We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Fed Launches Study of New Capital Standards for SIFIs

    October 2, 2014 by Jeff Jeffrey

    WASHINGTON – The Federal Reserve Board has reached out to the large insurance holding companies it is charged with regulating in order to get their help in creating a new capital regulatory framework.

    The Fed announced it has launched a quantitative impact study that will evaluate the potential effects of imposing new consolidated capital requirements on systemically important financial institutions. The study is designed to help the board construct a capital framework that takes into account the unique nature of the insurance business while also fulfilling the requirements of the Dodd-Frank financial reform act, the Fed said in a statement.

    The Dodd-Frank Act includes a provision known as the Collins Amendment, which requires the establishment of minimum risk-based and leverage requirements for firms that are designated as systemically important financial institutions.

    “The QIS is being conducted to allow the Board to better understand how to design a capital framework for insurance holding companies it supervises that is compliant with the Collins Amendment,” the Fed said in a statement. “Information collected through the QIS would allow for further exploration of areas of concern raised by commenters during the proposal stage of the revised regulatory capital framework rulemaking.”

    The Fed said it has contacted the companies it supervises, asking them to participate in the study. The central bank said participation is voluntary.

    To date, the Fed oversees just two insurance SIFIs: American International Group Inc. and Prudential Financial Inc. MetLife Inc. been named a preliminary SIFI, but the company is in the process of challenging the designation.

    The capital requirements would also apply to savings and loan holding companies, including those with substantial insurance underwriting activity.

    It is unclear whether additional companies will be invited to participate in the study. Efforts to reach the Fed for additional comment were not immediately successful.

    The companies will have until Dec. 31 to submit responses to the study. They have until Oct. 10 to decide whether to participate.

    The Fed’s study asks the companies to provide information about regulatory capital components and ratios; risk-weighted assets; separate account data; and state-based or foreign equivalent risk-based capital requirements.

    Responses to the study will remain confidential, the Fed said.

    The Fed has been working to develop new capital standards for non-bank SIFIs for over a year. That effort has been complicated by confusion over how the Collins amendment should be interpreted.

    Fed officials have said the Collins Amendment limits the central bank’s ability to distinguish between banks and insurance companies when setting capital standards.

    The insurance industry has warned applying the same capital standards to banks and insurers could cause severe disruptions in the marketplace because the two businesses are fundamentally different.

    But recently, the U.S. House passed a bill that would make it clear the Fed has the ability to set different capital standards for banks and insurers.

    The bill passed by the House on Sept. 17 would make is clear that insurance companies that under the Fed’s supervision are not required to meet bank-centric capital standards. HR 5461, the “Insurance Capital Standards Clarification Act of 2014 was passed by the House in a procedure called “suspension of the rules” which allows bills with have strong, bipartisan support to move quickly through the chamber (Best’s News Service, Sept. 17, 2014).

    The House bill followed a June vote in the Senate that saw the upper chamber unanimously pass standalone legislation that would clarify the Collins amendment.

    Both bills have garnered praise from insurance industry trade organizations, which have said clarity on the Collins amendment is urgently needed.

    Originally Posted at A.M. Best on October 1, 2014 by Jeff Jeffrey.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency