We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Congress Bumps Bank Standards for Insurance Companies

    December 12, 2014 by Arthur D. Postal

    WASHINGTON – The House last night approved legislation that would clarify that the Federal Reserve Board can apply insurance-based capital standards, rather than bank-centric rules, to the insurance portion of any insurance holding company it oversees.

    The bill now heads to the president’s desk “where approval is widely expected,” said John M. Nadel, an analyst at Sterne, Agee & Leach in New York, in a flash investor’s note this morning.

    The legislation clarifies Sec. 171, the so-called “Collins amendment,” a provision of the Dodd-Frank Act. Congress acted after the Fed said its lawyers interpret the Collins amendment to “require” the Federal Reserve to apply bank capital rules to insurance companies it supervises.

    After six months of intrigue, drama and delay, the House ultimately followed the same script as the Senate in unanimously passing Senate bill S. 2270, “the Insurance Capital Standards Clarification Act of 2014.” The Senate had passed the amendment as a stand-alone bill June 3, hours after passing legislation that would reauthorize the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act.

    Nadel said the move was important because, “this as a critical step in the regulatory process as it provides the Fed ample room to maneuver in developing rules and regulations specifically tailored to the business models and risks of insurance companies, rather than applying broadly bank-centric standards.”

    However, as Nadel acknowledged, “the devil is in the details.”

    Steven A. Kandarian, chairman, president and CEO of MetLife, issued a statement lauding the decision.

    “Congress deserves tremendous credit for passing legislation with broad bipartisan support that will give the Federal Reserve the flexibility to tailor bank-centric capital rules for the life insurance business,” he said. “The Fed now has the opportunity to write rules that will preserve competition and ensure affordable access to financial security.”

    The next steps as Congress seeks to end another year of partisan bickering and get out of town is action on legislation that reauthorizes TRIA and re-establishes the National Association of Insurance Agents and Brokers (NARAB). That is likely to be followed, probably Dec. 18, by action from the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) on MetLife’s appeal of its designation as a systemically important financial institution (SIFI).

    MetLife sought an appeal of the FSOC’s decision in September, and a hearing was held in November.

    In his note, Nadel said that of the MetLife decision, “We expect no change in the vote (similar to the vote on Prudential Financial many months ago) and thus a formal and final designation of MetLife as a non-bank SIFI.” At the same time, Nadel said, “While there has been some speculation MetLife might avail itself of the last and somewhat drastic step of challenging the final ruling in court, we think the probability of such a decision on the part of MetLife’s executive management and board is extremely remote.”

    As to TRIA and NARAB, the House yesterday passed a slightly modified version of Senate Bill 2244, passed in June. But it contained baggage unacceptable to Democrats, leaving open the possibility that legislation reauthorizing TRIA and establishing NARAB could be delayed.

    The provision would prevent financial regulators from imposing margin and other requirements on farmers, ranchers and nonfinancial firms that engage in derivatives trading to protect them against setbacks in their businesses. Democrats in both the House and Senate object because it rolls back provisions in the Dodd-Frank Act (DFA) without the added scrutiny allowed through normal legislative procedures.

    An added complication was added this morning when Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., who negotiated the TRIA/NARAB deal with the House, disclosed that Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., plans to oppose Senate passage of the TRIA bill revised by the House yesterday and sent to the Senate. Coburn’s opposition was expected because he wants the NARAB provision “sunsetted,” that is, repealed, after two years. That would require Congress to re-pass legislation that it has debated for 14 years.

    “By playing games and refusing to pass a clean extension of terrorism insurance, the House Republicans have put terrorism insurance at risk,” Schumer said in a statement. “To ensure that terrorism insurance does not lapse, the House should pass the bipartisan bill that passed the Senate with 93 votes before they leave town today.”

    Democrats are also objecting to the continuing resolution needed to keep the government running because of concerns with a similar provision rolling back the DFA passed by the House yesterday. Current authorization to keep the government running ends at midnight tonight.

    The Collins amendment was sponsored by Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, as Congress acted to strengthen insurance supervision in the wake of the catastrophic failure of American International Group. AIG’s consolidated regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision, was cited as responsible for overseeing the holding company subsidiary of AIG that speculated in issuing credit default swaps that sent the company into turmoil. The CDS was issued through AIG’s Financial Products unit.

     

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet on December 11, 2014 by Arthur D. Postal.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency