We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,225)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (420)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (803)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Are Americans Willing to Pay for Their Own Pension?

    November 14, 2014 by Gary Baker

    Each year, the Employee Benefits Research Institute (EBRI) publishes the results of its Retirement Confidence Survey. This annual survey tracks answers to some key questions over time, such as how confident Americans are about the prospects for Social Security and Medicare; how much money have they saved for their future and where are they putting their money; who they turn to for retirement investment information and advice; as well as why individuals are not saving more and what would motivate them to do so. These results, and how they change from year to year, offer interesting insights into investor attitudes, which often correlate to changes in the market and government programs.

    In an effort to drill further into attitudes about guarantees like Social Security and the deployment of retirement savings to support a lifetime in retirement, CANNEX has partnered with Greenwald & Associates to develop a new annual “Guaranteed Lifetime Income (GLI) Study.” The initial study has just been completed, and the results from more than 1,000 respondents reveal that retirees with investable assets greater than $100,000 depend on guaranteed lifetime income to cover a majority of their living expenses — 79% on average. In fact, more than 40% of those interviewed rely completely on guaranteed lifetime income sources and do not tap into their investments.

    The unfortunate reality for current and future retirees is that employer pensions are less common and the existing benefit levels maintained by Social Security are under attack. In Washington, cuts have been threatened and debated over a Social Security program that many predict won’t be solvent by 2033 in its current form. When they factor in the inevitable increases to Medicare costs that will shift more burden to retirees over time, it’s not surprising that so many Americans are concerned about funding their retirement.

    Clearly, if Americans expect to cover most of their retirement expenses with sources of guaranteed income, they are going to have to fund more of this from their own savings. And, the only true guaranteed source of lifetime income comes in the form of an annuity.

    The GLI Study measures how much consumers ages 55 to 75 value guaranteed lifetime income, their familiarity with the various annuity products available in the market today and how much they value what an annuity can provide given the commitment required to hold on to these products. Detailed results from each of these three components are then combined to derive a GLI Appeal Index that measures the likelihood of a consumer to own or consider the purchase of an annuity. In 2014, a mere 16 percent of consumers scored highly on the GLI Appeal Index.

    The initial 2014 GLI Study revealed some interesting results, including:

    • Seventy-eight percent of consumers consider the use of an annuity in addition to Social Security to be very valuable. Those who expressed the greatest appreciation for guaranteed lifetime income’s value include women, those with lower assets (less than $1 million), those who rely on others for investment decisions, and those who remember an advisor discussing annuities.
    • Few consumers understand how annuity products can be allocated to support their overall retirement portfolio. For example, providing the flexibility to increase their exposure to equities, or giving them greater opportunity to grow their other investments.
    • Most consumers don’t understand the differences between various types of annuities. Only three in 10 consumers said they are highly familiar with fixed annuities, compared to two-thirds of consumers who say they are highly familiar with mutual funds.

    Although traditional fixed annuities enjoy the most familiarity, from the table below, you can see that fixed indexed annuities (with or without a withdrawal benefit) rank lowest, along with immediate income annuities. So it’s really no surprise that mutual funds are by far the most familiar products among consumers.

     
     

    However, in one part of the survey, respondents were asked to evaluate the following series of four retirement income strategies for a 60 year old with $500,000 in assets who will be retiring in five years:

    1. Invest $100,000 in a deferred income annuity and $400,000 split between stock and bond mutual funds (with guaranteed annual payments of $7,800 starting at age 65).
    2. Invest $100,000 in a variable annuity with a guaranteed lifetime withdrawal benefit and $400,000 split between stock and bond mutual funds (with guaranteed annual payments of $6,000 starting at age 65).
    3. Invest $100,000 in a fixed indexed annuity with a guaranteed lifetime withdrawal benefit and $400,000 split between stock and bond mutual funds (with guaranteed annual payments of $6,500 starting at age 65).
    4. Invest all $500,000 in a mix of stock and bond mutual funds. There would be no guaranteed income, but income could be drawn from gains on the investments.

    As evidenced by the chart below, the investment-only strategy was the least appealing. The fixed indexed annuity with a guaranteed withdrawal benefit rated higher than the variable annuity strategy, largely due to the general competitive positioning of both products today. Interestingly, the deferred income annuity ranked third even though it provided the highest guaranteed payout.

    Overall, the GLI Study tracked a number of responses involving consumer concerns and goals in retirement, their attitudes about lifetime income and their use of annuities as a supplement to Social Security. Based on the results, it’s clear that consumers appreciate the benefits that annuities can deliver but don’t fully understand the variety of products available and could therefore benefit from more effective education and advice. This new annual study, along with a measurable index, should help raise awareness among consumers and help our industry devise more effective methods of presenting and supporting the allocation of annuity products for clients.

    The GLI Study was underwritten by Guardian Life, MassMutual Financial Group, MetLife, Pacific Life, Protective Life and Voya Financial. To obtain copies of supporting material for the GLI Study, visit http://cannex.com/usa/english/products_gli.htm or http://greenwaldresearch.com/health-wealth-blog

    Originally Posted at NAFA Annuity Outlook on November 2014 by Gary Baker.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency