of those new producers’ commissions. Then, those new producers recruit still other producers and likewise share in those commissions. With so many layers, the compensation calculations get tangled.

    The frequent use of “ad hoc” types of incentive compensation, like special types of bonuses and trips, adds to the complexity, the researchers said. So does a “significant reliance” on commission advances to help smooth producers’ income.

    It’s not just carriers that struggle with this. After the carriers complete their calculations and pay their commissions and incentive compensation to BGAs and producers, “the pain transitions to the BGA,” the researchers said.

    Here too, a paper-based system appears to be a trouble spot. It is still standard practice to send bulk, non-itemized commission payments to producers and their BGAs, often using paper, the researchers explained. That forces the BGA to reconcile the accuracy of producer commissions and incentive payments “in a very manual, inefficient way.”

    It may seem that the researchers have uncovered a seemingly hopeless problem. But that’s not the direction of their remarks. They couched the problem in terms of it being an opportunity for carriers.

    “With industrywide life insurance policy sales continuing to fall,” they wrote, “simplifying this non-itemized, hard-to-reconcile approach to commission calculation provides a major opportunity for life and annuity companies to differentiate themselves with BGAs and take a larger part of a shrinking pie.”

    Some relevant points have to do with what independent producers want. The study found that:

    • They want a single user interface that is already embedded in their existing workflows to complete their onboarding (as well as new-business submission, in-force business and compensation-reporting requirements).
    • They do not want to access multiple insurance company-specific producer portals, all with different workflows.

    About annuity sales

    The researchers had some words specifically concerning sales of annuity products and the prospects for broker/dealers (BDs) versus BGAs in this market.

    In the past 10 years, BDs have become increasingly important distribution channels for annuities, they wrote. The comments did not indicate whether the reference was to variable annuity sales, fixed annuity sales or both. Based on industry trends, the reference is most likely to variable annuities, with some fixed annuities mixed in (since BDs have been selling more of these products in recent times).

    The problem the researchers identified is that reps at wirehouses and independent BDs often want to be paid electronically on the same or next day. They also want automated processing for commission chargebacks or other exceptions.

    The top 20 carriers that sell annuities through the top 10 BDs can meet these requirements, the researchers said. But that’s not the case with carriers that want to grow sales through non-top-10 BDs and banks. Those other carriers need to increase automation of their commission setup, calculation, and reporting capabilities to become competitive, the Aite report said.

    Originally Posted at AnnuityNews on October 1, 2014 by Linda Koco.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency