We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • A.M. Best Affirms Ratings of Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company and Its Subsidiaries

    December 16, 2014 by Best's News Service

    Oldwick – A.M. Best has affirmed the financial strength rating of A+ (Superior) and the issuer credit ratings of “aa-” of Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company and its subsidiaries, United of Omaha Life Insurance Company, Companion Life Insurance Company (New York, NY) and United World Life Insurance Company. Concurrently, A.M. Best has affirmed the debt ratings of “a” on the group’s existing surplus notes. The outlook on all ratings is stable. The companies (collectively referred to as Mutual of Omaha) are located in Omaha, NE, unless otherwise specified.

    The rating affirmations reflect Mutual of Omaha’s diversified operating profile, strong balance sheet, well-recognized brand, established positions in several individual and group insurance products, varied distribution channels and good revenue and earnings growth in most of its core lines. Somewhat offsetting these positive rating factors are the company’s sizable books of Medicare supplement policies and, to a lesser extent, long-term-care (LTC) business, which expose the company to regulatory and/or market risks, including the ability to obtain rate increases. A.M. Best also notes Mutual of Omaha’s material exposure to commercial real estate in the general account (via mortgage loans) and through affiliated holdings, as well as its significant interest sensitive liabilities.

    In recent periods, Mutual of Omaha has reported solid GAAP and statutory operating earnings. Specifically, for its core Medicare supplement line of business, favorable benefit ratios are a result of disciplined pricing and the fact that medical cost trend is lower than historical levels. Also within the individual segment, the company reported growth in traditional life sales aided by its direct-to-consumer distribution strategy, as well as favorable mortality trends. Moreover, Mutual of Omaha has offered LTC policies for nearly three decades and has been profitable in recent years in part because of product design changes. A. M .Best notes that the company’s legacy business, written prior to 2004, has been subject to various rate increases in recent years, reflecting evolving assumptions related to claims experience.

    The company’s group benefits business has been supported by increased diversification of product offerings, including the introduction of several new voluntary products in recent years. Overall, the segment has generated revenue and earnings growth, driven by enhanced sales, disciplined underwriting and expense management. A.M. Best notes that Mutual of Omaha has recently reported some volatility within its group disability business and has taken corrective rate actions in its new and existing blocks to restore profitability in the near term. Additionally, the segment’s retirement plan business has reported good operating results despite the challenging low interest rate environment, which has hindered top-line growth within the annuity and retirement services product lines.

    Consistent with industry peers, Mutual of Omaha utilizes operating leverage to supplement earnings and to fund “redundant” reserves. A.M. Best views the company’s operating and financial leverage as manageable, with solid interest coverage supported by its diversified sources of cash flows. Additionally, the company issued $300 million of surplus notes in July and utilized some of the proceeds to retire (via tender offer) a portion of its outstanding notes with maturity dates in 2036 and 2040.

    A.M. Best notes that the organization has a somewhat higher all-in exposure to commercial real estate than some of its peers. This includes affiliate, East Campus Realty LLC (ECR), who oversees the Midtown Crossing at Turner Park property, as well as commercial loans with Mutual of Omaha Bank, potentially exposing the company to concentration risk. However, Mutual of Omaha has historically managed these assets prudently, and any volatility related to their performance has not resulted in deterioration of the company’s continued strong risk-adjusted capital position. Mutual of Omaha Bank has been a material contributor to the enterprise’s earnings in recent years. A.M. Best will continue to monitor the performance of the bank, as well as ECR for potential stresses on Mutual of Omaha’s operating results and capital levels.

    A.M. Best believes a positive rating action on Mutual of Omaha is unlikely in the near- to-medium term. Rating factors that may result in a negative rating action include deterioration in operating performance, a significant decline in risk-adjusted capital or an increase in the organization’s overall risk appetite through a higher proportion of sales of less creditworthy products or further investments in higher-risk non-insurance businesses.

    The following debt ratings have been affirmed with a stable outlook:

    Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company

    — “a” on $300 million 4.297% surplus notes, due 2054

    — “a” on $300 million 6.95% surplus notes, due 2040 (approximately $167 million outstanding)

    — “a” on $300 million 6.80% surplus notes, due 2036 (approximately $263 million outstanding)

    The methodology used in determining these ratings is Best’s Credit Rating Methodology, which provides a comprehensive explanation of A.M. Best’s rating process and contains the different rating criteria employed in the rating process. Best’s Credit Rating Methodology can be found at www.ambest.com/ratings/methodology.

    Key insurance criteria reports utilized:

     

    • A.M. Best’s Liquidity Model for U.S. Life Insurers

     

    • A.M. Best’s Perspective on Operating Leverage

     

    • Evaluating U.S. Surplus Notes

     

    • Rating Members of Insurance Groups

     

    • Risk Management and the Rating Process for Insurance Companies

     

    • Understanding BCAR for U.S. and Canadian Life/Health Insurers

     

     

    This press release relates to rating(s) that have been published on A.M. Best’s website. For all rating information relating to the release and pertinent disclosures, including details of the office responsible for issuing each of the individual ratings referenced in this release, please visit A.M. Best’s Ratings & Criteria Center.

     

    Originally Posted at A.M. Best on December 12, 2014 by Best's News Service.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency