We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,225)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (420)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (803)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Fitch: DOL Proposal Could Affect US Individual Annuity Sales

    April 5, 2016 by Fitch Credit Ratings

    NEW YORK & CHICAGO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–A US Department of Labor (DOL) proposal promoting new best interest standards that provide protections primarily to individual and small business investors related to retirement accounts and annuities could affect US individual annuity sales, according to Fitch Ratings.

    The proposal, expected to be finalized imminently, is viewed as credit neutral to US life insurers. Fitch does not expect the potential reduction in revenue to negatively affect the industry’s overall credit profile. Longer term, the potential adoption of such a fiduciary standard applied to a broader set of products sold by US life insurers would be a credit negative. Fitch expects the bulk of the final DOL regulations will remain largely as proposed, with some more minor changes in procedure likely.

    Fitch expects the new regulations could have a material negative impact on the sale of certain annuity products, drive changes in product offerings, distribution strategies and compensation structures and lead to increased operational costs to comply with the new standard. The DOL regulations ultimately aim to reduce potential conflicts of interest between selling agents and the retail investor and to broaden the scope of individuals covered under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).

    Under the new DOL proposal, a best interest fiduciary standard would apply to retirement plans with less than 100 participants or $100 million in plan assets, an individual plan participant or an IRA owner. As a fiduciary, an advisor is prevented from receiving commissions on product sales unless the advisor commits to following a best interest fiduciary standard and to adhering to certain compliance policies, procedures and disclosures of fees and potential conflicts (known as the Best Interest Contract, or BIC). As the new proposal carves out retirement plans with more than 100 participants or plans with at least $100 million in assets (which have fiduciaries with financial expertise), the employer-sponsored group business for midsized or large companies will not be affected under the new proposal.

    A notable exemption for life insurers currently under ERISA is the Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-24, which allows fiduciary insurance advisors to receive commissions for selling insurance products to plans, participants and IRAs. In its current form, insurance products include all annuity contracts, regardless of whether the product is considered a security under federal securities law.

    The new DOL proposal would effectively limit insurance product sales to IRAs to fixed annuity contracts as variable annuity contracts are considered a security under federal securities law and would no longer be exempt under PTE 84-24. Therefore, variable annuities would be subject to the more onerous requirements of the BIC described above. This proposed change would have significant implications for annuity writers as it could negatively affect sales of variable annuities into qualified plans and could positively affect sales of fixed annuities and fixed indexed annuities (FIA). The FIA market in particular has grown significantly in recent years due to the relative attractiveness of the product in a low interest rate environment.

    The new proposal also includes changes to the compensation paid by insurance companies to advisors for the sale of insurance products. Insurance companies would need to alter their payment structures to comply, which could include the development of new products that would continue to remain exempt under the new regulations. The DOL proposal would increase the risk of litigation to insurance agents and insurance companies which may, in turn, increase compliance costs related to the monitoring and enforcement of the new regulation. Finally, increased reporting and procedural obligations will result in increased distribution costs through certain insurance agent and broker channels.

    Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com.

    The above article originally appeared as a post on the Fitch Wire credit market commentary page. The original article, which may include hyperlinks to companies and current ratings, can be accessed at www.fitchratings.com. All opinions expressed are those of Fitch Ratings.

    ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEBSITE ‘WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM’. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE ‘CODE OF CONDUCT’ SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

    Contacts

    Fitch Ratings
    Nelson Ma, CFA
    Director
    Insurance
    +1 212 908-0273
    Fitch Ratings
    33 Whitehall Street
    New York, NY
    or
    Douglas Meyer, CFA
    Managing Director
    Insurance
    +1 312 368-2061
    70 W. Madison Street
    Chicago, IL
    or
    Kellie Geressy-Nilsen
    Senior Director
    Fitch Wire
    +1 212 908-9123
    or
    Media Relations:
    Hannah James, New York, + 1 646-582-4947
    Email: hannah.james@fitchratings.com

    Originally Posted at Business Wire on March 31, 2016 by Fitch Credit Ratings.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency