We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (16,283)
  • Industry Conferences (3)
  • Industry Job Openings (9)
  • Negative Media (138)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (605)
  • Sheryl's Blogs (171)
  • Wink's Articles (235)
  • Wink's Blogs (216)
  • Wink's Press Releases (94)
  • Blog Archives

  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Explaining and Measuring Return

    October 8, 2014 by Lowell Aronoff

    FROM AN INCOME ANNUITY

    PART TWO

    In this final article of a two-part series, we’ll discuss quantifying the value of an income annuity by comparing it to more common investment products and strategies.

    As you know, many retiring clients have spent their financial lives accumulating a nest egg. These retiring clients may feel that allocating a portion of their retirement savings toward a product that pays them a check every month is an investment. So it’s natural to utilize accumulation metrics such as “yield” to compare different products. In the first part of this series, we included a hypothetical example showing how a lifetime income annuity could benefit a healthy 65-year-old woman with a $100,000 premium. As you may recall, the lifetime income annuity with a 10-year guarantee would pay about $5251 per month, and we could graph the client’s future yield against various ages when she might die.

    We showed that her yield at life expectancy was very close to the yield (net of commission and expenses) of that of a similar high-quality, long-term bond fund. This ignores, however, the insurance element of income annuities. Instead it’s asking: Should our client…

    1. Buy an income annuity or purchase a different product now?

    2. Buy an annuity at a future date when it is “cheaper” because she’s older?

    Also, in the previous article, we showed how — by using the Implied Longevity YieldTM (ILY) tool — it is hard to beat the return from an income annuity for a 65-year-old client. Keep in mind that ILY assumes future interest rates will not change from their current lows. So another question may arise: If the client feels interest rates will increase in the next few years, should she purchase an income annuity now or wait?

    Income annuity rates are driven by a yield curve not dissimilar from the Treasury Yield Curve. Let’s examine a case where we assume that in five years, the client will be able to purchase an annuity based on a yield curve that is as good as the best rate that has been available in the past 10 years. CANNEX publishes an index of income annuity rates called the CANNEX Payout Annuity Yield Index (PAY)TM. In the past 10 years, PAYTM rates peaked in 2009 according to this index, as shown in the chart below.

    The client will be five years older when these hypothetical (assumed and fictitious) rates become available. Would she be better off waiting?

    There are a few more assumptions needed to round out this. To make the scenarios fair, we need to assume a few factors in both cases (buying now versus waiting):

    1. $100,000 of retirement savings would be allocated for the purchase.

    2. The monthly withdrawal amount would be the same at $525.

    At the end of May 2014, the Treasury was showing a yield curve for one-, five-, 10- and 30-year rates of approximately 0.25%, 1.5%, 2.5% and 3.5%, respectively. We will assume that the client chooses to invest in the five-year Treasury while waiting. Remember that Treasury rates peaked in June 2008 at approximately 2.5%, 3.75%, 4.25% and 4.75%, respectively, as shown in the “Projected” rates on the next page. In other words, would the client regret her decision to wait five years to purchase an income annuity if rates at that time were more favorable than they have been in the past 10 years?

    The math is difficult, but the tools to calculate these “what if” scenarios are available. In this case the client would be slightly better off purchasing the annuity now. However, if she could find an investment that is as secure as a guarantee offered by an insurance carrier, flexible enough to allow monthly withdrawals, and paid 2% while she waits, she may be slightly better off waiting.

    Based on the hypothetical example on the next page, it is clear that the yield generated by an income annuity should not deter a 65-year-old client from purchasing an income annuity. Yield is an intangible concept that is very useful in the client’s accumulation years. Once retired, she will probably be more concerned about tangible concepts like having a large enough monthly check to cover her needs. In other words, the client should be less interested in knowing what the yield is on her investment and more focused on knowing whether her overall strategy can and will continue to generate the income she needs and meet her other objectives.

    The most common strategy in use today is a Systematic Withdrawal Plan (SWP). A consideration that is far more tangible than yield is whether adding an income annuity improves the outlook of an SWP that pays 4% per year, increasing with inflation.

    Let’s go back to our example and suppose that the client has $400,000 in investable assets in a 60% (equities)/40% (bond) portfolio. She wants to know whether the purchase of a $100,000 income annuity can help her improve her retirement. For the purpose of this illustration, we will assume that her return from equities will be consistent at 5%. We’ll also assume that her bonds will yield a consistent 2.5% and inflation will run at 1.5%.

    Purchasing the income annuity involves a trade-off, as does purchasing any investment or insurance product. Because she has transferred the risk of depleting $100,000 of assets to an insurance company, and the annuity provides $6,300 per year — substantially more than the $4,000 — she could withdraw from that portion of the SWP. She can spend more in retirement without increasing her risk of depleting assets. This additional amount that the client can spend accumulates with time and is highlighted by the blue line below. However, if the client ends up living a short life, her estate will be less valuable than it would have been had she not purchased the annuity. This decrease in her estate is represented by the red line below. As you can see, the longer the client lives, the smaller the cost to her estate will be for purchasing an income annuity.

    The distance between the two lines represents the financial benefit (on the right side of the graph) or financial loss (on the left) from the purchase of the income annuity. In other words, if the client lives 20 years (where the lines meet) or more, there would be a financial benefit to owning the income annuity. Statistics tell us that if this client is in good health, the likelihood that she will live another 20 years is 68%.

    While the income annuity provides clients with a very competitive yield, a far more important financial consideration is whether it provides the client with the ability to safely withdraw more money from her portfolio. In this case, it does. There are also nonfinancial considerations. Would the income benefits guaranteed by a financially strong insurance company help give the client peace of mind? Do her children have valid concerns about having to support a potentially penniless mother? Will she maintain her ability to make financial decisions as she enters extreme old age? Would the reduced need to worry about where her money comes from lead to a potentially happier retirement? If the answer to some of these questions is yes, then it’s time to consider an income annuity.

    1 Average of five competitive rates from CANNEX.
    2 SOA A200 Mortality Table with 1% improvement per year.

     

    Originally Posted at NAFA Annuity Outlook on September 2014 by Lowell Aronoff.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency