We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Insurers Should Keep A Wary Eye On E-Commerce Firms: BLOG

    October 14, 2014 by Linda Koco

    Should the traditional insurers fear non-insurance firms like e-commerce companies? The answer will interest agents, since the issue impacts them as well as their carriers.

    According to a June survey of 338 C-suite executives in the life and property-casualty insurance business, the answer is yes, they should. Researchers for the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) found that 32 percent of the group believes that insurers should fear non-insurance entities such as Google, Amazon and other e-commerce players.

    That is their No. 1 non-insurance threat right now, according to an EIU report sponsored by enterprise software firm SAP. Banks came in a very close second, at 31 percent.

    The runners-up were aggregators (14 percent) and large retailers (11 percent).

    The poll question cited firms such as confused​.com and Keystone as examples of aggregators. It didn’t provide an example of large retailers, but Wal-Mart surely fits the bill. (If you doubt that, take a look at Susan Rupe’s eye-opening INN blog post on Wal-Mart’s moves into health care. It is must reading.)

    News that banks are viewed as a threat may puzzle some readers. After all, life and annuity insurers have been nuzzling into that market, or trying to, for many years. They view it as a viable distribution channel. (And with good reason, at least on the annuity side. Bank annuity fee income hit a record $3.43 billion last year, according to the 2013 Michael White Bank Annuity Fee Income Report.)

    But distribution partnerships are not where the fear lives. The source of the fear is potential loss of control. And that’s where e-commerce firms and banks share billing.

    The EIU researchers pointed out that “insurers have struggled to keep pace with other industries with regard to consumer facing capabilities.” The upshot? “If customers make purchase decisions based on a customer experience that insurers struggled to deliver, then those customers may be up for grabs.”

    That could mean insurers may risk losing customers who traditionally bought insurance face-to-face with agents, they warned. Presumably, those customers would go to non-traditional insurers, via the direct route, leaving the traditional carriers and the agents in the dust.

    The barriers to entry to the insurance business are not as great now as they were in years past, observed Gary Scholten, whom the researchers quoted on the potential disruption. He is senior vice president and chief investment officer at Principal Financial Group.

    In today’s environment, new entrants to the business could form “alliances” and establish “digital connectivity” with insurers, he suggested. Or, he said, “The new entrants could acquire an insurer to serve as the manufacturer while the acquiring company handles the consumer-facing side.”

    My take: It is the last possibility — non-insurance entities with great consumer-facing systems and culture could acquire insurers — that may be fueling the fear detected in the survey. In the U.S., the industry has seen its share of not-altogether welcome “outsider” acquisitions. The private equity purchases of annuity carriers in recent years provide a case in point. But purchase by an e-commerce firm? That’s a much bigger leap. Bigger firms, bigger money, bigger technology models.

    That is not outside the realm of possibility. As Scholten noted, “It makes sense for disruption to happen in distribution first, followed by services and then — once consumers are in charge — product manufacture.”

    The old-fashioned approach to threat is to “meet fire with fire.” Maybe it’s time to revisit that notion, but with the “fire” being carrier adoption of consumer-centric approaches that have worked for successful e-commerce operations (and certain large retailers too). These approaches would be tailored to insurance, of course.

    Some carriers have already done this, according to EIU. But what about the rest? And what about running some ideas by the agents, who have a lot of skin in the game? If there is a strategy in place, maybe the fear-factor will subside.

     

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet Blog on October 14, 2014 by Linda Koco.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency