We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Could annuities be more valuable when rates are low? : Opinion

    May 18, 2016 by Alicia H. Munnell

    Are annuities more valuable when interest rates are low? That seems counterintuitive. After all, annuities produce higher monthly incomes when interest rates are high. But consider the extreme case of a zero interest rate. That scenario eliminates the option of living off the income from investments in retirement. The choices come down to various alternative ways of drawing down principal. And assume in such an environment that people give up on the notion of leaving a bequest.

    As shown in the Figure, a sixty-five-year-old male could expect to receive $5,048 each year for the rest of his life from annuitizing $100,000, assuming a zero-percent return. This calculation also assumes that the actuarially-fair annuity amount is reduced by 15 percent to cover marketing costs, etc.

    Figure. Annual Income Produced from $100,000 by Annuitization versus Alternative Asset Management Strategies

    Source: Author’s calculations.

    Source: Author’s calculations.

     
    But people often think that they can do better managing their own investments and withdrawing money from those investments over time. However, that does not turn out to be true. Consider three alternative options.

    Option 1 is self-annuitization. That is, the retiree withdraws $5,048 each year, just as if he annuitized. This option works well for a period of time. But the assets are depleted after 18 years (as illustrated in the Figure by the abrupt drop at age 83), and the retiree still has a 54-percent chance of being alive.

    Option 2 would be a long-life strategy. That is, the retiree selects some distant age such as 100 and spends down assets evenly over this period. The problem here is that the retiree would be able to spend only $2,857 each year over the 35-year period and would have no resources to support himself should he live beyond 100.

    Option 3 is a strategy based on life expectancy. Under this option, the retiree spends a fraction of assets each year based on expected remaining years of life. For example, average male life expectancy at age 65 is 19 years, so the person would spend one-nineteenth of the $100,000, or $5,263. Income under this option is initially higher than that provided by an annuity, but the withdrawals fall with age, creating a significant chance of impoverishment in old age.

    Looking at the alternative options shows that the gains from annuitization are substantial, even assuming that interest rates are at zero and that the provider takes a 15-percent cut off the fair annuity value. The gains arise because insurance companies pool experience and use assets from deceased annuitants to pay those who survive – producing a “mortality premium.”

    This simple exercise raises two questions in my mind. I, like most other human beings, really don’t like the idea of traditional annuities for the array of rational and irrational reasons cited in numerous studies. But I’m wondering if I should reconsider. Second, I’m wondering if researchers have done a study showing how the value of annuities varies by the level of market rates for people at various points in the income distribution. I’m going to check.

    Originally Posted at MarketWatch on May 18, 2016 by Alicia H. Munnell.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency