We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (15,832)
  • Industry Conferences (3)
  • Industry Job Openings (9)
  • Negative Media (135)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (586)
  • Sheryl's Blogs (166)
  • Wink's Articles (222)
  • Wink's Blogs (208)
  • Wink's Press Releases (92)
  • Blog Archives

  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • US Insurance Groups Frustrated Over Lack of Access to ICS Talks, IAIS Response to Input

    March 30, 2015 by Thomas Harman, associate editor, BestWeek: Tom.Harman@ambest.com

    PHOENIX – U.S. insurers can voice their opinions to the International Association of Insurance Supervisors about its international capital standards proposal, but they appear to be frustrated over the issue of access to IAIS talks and a lack of response to suggestions.

    Questions about access and quality of discussions with stakeholders came up during the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ Spring National Meeting on March 28. The IAIS issued its ICS last fall, setting a 2016 deadline to finalize the document and a 2018 adoption date.

    The IAIS also issued a policy that took effect Jan. 1 that allows stakeholders to attend meetings where regulations are being negotiated only when necessary in order to provide comment on specific issues (Best’s News Service, Nov. 16, 2014). In January, it adopted a policy for consultation of stakeholders stating that “at least once a year, the Executive Committee shall invite stakeholders to an open dialogue to discuss relevant substantive issues.”

    IAIS Deputy Secretary General George Brady III told a heavily attended session of the NAIC’s International Relations Committee that comments can be made during a series of stakeholder meetings throughout the remainder of the year. Those meetings are scheduled for May 6 in New York; May 12 in Tokyo, Aug. 4 in Basel, Switzerland and Oct. 5, also in Basel. He said there would be two days of open meetings June 18-19 in Macao, China, that mark a good chance for stakeholder dialogue with the IAIS Executive Committee.

    Brady told Best’s News Service that some negotiators want to bring what he described as “fundamental questions” to the Executive Committee, questions that are more properly addressed at IAIS committee meetings. He said the IAIS prefers to keep “big picture” issues for the Executive Committee.

    U.S. industry and regulators have repeatedly voiced frustration about transparency and the ability to gain access to discussions.

    Dave Snyder, vice president of international policy at the Property Casualty Insurers’ Association of America, told the panel that the IAIS process “gives the appearance of transparency without transparency.” He said that any final IAIS product without true transparency would be inferior and urged IAIS to review its procedures and to reconsider its meetings rules.

    He told Best’s News Service that unlike NAIC, interested parties are barred from work sessions and are only permitted in if they are invited in as guest experts. Interested parties are only guaranteed input at the beginning of a work stream and at the end when there is a formal consultation. The latter case, he said, is often meaningless, because decisions are usually made at that point. Before the new meeting restrictions took effect, industry and consumers could attend working meetings and contribute to the debate, which Snyder said resulted in balanced products.

    Closed meetings rules, Snyder said, potentially result in less workable products and even opposition when they are to be implemented in the U.S., because of the limited input during development.

    Michelle Rogers, director of financial and regulatory policy at the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies, told Best’s News Service said there appears to be little action by IAIS after stakeholders provide their points of view. “The amount of time provided to stakeholders for interaction is adequate, but the stakeholder meetings do not result in a problem-solving interaction between the IAIS committees and the stakeholders,” Rogers said. “They tend to be just an information exchange.”

    Rogers said that while she does not feel ignored, “I don’t feel as though the issues we are raising are being answered or incorporated into the ICS dialogue, except through the U.S. regulators involved in the IAIS committees.”

    While some U.S. industry and regulators hinted of indications that the IAIS might push back its time lines for ICS implementation, Brady told Best’s News Service that IAIS was “keeping the time line.”

    Originally Posted at A.M. Best on March 30, 2015 by Thomas Harman, associate editor, BestWeek: Tom.Harman@ambest.com.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency