We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Sales Surge for FIAs, but Income Riders Pose Risks

    January 22, 2016 by Linda Koco

    As fixed indexed annuity (FIA) sales continue their meteoric rise, their risk profile has been increasing as well, according to an FIA market report from Fitch Ratings. 
     
    The guaranteed income rider is a key factor in this trend. Ever since these riders debuted in 2006, they have been contributing to FIAs’ sales growth as well as to their risk profile increase, Fitch said.
     
    About those sales: Between 2007 and 2014, FIA sales rose by 93 percent, the analysts said, citing figures from LIMRA Secure Retirement Institute (LIMRA SRI). By comparison, sales of other fixed annuities declined by 1 percent in the same period, and sales of variable annuities declined by 24 percent.  
     
    Along the way, FIAs grabbed market share too. During the first six months of 2015, FIA sales represented 21 percent of all annuity sales, up from 10 percent in 2007, Fitch said. 
     
    Several factors contributed to this growth, the analysts noted. These include the low interest rate environment; the expansion of distribution into bank, broker/dealer and wire house channels; and insurers’ declining appetite for the risks associated with selling variable annuities (VAs). 
    But income riders were “one of the main drivers,” the analysts said. The features also have become extremely popular. When the riders are available, for example, consumers elected them for 68 percent of annuity contract purchases, the Fitch researchers said, citing LIMRA SRI figures.
     
    Sales-Surge-for-FIAs-chart.jpg

    A NEW VIEW

    This growth in income riders has not been without side effects. For instance, their incorporation in FIA products has increased the carriers’ “exposure to tail risk,” Fitch said.
     
    In addition, according to the report, the riders have added asset-liability management challenges for carriers due to the riders’ impact on both the “duration and convexity of liability.” 
     
    And since use of riders is a relatively new trend, not yet a decade old, “there is limited long-term industry experience around policyholder behavior,” the researchers said. 
     
    They went on to report the riders’ relative newness means it is unclear how contract holders will behave in a rapidly increasing interest rate scenario or a significant equity market downturn. This is of particular concern since surrender charge periods have become shorter.
     
    Fitch’s report paints a much different picture of the FIA business than the researchers described in the pre-rider days. 
     
    Back then, Fitch viewed the FIA business as being less exposed to interest rate risk than traditional declared rate annuities, the analysts said. The FIAs’ more modest base policy guarantees contributed to that assessment. So did the FIAs’ greater surrender charge protection and their use of market value adjustment features, they said.
     
    Also, the more stable profit margins historically associated with the FIA business as compared with those of traditional fixed annuities spoke to a less risk-prone assessment. The analysts attributed this characteristic to FIAs’ greater crediting rate flexibility as compared with that of traditional fixed annuities. 

    OTHER RISKS

    Risk in the products is appearing from other trends too. For example, the Department of Labor’s (DOL) proposed fiduciary rule, now awaiting release in its final form, is a looming factor.
     
    The proposed rule does not require FIAs to undergo the same compliance procedures and fiduciary contract that VAs do, the analysts allowed. However, “FIAs sold within a tax-qualified retirement plan (including individual retirement accounts) would be subjected to the new impartial conduct standards,” they said.
     
    Those standards “specify that advisors must provide advice that is in the client’s best interest and not recommend assets that pay advisors what the DOL called ‘unreasonable compensation.’” 
     
    The risk is that the new standards could impact commission rates, product design and FIA sales growth, Fitch said. 
     
    The entry of private equity players into the FIA market presents another risk. The trend began a few years ago, and as of June 30, four of the 10 largest FIA writers, based on sales, were owned by private equity firms, Fitch said. 
     
    This “wave” of new entrants has caught the attention of regulators and spurred more stringent oversight, the analysts noted.
     
    As Fitch sees it, the risk here has to do with the firms’ overall business objectives.
     
    “These firms believe that through their investment management and deal-structuring capabilities, they will achieve higher returns in this business than traditional life insurance companies,” the analysts wrote. “However, Fitch believes these private equity firms are increasing investment risk in the search for additional yield.”
     
    Still another risk the analysts spotlighted is the increased complexity of FIA products. Although this gives policyholders more flexibility in choices, “whether FIA carriers have the proper risk control measures in place to handle the complexity is still largely untested,” the analysts said.

    THE SCENT OF RISK

    The press copy of the Fitch report does not quantify the level of risk that Fitch has detected in the FIA market. However, in the annuity business, if there is even the whiff of rising risk, that can put product availability, richness and pricing into play. 
     
    Based on the report, the scent of risk is already in the air. For annuity professionals, including those in other annuity lines as well as in FIAs, that means it’s time to watch for risk-based shifts in the FIA market. 
     

    Linda Koco, MBA, is a contributing editor to InsuranceNewsNet, specializing in life insurance, annuities and income planning. Linda can be reached at linda.koco@innfeedback.com linda.koco@innfeedback.com.

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet Magazine on January 2016 by Linda Koco.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency