We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,225)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (420)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (803)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • All volatility-controlled indices are NOT created equal

    February 10, 2016 by Daniel W. McDonald

    As index annuities gain popularity, competition for market share is fierce, and volatility-controlled indices have become an industry standard — but how do they actually work? All volatility-controlled indices are, in fact, not created equal to highlight the difference of each index and not to prove if one index is better or worse than another (that’s for you to decide). Below is an objective overview of volatility-controlled indices in general, carrier specific offerings and how they came into existence.

    How does a volatility-controlled index actually work?

    Each volatility risk controlled index is linked to an underlying volatility index. A key difference is the inclusion of a percentage number (usually 5 percent, 7 percent, or 10 percent). The higher the percentage numbers the higher the allowed level of volatility, which offers greater upside and downside potential. Each volatility index is comprised of individual stocks or entire broader indexes typically rebalancing allocations monthly and adjusts exposure to the underlying index daily. Depending on the construction of the index’s algorithm certain levels of volatility will increase or decrease an allocation from one internal index to another or alter the exposure percentage of the overall volatility-controlled index. Specific underlying and risk controlled volatility indexes will be explained later.

    How does a spread work and how are they applied?

    In the world of volatility controls linked to uncapped strategies we almost assuredly will talk about spreads. Please note that spreads are not fees as they only apply to gains and will not diminish principal or account value as a fee would. Below is an example using a 3 percent spread.

    • (16% index gain) – (3% spread) = 13% credited to account
    • (2% index gain) – (3% spread)= 0% credited to account
    • (-8% index loss) – (3% spread)= 0% credited to account

    How large the spread is and how high it can go once the contract is issued is important to know?

    As indicated in the title, all volatility controls are not created equal, which is not only true with how the actual index is constructed, but also how the spread works. For example, Genworth’s strategy is a 2-year point-to-point with a current spread of 1.65 percent applied annually and can be increased to 6 percent. Whereas, Eagle Life’s spread is 1 percent and can increase to 10 percent, and Forethought’s spread is 6 percent, can be increased to 15 percent and applied tri-annually.

    Editor’s note: After this article was written, Genworth announced their suspension of traditional life coverage and fixed annuity products. Read more on our sister site, LifeHealthPro.com.

    Do you know what you’re selling?

    Below are five of the industry’s most popular index annuity companies and their respective volatility-controlled, uncapped strategies. Knowing how they work and how they’ve performed in decreasing/increasing markets and interest rate environments is vital to advisor and wholesaler credibility alike. The numbers below can be publicly viewed using the link provided for each strategy and the descriptions of the index are provided by each company on their website or in approved client material. Carriers and indexes are listed in order based on 5-Year Annualized Return after current spread.

    Genworth

    Index Name: Barclays US Low Volatility II ER Risk Controlled Index7% (Ticker: BXIILVU7)

    Indicies Used: NYSE & NASDAQ

    • 2013 Total Return: 20.04%
    • 2015 Total Return: -0.31%
    • 5-Year Annualized Return: 7.52%

    The Barclays US Low Volatility II ER Risk Controlled Index 7% is a volatility controlled index that tracks a basket of 50 of the lowest volatility stocks on the NYSE and NASDAQ. Stocks must also have a market cap of $5 billion and have a three-month average daily traded value of $50 million or greater to qualify. On a daily basis, the index increases or decreases the exposure to the basket of stocks in order to target a 7 percent volatility level. The basket of stocks is rebalanced monthly and consists of 50 of the lowest volatility stocks from the past 12 months. This index is a two-year point-to-point and a monthly fact sheet is available for this index.

    Eagle Life

    Index Name: S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Daily Risk Control 5% Index (Ticker: SPXD5UN)

    Indices Used: S&P 500 Dividend Paying

    • Stocks & Cash Component
    • 2013 Total Return: 13.13%
    • 2015 Total Return: -1.10%
    • 5-Year Annualized Return: 4.66%

    The S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Daily Risk Control 5% Index is designed to measure the performance of large cap, blue chip companies within the S&P 500 that have followed a managed-dividends policy of consistently increasing dividends every year for at least 25 years. Constituents must have a float-adjusted market cap of at least $3 billion and an average daily value traded of at least $5 million for the three months prior to the rebalancing reference date. At each daily rebalancing, the minimum number of constituents should be 40. The index also features a risk control element. On a daily basis, S&P allocates a portion of the invested funds into an interest accruing cash component to maintain a target volatility of 5 percent. This index is a one-year point-to-point and a yearly fact sheet is available for this index.

    AIG

    Index Name: ML Strategic Balanced Index (Ticker: MLSB:IND)

    Indices Used: S&P 500 & Merrill Lynch 10-Year Treasury Futures Total Return Index

    • 2013 Total Return: 2.86%
    • 2015 Total Return: -1.41%
    • 5-Year Annualized Return: 5.56%

    The Merrill Lynch Strategic Balanced Index blends equity and fixed income indices to seek an attractive level of return for a given level of risk. A non-discretionary, rules-based process is used to adjust exposures to the S&P 500® Index and the Merrill Lynch 10-Year Treasury Futures Total Return Index. This process may help the index generate positive returns while meeting a target volatility level. Index weightings are reviewed and rebalanced every six months based on the historical volatility of the index. As an additional measure of risk control, cash positions may be increased or reduced daily to help maintain the overall volatility of the Index at 6 percent. This index has an one and two-year point-to-point option.

    Allianz

    Index Name: Barclays US Dynamic Balance II Index (Ticker: BXIIUDB2)

    Indices Used: S&P 500 & Barclays US Aggregate RBI Series 1 Index

    • 2013 Total Return: 7.74%
    • 2015 Total Return: -2.88%
    • 5-Year Annualized Return: 4.13%

    The Barclays US Dynamic Balance II Index reflects the performance of an index strategy that uses the S&P 500 Index and the Barclays US Aggregate RBI Series 1 Index. The Barclays US Aggregate RBI Series 1 Index is comprised of a portfolio of derivative instruments plus cash that are designed to track the Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index. Every day, the Barclays US Dynamic Balance Index II dynamically allocates between the S&P 500 and Barclays US Aggregate RBI Series 1 Index based on their historical realized volatility. Weighting in the aforementioned indexes shifts daily, up to 3 percent, based on the greater of the 20 or four-day realized volatility of each index. The realized volatilities are used to determine the final weight allocation daily. This index is a one-year point-to-point.

    Forethought

    Index Name: Barclays ARMOUR II Gross USD 7% ER Index (Ticker: BXIIAG7E)

    Indices Used: S&P 500 Total Return Index, iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Fund, S&P GSCI Total Return Index, SPDR Gold Trust, Barclays US 10yr Treasury Futures Index and USD Libor 1-month

    • 2013 Total Return: 3.01%
    • 2015 Total Return: -20.92%
    • 5-Year Annualized Return: -1.71%

    The ARMOUR II Gross USD 7% ER Index incorporates a multi-asset allocation strategy that attempts to adaptively allocate assets in accordance with a quantitative model to deliver returns. The strategy is applied to a set of assets from 6 different asset classes: Developed equity, emerging market equity, commodities, gold, bonds and cash. On a daily basis, the strategy allocates a portion to cash to maintain a 7 percent target volatility. The remaining allocation is split between the two best-performing asset classes based on the previous month’s actual performance of each class. The strategy allocates 60 percent to the best performing asset class and 40 percent to the second-best performing asset class. The strategy adapts its allocations on a monthly basis as it strives to capture changing trends. This index is a three-year point-to-point and a monthly fact sheet is available for this index.

    Who created the volatility-controlled index?

    We the clients, advisors and wholesalers, in essence, indirectly created these indices when we demanded for protection of our assets, and greater upside potential than a traditional cap or fixed rate could provide. As stated at the beginning, “as index annuities gain popularity competition for market share is fierce, and volatility-controlled indices have become an industry standard. This article aimed to show you that all volatility-controlled indices are, in fact, not created equal to highlight the difference of each index and not to prove if one index is better or worse than another.” In an industry of uncertainty, selling certainty, at least one thing remains certain: Insurance carriers are more than willing to compete for your business. Ask and you shall receive. However, ask wisely and be prepared to learn as your industry advances or you will be left behind. That is true with any career and in any sales-driven field.

    Originally Posted at ProducersWeb on February 9, 2016 by Daniel W. McDonald.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency