We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Deal Reached On Proposed IUL Illustrations

    March 24, 2015 by Arthur D. Postal, arthur.postal@innfeedback.com

    WASHINGTON – Differing sectors of the industry have embraced new rules governing the illustrations to be used in selling indexed universal life insurance (IUL).

    The compromise is based on the proposal exposed for public comment by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ (NAIC) Life Actuarial (A) Task Force (LATF) on Feb. 19, and suggests only minor changes to the exposure draft.

    In general, the proposed illustrations include certain requirements of the Life Insurance Model Illustration Regulation. This was a key demand of a coalition of large insurers led by MetLife. The proposed illustrations also include supportability testing, which was supported by the New York Department of Financial Services.

    The coalition of insurers led by MetLife also includes Northwestern Mutual and New York Life.

    It is expected that the current proposal would result in crediting rates in the 6 to 7 percent range and put limits on loan leveraging.

    It is likely that the new rules will start going into effect this year, probably by Sept. 15, under a proposed phase-in plan suggested by the American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI).

    The deal was reached on the eve of NAIC’s spring meeting, scheduled for March 27 in Phoenix. The NAIC’s Life Actuarial (A) Task Force (LATF) already has scheduled a two-hour open meeting on the issue for the afternoon of March 26.

    Given the compromise has the support of a broad and diverse spectrum of companies, including both IUL and non-IUL writers, it could be acted upon by the full NAIC as early as the spring meeting.

    Under the proposed phase-in, provisions dealing with currently payable scale methodology, as well as the so-called “guardrail” that limits the expected yield that can be offered investors in IUL, will go into effect Sept. 15. Provisions detailing information on policy loans and establishing additional standards will go into effect for all new business and in-force life insurance illustrations on policies sold on or after March 1, 2016.

    An industry actuary who declined to be named said the core of the deal for the coalition headed by MetLife is the provisions that would go into effect Sept. 15, which are Secs. 4 and 5.

    “This is a critical component of the proposal as it represents the main control over the maximum illustrated rate,” the actuary said. More specifically, he said, the Life Insurance Illustrations Model Regulation stipulates that the illustrated scale must be the lesser of the currently payable scale and the disciplined current scale.

    The actuary explained that, for the currently payable scale (DCS), the LATF proposal uses a historical look-back approach that generally results in rates in the high 6’s (6.83 percent for a 0 percent floor/12 percent cap product).

    “While this rate is much higher than I would like, we believe that most companies’ illustrated rates will be capped at the disciplined current scale,” the actuary said.

    He said that for the DCS provision, the LATF proposal caps the investment return on options at 45 percent.

    “While this 45% is clearly much higher than I would like, there are some clear positives here,” he said, “because this guardrail, even when using a 45 percent maximum return, will provide a limit on illustrations.”

    The ACLI letter was sent to the LATF on March 16, the day the extended comment period closed.

    “No stakeholder will agree with every aspect of a true compromise, but LATF seems to have found a middle ground that can be embraced by a wide majority,” the ACLI letter said. It was signed by John Bruins, ACLI senior actuary.

    Bruins said that, “We note that this letter outlines the viewpoint shared by a significant majority of member companies on the points addressed, but there are companies with other viewpoints as well as items we did not address.”

    He added that while the Actuarial Guideline is specific to IUL, “we note that it addresses elements of IUL that may be present in other products.

    “To the extent such elements are analyzed, we believe it would be appropriate to consider a level playing field between products and companies,” Bruins said.

    Bruins noted that more work needs to be done before the illustrations rule is implemented.

    He noted that illustration regulations appropriately need to be in broad agreement with other regulations and illustration principles. They also need to be clear so as to be implemented consistently across companies with minimized opportunity for loopholes.

    “In this spirit, we hope LATF will work with industry actuaries to develop more specific technical language for the framework,” Bruins said.

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet on March 20, 2015 by Arthur D. Postal, arthur.postal@innfeedback.com.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency