We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (17,756)
  • Industry Conferences (3)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (204)
  • Negative Media (139)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (656)
  • Wink's Articles (265)
  • Wink's Inside Story (238)
  • Wink's Press Releases (99)
  • Blog Archives

  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • These 13 countries have better retirement systems than America

    December 23, 2015 by Emily Zulz

    The United States has continued its decline among countries’ retirement income systems ranked in the Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index.

    Mercer released the results of its 2015 index, which encompasses 25 countries with pension systems at varying stages of maturity – some systems are well established while others, particularly in the Asia, are still developing.

    “The U.S. retirement system continues to rank in the middle of the pack,” Emily Eaton, a senior consultant in Mercer’s International Consulting Group, said in a statement. “Concerns over the adequacy of the typical level of benefits provided under the U.S. system contribute to our lackluster score.”

    Mercer gives several suggestions on how the U.S. can improve its retirement savings system.

    “The lack of employer-provided supplemental retirement benefits for many Americans, and the relatively low labor force participation rates of our older workers, are also contributing factors to the U.S. ranking,” Eaton said in a statement. “There have been a series of regulatory changes to address these issues, but additional action could improve the adequacy and sustainability of the U.S. system.”

    Mercer recommends additional action — such as raising the minimum pension for low-income retirees, adjusting the level of mandatory contributions to increase the net replacement for median-income earners, reducing preretirement leakage by further limiting the access to funds before retirement, and introducing a requirement that part of the retirement benefit must be taken as an income stream — i.e., an annuity.

    “The recent efforts, at both the state and national level, to introduce auto-enrollment and/or state-run individual retirement accounts, is an encouraging step in the right direction,” Eaton added. “However, these are the first, small steps in improving retirement adequacy for the majority of Americans.”

    In order to rank the retirement systems across the globe, the Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index objectively evaluates both the publicly funded and private components of a system as well as personal assets and savings outside the pension system.

    It measures the 25 retirement income systems against more than 50 indicators under the sub-indexes of adequacy, sustainability and integrity. From there, it gives each country a letter grade based on the country’s score – creating a global scorecard for retirement savings.

    Here’s what Mercer had to say about the U.S. retirement system and the 13 countries that outranked it:

    14. USA

    Grade: C

    The U.S. slipped from 13th place in 2014 to 14th in the 2015 index. According to the index, this drop reflects a continuation from the 2013 ranking, where the U.S. placed 11th.

    Mercer describes the United States’ retirement income system as “a social security system with a progressive benefit formula based on lifetime earnings, adjusted to a current dollar basis, together with a means-tested top-up benefit; and voluntary private pensions, which may be occupational or personal.”

     

    13. France

    Grade: C

    France’s retirement income system involves an earnings-related public pension with a minimum pension level, two mandatory occupational pension plans for blue and white collar workers respectively, and voluntary occupational plans.

    12. Germany

    Grade: C+

    Mercer describes Germany’s retirement income system as “an earnings related pay-as-you-go system based on the number of pension points earned during an individual’s career; a means-tested safety net for low-income pensioners; and supplementary pension plans which are common amongst major employers.”

    According to Mercer, these plans typically either adopt a book reserving approach, with or without segregated assets, or an insured pensions approach.

     

    11. Ireland

    Grade: C+

    Ireland’s retirement income system involves a flat-rate basic scheme and a means-tested top-up. According to Mercer, voluntary occupational pension schemes have limited coverage.

    10. Singapore

    Grade: C+

    Singapore’s retirement income system is based on the Central Provident Fund (CPF), which covers all employed Singaporean residents.

    “Under the CPF, some benefits are available to be withdrawn at any time for specified housing and medical expenses with other benefits preserved for retirement,” according to Mercer. “A prescribed minimum amount is required to be drawn down at retirement age in the form of a lifetime income stream.”

    According to Mercer, the Singapore government announced upcoming changes to CPF for 2016 – such as providing minimum pension top-up amounts for the poorest individuals, more flexibility in drawing down retirement pension amounts and increases to certain contribution rates and interest guarantees.

     

    9. UK

    Grade: B

    The United Kingdom’s retirement income system involves a flat-rate public pension supported by an income-tested pension credit; an earnings-related pension based on revalued average lifetime salary; and voluntary private pensions, which may be occupational or personal.

    “From 2016 the state flat-rate and earnings-related pension components will be replaced with a single tier state pension,” according to Mercer. “Auto enrolment is currently being phased in, requiring employers to enroll employees in pension schemes with minimum contributions (increasing to 8 percent in 2018), with the facility for employees to opt out.”

    8. Chile

    Grade: B

    According to Mercer, Chile’s retirement income system involves means-tested social assistance; a mandatory privately managed defined contribution system based on employee contributions with individual accounts managed by a small number of “Administradoras de Fondos de Pensiones”; and a framework for supplementary plans sponsored by employers.

     

    7. Canada

    Grade: B

    Canada’s retirement income system consists of a universal flat-rate pension, supported by a means-tested income supplement; an earnings-related pension based on revalued lifetime earnings; voluntary occupational pension schemes (many of which are defined benefit schemes); and voluntary individual retirement savings plans.

    6. Finland

    Grade: B

    Finland’s retirement income system uses an income-tested basic state pension and a range of statutory earnings-related schemes, according to Mercer.

     

    5. Switzerland

    Grade: B

    Mercer describes Switzerland’s retirement income system as “an earnings-related public pension with a minimum pension; a mandatory occupational pension system where the contribution rates increase with age; and voluntary pension plans which are offered by insurance companies and [authorized] banking foundations.”

    4. Sweden

    Grade: B

    Sweden’s retirement income system was reformed in 1999. The new system is an earnings-related system with notional accounts, according to Mercer.

    “The overall system is in transition from a pay-as-you-go system to a funded approach,” according to Mercer. “There is also an income-tested top-up benefit which provides a minimum guaranteed pension.”

     

    3. Australia

    Grade: B+

    Mercer describes Australia’s retirement income system as a “means-tested age pension (paid from general government revenue); a mandatory employer contribution paid into private sector arrangements (mainly DC plans); and additional voluntary contributions from employers, employees or the self-employed paid into these private sector plans.”

    2. Netherlands

    Grade: A

    The Netherlands’ retirement income system involves a flat-rate public pension and a quasi-mandatory earnings-related occupational pension linked to industrial agreements.

    Most employees belong to these occupational schemes which are industry-wide defined benefit plans with the earnings measure based on lifetime average earnings, according to Mercer.

     

    1. Denmark

    Grade: A

    Denmark holds onto the No. 1 position for the fourth year running. According to Mercer, the primary reasons for Denmark’s top spot include its well-funded pension system with its good coverage, high level of assets and contributions, the provision of adequate benefits and a private pension system with developed regulations.

    Here are the rest of the countries Mercer ranked:

    15. Poland: C

    16. South Africa: C

    17. Brazil: C

    18. Austria: C

    19. Mexico: C

    20. Italy: C

    21. Indonesia: D

    22. China: D

    23. Japan: D

    24. South Korea: D

    25. India: D

    Originally posted on ThinkAdvisor.com

    Originally Posted at ProducersWEb on December 22, 2015 by Emily Zulz.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency