We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Annuity perks: Don’t say you weren’t “Warrened”! :BLOG

    January 11, 2016 by Steven McCarty

    Have you been following U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren’sinvestigation into the non-cash perks life insurance agents earn on their annuity sales?

    Her efforts have sparked political debate, which I won’t go into here. But I would like to ponder the ethical implications of her charges.

    Ready?

    First, Warren believes “annuity agents that (sic) are more interested in earning perks than in acting in their clients’ best interest can place Americans’ savings and retirement security at risk.” She sees cruises, trips to glamorous foreign cities, and diamond-encrusted Super Bowl-style rings as conflicts of interest that can lead to unsuitable sales.

    She wonders why the insurance industry hasn’t banned such perks even through NASD (now FINRA) did so in 2003. And she views companies giving motorcycles and exotic cars to their top producers as wrong, period. So does Senator Warren have a point? I think most reasonable people would agree non-cash perks can, in theory, pose ethical challenges at times. Getting paid extra to recommend specific products can:

    • Distort your professional judgment, leading you to recommend unsuitable products in order to qualify for incentives.
    • Tempt you to “gang production” with one carrier or FMO in order to meet qualification thresholds, again leading to questionable decisions.
    • Get you and your spouse addicted to nice trips and prizes that distort your objectivity.
    • Convince you to remain with an FMO even though their products, service or compliance advice may be suspect.
    • Put you at a marketing disadvantage with fiduciary-standard financial planners and investment advisors who may have sworn off perks.

    Most agents know these issues and manage them effectively. A minority ignore them, serving their own financial interests, not those of the client. And it’s these latter agents who produce the egregious violations we read about every day — and that attract regulatory scrutiny that boostcompliance costs for everyone.

    In fact, a spate of recent regulatory initiatives constitutes a sea change in how government (and ultimately consumers) are viewing conflicts of interest. If you ignore these warnings, don’t be surprised if regulators place a heavy hand on your shoulder quite soon.

    Having said this, I don’t agree with eliminating annuity perks entirely. That’s because they serve legitimate purposes. They drive sales and profits for insurers, making them financially stronger and giving consumers greater peace of mind. This also benefits shareholders and the economy at large. In addition, perks motivate advisors to assist consumers with their retirement-income needs, something our country sorely needs.

    In my personal sales experience, I didn’t have ethical issues accepting perks because I just didn’t let them cloud my judgment. Regarding conferences, my trip eligibility was always contingent on overall volume, not on sales of specific products or product types. And I found the events to be rich with educational content and opportunities to learn informally from the best of the best. I always came away from these experiences refreshed, ready to work and ready to be a better advisor. And, of course, I had a great time (which I worked hard for).

    But that’s just me. Where do you stand?

    • Should you reconsider the non-cash perks you accept?
    • Should you position yourself as an advisor who stands above the conflicted herd?
    • Is it time to swear off pure cash or merchandise rewards that don’t make you a better advisor?
    • And should you begin disclosing your non-cash sales incentivesdespite having no legal requirement to do so?

    Now’s the time to consider these questions before others answer them for you. This will help you to avoid errors-and-omissions insurance claims when clients get mad at you for recommending unsuitable products to receive perks. Don’t say you haven’t been “Warrened”!

    Originally Posted at ProducersWeb on January 8, 2016 by Steven McCarty.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency