We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Labor Chief Signals Changes to Fiduciary Proposal

    June 25, 2015 by Arthur Postal

    The Labor Department is considering changing some aspects of exemptions in its proposed fiduciary standard expansion, the department’s secretary said on Tuesday.

    The department is focusing on additional data retention and point of sale disclosure requirements in the best interest contract exemption because of comments on the rule, Secretary Thomas E. Perez said during a Brookings Institution event in Washington, D.C.

    “The reason those comments are so important is because they’ve already begun to sharpen our thinking about whether we should make changes to the exemption,” Perez said. “So that the proposal accomplishes its goals in the simplest, least burdensome way for all concerned,” Perez said during a policy forum on promoting financial well-being in retirement. 

    Perez also disclosed that a public hearing on the proposal will take place during the week of Aug. 10, after which the comment period will re-open for two weeks once the hearing transcript is published. The initial comment period, extended to a total of 140 days recently, will be July 21.

    His comments implying that the agency is taking a hard look on additional data retention and point of sale disclosure provisions of the proposed rule mirror criticism voiced by National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisers (NAIFA) in a survey released today.

    The new rule would require sellers (broker dealers, insurance companies, banks) to hold copious amounts of records on purchases, sales, costs of investments for six years.

    Perez acknowledged that some commenters supported the two provisions, but implied that he would like to hear more opinions about them.

    “The more voices that are heard — the more open, inclusive and transparent the process — the stronger the new rule will be at the end of the day,” Perez said.

    In his comments, Perez acknowledged that the proposal has detractors in the financial industry, citing Bank of America and its Merrill Lynch Management securities unit, as well as some mutual fund houses. But he also noted that companies that serve small investors through the use of technology reject ideas that small savers will be unable to get substantive investment advice through the rule.

    “When I talk to firms like these and tell them about the argument on the other side — that our rulemaking will make it impossible to serve the small saver — they say: ‘Give those small savers my email address’,” Perez said. “The bottom line is that this is a multitrillion dollar market; there’s just no way industry will walk away from it.”

    Moreover, Perez said, “I believe, in fact, that the new rule will be a catalyst for further innovation in the industry, as more firms devise new tools and strategies — assisted by modern software and new technology-based tools — to accommodate even those with only a few thousand dollars to invest.”

    Perez said he recognized the huge problems associated with major reforms in delivery of financial firms imposed by Great Britain.

    “The experience with a similar proposal in the United Kingdom can be instructive here,” he said. “Their proposal was a lot more stringent — new standards and qualification requirements, as well as a ban on commissions.”

    Perez said one problem with the UK rule is that advisors had to reexamine their business models, “which, like ours, far too often had misaligned incentives. But in both countries, we know that the market can respond to these initiatives with new, innovative, and low cost ways to provide advice.”

    Perez said the department’s proposal does not include detailed rules on what advisers can and cannot do to serve their client.

    “While it is undergirded by the unassailable principle that retirement advisers should make their clients’ best interests paramount, we leave a lot of room within that framework for industry to figure things out,” Perez said. “There is no one-size-fits-all template for serving clients’ best interests. Our intent here is to provide guard rails, not to put anyone in a straitjacket.”

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet on June 23, 2015 by Arthur Postal.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency