We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Consumer Group Rejects IUL Proposal

    May 12, 2015 by Arthur D. Postal, arthur.postal@innfeedback.com

    WASHINGTON — On what was supposed to be the eve of a key vote, consumer representatives of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) have asked the panel to go back to the drawing board in its year-long effort to craft new rules on indexed universal life (IUL) insurance illustrations.

    The comments of the eight consumer representatives were filed Monday. The comments surrounded the Life Insurance and Annuities (A) Committee’s plan to discuss and adopt the current proposal, which originally was scheduled for a conference call Wednesday. However, the committee announced late Tuesday that the call is cancelled.

    Under that proposal, agents would be allowed to show potential customers a document that supported crediting rates in the 6-to-7-percent range, although so-called “guardrails” mandated by the proposal could limit actual likely yields to as low as 4.5 percent.

    Committee passage would be the next to final step in the long process of implementing the rule. The final step will be passage by the full NAIC, something that had been expected to occur by the middle of June.

    Originally, the plan had been for the committee to approve the proposal Wednesday, with phase-in scheduled to begin Sept. 1 and the process completed by March 1, 2016.

    Representatives of such firms as MetLife, Northwestern Mutual, New York Life and Pacific Life as well as the American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI) have spent the past months working with regulators on a compromise proposal.

    An ACLI spokesman said today that the trade group would defer comment on the consumer group comment letter until after the A Committee vote Wednesday.

    The consumer representatives’ letter suggested that one issue that should be considered as part of a new rule is guidance for illustration of long-term care (LTC) benefits and costs in an IUL or other life insurance policy that provides LTC benefits.

    The consumer representatives argued that the guideline adopted April 16 by the Life Actuarial (A) Task Force (LATF) does not address key failures of current illustrations, that is, understate the gross return of the index investment and overstate the net returns of the IUL investments.

    The letter acknowledged that the LATF actuaries identified a key problem with current illustrations, which is the use of unrealistic index returns.

    But, the letter continued, the proposal’s plan to address only some of the problems on an interim basis “will lead to a failure to address remaining problems and/or frequent changes in regulatory requirements leading to confusion among regulators, insurers and consumers.”

    Exacerbating the problem, the letter states, is the different implementation dates of separate provisions of the interim guidance. In addition, the letter-writers objected to part of the proposal that would require applying the new requirements only to policies sold after the implementation date, as opposed to policies in force after the implementation date.

    The consumer representatives want the A Committee to have the LATF develop guidance for three illustration scales for IUL products.

    The factors that they the rule to be redrafted to illustrate the gross return of the index, meaning the actual historical total return of the index; the net return of the index, meaning the historical amount that would have been credited to the policyholder’s investment account net of all investment-related charges; and the guaranteed returns to the policyholder, net of all investment-related charges.

    The consumer group comment letter also asked that the new proposal require the new guidance to be applied to policies in force on or after an effective date. In addition, the group requested that experts in consumer information and disclosure play a role in developing the new illustrations rule.

    Under the proposed phase-in to be voted on by the A Committee, provisions dealing with currently payable scale methodology as well as the so-called “guardrail” that limits the expected yield that can be illustrated for potential customers of an IUL will go into effect Sept. 1.

    Provisions detailing information on policy loans and establishing additional standards will go into effect for all new business and in-force life insurance illustrations on policies sold on or after March 1, 2016.

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet on May 12, 2015 by Arthur D. Postal, arthur.postal@innfeedback.com.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency