We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (16,884)
  • Industry Conferences (3)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Negative Media (139)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (625)
  • Sheryl's Blogs (178)
  • Wink's Articles (242)
  • Wink's Blogs (225)
  • Wink's Press Releases (93)
  • Blog Archives

  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Industry Reps Say Companies Not Inflating Harm of DOL Rule

    February 16, 2016 by Frank Klimko, Washington correspondent, BestWeek: frank.klimko@ambest.com

    WASHINGTON – Insurers and industry representatives rebuffed lawmaker accusations that financial services firms are overstating how a proposed fiduciary conflict-of-interest rule would destabilize the market and make it harder to provide adequate retirement advice to consumers.

    In a letter to U.S. Labor Secretary Thomas Perez, U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and U.S. Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., accused companies of claiming calamity from the proposed rule and then painting a more hopeful picture during investment calls.

    The American Council of Life Insurers said companies have been transparent in their message about the proposed rule, which the ACLI said would impose unworkable standards on investment advisers.

    “ACLI and its member companies have been clear and consistent,” the ACLI said in a statement. “While life insurers may have no choice but to conform to the Labor Department’s final fiduciary regulation, the proposal as drafted would hurt lower- and middle-income consumers preparing for retirement.”

    If implemented as proposed, the group worried they would see substantial decreases in such areas as savings due to lack of access to investment, the number of small business employee-retirement plans and annuity options available in the workplace.

    “ACLI agrees that financial professionals should work in consumers’ best interest,” the ACLI said, “but Americans’ best interest will not be served by a regulatory scheme that hinders access to the advice and products that they want and need.”

    In their letter, the lawmakers singled out 2015 earnings calls made by Lincoln Financial Group and Prudential Financial Inc.

    “In contrast to their public doomsday predictions, industry leaders have told their own investors that they ‘don’t see this as a significant hurdle,’” the letter said, “and that they are well-positioned to ‘adapt to any regulatory framework that emerges.’”

    During investors calls, firms must abide by strict legal requirements about the challenges they face, the lawmakers said.

    “Publicly traded companies are rarely held accountable for the assertions they make when lobbying in Washington, even if those assertions are untrue,” they wrote. “But when communicating with investors, publicly traded companies are required by law to provide full and accurate information.”

    There was no conflict between the public and private comments, said Scot Hoffman, Prudential vice president, head of communications, corporate.

    “As we have said consistently, the Department of Labor fiduciary rule could have the unintended consequence of limiting client access to financial advice and retirement solutions,” Hoffman told Best’s News Service. “We have a business mix and business strategies that enable us to navigate that potential disruption better than most of our competitors, but that does not lessen our concerns about unintended consequences for American households.”

    Michael Arcaro, Lincoln vice president and head of corporate communications, was equally adamant the company was not trying to mislead anyone.

    “We also stand by our comment letters to the DOL, in which we voiced support for the best interest standard and requested two minor improvements,” Arcaro told Best’s News Service. “These changes will prevent the potentially negative impact that the rule may have on middle-class Americans’ ability to obtain much-needed guaranteed lifetime income that is provided by variable annuities.”

    Arcaro noted during the fourth-quarter investor call, officials said the company has only about 30% in variable annuities products that would be impacted by the DOL proposal.

    “If necessary, Lincoln can pivot to other products that are not affected by the DOL rule, further reducing our dependence on the impacted sales,” Arcaro said. “The products that Lincoln would pivot toward, however, may not provide the same flexibility and opportunity for growing income as variable annuities, impacted by the rule.”

    A House committee earlier this month approved a pair of industry-backed bills to modify the pending rule. It just moved to the Office of Management and Budget for a last-stage regulatory review before it becomes final (Best’s News Service, Feb. 2, 2016).

    Originally Posted at AM Best on February 12, 2016 by Frank Klimko, Washington correspondent, BestWeek: frank.klimko@ambest.com.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency