We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Why ‘preferred’ FIAs can be bad for the industry: Opinion

    November 7, 2014 by Roccy DeFrancesco

    There is a disturbing trend in the industry right now. That trend is the creation of what I’ll call “preferred” fixed indexed annuities (FIAs).

    Preferred FIAs are different from what I call “proprietary” FIAs. Proprietary FIAs are products created for very specific IMOs (ones that are affiliated in some manner) to use. Proprietary products are usually tricked-up products that sound good but mathematically are inferior to many other products in the markets. IMOs push them, and agents sell them because the commissions are higher than other non-proprietary products.

    Preferred FIAs are ones that many different (non-affiliated) IMOs can use but come with certain restrictions — the main one being production requirements with different tiers of commissions.

    Why do companies roll out preferred products? To force loyalty and volume from the IMOs it works with.

    There is one out there in particular right now that I’m finding especially annoying. It’s a product that is somewhat confusing for the agent and the consumer to understand; and like a proprietary product, it has sales sizzle to it, so it’s pretty easy to sell (and it has high commissions).

    The issue is that, if IMOs want to sell this product, they must reach certain production requirements in order to get paid any kind of override. It’s really a bullying tactic by the insurance company.

    If the IMO or AFMO (GA or little IMO working under a bigger one) wants to sell a preferred product, it would have to put in $5 million in premium before getting paid any commissions. The insurance company doesn’t give back pay on the first $5 million in premiums placed by the IMO (it’s a bad deal for the IMO and a windfall to the insurance company).

    Then to get paid an extra .5 percent override, the IMO must reach $10 million in premiums.

    For the big IMOs, $10 million in premiums is not a big deal; but there are many little AFMOs trying to offer this product to agents, so the agents don’t leave them to go work with a competing IMO. Why should an insurance agent care about this article?

    Because it will affect the advice insurance agents receive from the IMO(s) they are working with. IMOs will be telling all their internal marketers to push the preferred product so they can: 1.) reach the minimum production requirements so they can start getting paid overrides; and 2.) try to get to the $10 million mark so they can reach the maximum override level.

    What is missing from this equation? The best interest of the client.

    I’ve had cases come across my desk where agents said they sold clients this relatively new preferred product; and after my review, it definitely would not have been the product I would recommend to the client. But that’s who the marketer at the IMO recommended as the “best” product. Shocking, eh?

    Do your own due diligence, and don’t just take the word of an IMO marketer!

    It’s vitally important for agents to learn the products in the market so they don’t have to blindly take the advice of a marketer at some IMO.

    Note: This article isn’t meant to say that all “preferred” products are terrible. That may not be the case. But many times, it may not be the “best” product for the client, and it is recommended anyway so the IMO can meet and keep meeting its annual production requirements.

    Originally Posted at ProducersWeb on November 7, 2014 by Roccy DeFrancesco.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency