We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • To sell more permanent coverage, stop selling death insurance

    May 27, 2015 by Marlin Bollinger

    Over the past decade or so, life insurance agents have sold a greater percentage of term insurance as compared to permanent coverage. We are all aware of the transition from needs analysis selling to transactional order taking. Although we look at ourselves as professionals, many independent agents will have to admit they too have fallen into this transactional mode, selling blocks of 10- and 20-year term insurance as if prepackaged in $250,000, $500,000 and $1,000,000 units.

    To make such a broad generalization really isn’t fair to those advisors who do take time to provide a total needs analysis for their clients. But, as advisors, we are constantly bombarded with new and different versions of the latest permanent products. It becomes difficult for us to properly analyze and evaluate the benefits of these respective contracts, let alone recommend them to our clients.

    It’s no wonder that today’s consumer doesn’t understand the permanent products we sell; nor do they understand the multiple uses of the modern permanent insurance policy. So, they just purchase our recommended term coverage.

    I assume most consumers have heard that the death benefit from most life insurance contracts can be received income tax free. That hasn’t changed over the years. Other than that, a lot has changed in today’s all-in-one policies, particularly when it comes to providing benefits while the insured is still alive. We finally have a reason to call it life insurance, although many of us are still selling death insurance.

    I host an ongoing group of insurance company RVPs, touting just how superior their IUL, whole life, GUL, or current assumption portfolio is compared to the competition. That’s their job and they do it well, showing us their competitive features and key marketing cells.

    That’s when my staff and I buckle down to the tedious task of digging as deep into these contracts as possible to make a reasonable determination of their use and value in the marketplace. Here’s my point. Let’s stop selling death insurance and start promoting the unique benefits of life insurance. No matter how deep we dig, there are still only three components of a life insurance policy: mortality, interest, and expenses.

    So, all these IUL and all other projected cash value illustrations are only that, illustrations. Everyone’s IUL look back differs from the next, although the numbers over the years are the same. Whole life cash values are guaranteed, but the dividend projections fall into the same boat as the IUL projected rates and current assumption rates.

    One thing we know for sure is that the projected cash values somewhere down the road on these policies are only projections and not real. These values are going to be higher or lower, dependent upon an uncertain economic future. That’s why we are hesitant to project an income stream from these products, although many agents like to show them. If we do show an income stream, we recommend projecting at a responsible interest rate (6 percent) and projecting the income based upon the guaranteed loan rates in the contract, not creating a positive arbitrage from a variable non-guaranteed rate.

    With pending regulatory legislation right around the corner, it is prudent, and consumer-oriented, to take an illustrative approach that tends to err on the conservative side of things. We’ve got an incredible arsenal of products, designed to solve the human asset and future financial risks for our clients. These unique products with living benefits are truly deserving of being called life insurance. No other profession has the opportunity to positively affect the lives of millions of Americans.

    Today’s permanent life insurance products are the most flexible, consumer-centric contracts we have ever offered.

    So, now we need to beg the question: Why do less American families (percentage-wise) own permanent life insurance than in previous decades? Here’s what we know. Less than half of middle market consumers, ages 25 to 64, have individual life insurance coverage. Forty-four percent of those without life coverage say they need it.1

    Many consumers struggle with different elements of the decision process when shopping for life insurance. Forty-four percent of consumers are most concerned with determining whether they are getting their money’s worth. They also find understanding the policy details and knowing how much coverage to buy challenging. A large portion of people procrastinate when it comes to shopping for life insurance, not knowing what kind of life insurance they should buy or, as we stated, how much coverage they need. Only about one-third of adults have someone they consider their agent or financial advisor who could help them determine what they need. Research shows an advisor’s ability to educate, listen, and develop trust are the qualities most desired by consumers.1

    In order to increase our permanent life sales, we must be prepared to engage the millions of potential clients waiting for someone to answer the questions posed above. Before we embark on this campaign, we must feel confident that we fully understand how our contemporary portfolio of permanent products can solve the issues our clients face in each phase of their lives.

    I am sometimes shocked and surprised that many agents do not understand the structure of the permanent products we market. For example, Agent Smith has never sold a whole life policy and does not understand the difference between participating and non-participating contracts, never mind all the dividend options of a participating contract. He is somewhat foggy when it comes to shadow accounts and index crediting. From this example, you can see why Agent Smith may be a bit hesitant to discuss the virtues of permanent coverage with his clients.

    Even those of us who think we understand the myriad of permanent products in the marketplace can use a refresher on how to position and sell the most current permanent products.

    Most IMOs offer ongoing product training and consultation to bring you up to speed on the latest and greatest they have to offer.

    Together, we can embark on a campaign to expose potential clients to the products and services they truly deserve from the life insurance industry. Good luck and good selling.

    1LIMRA Life Insurance Consumer Studies 2014

    Originally Posted at ProducersWeb on May 27, 2015 by Marlin Bollinger.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency